Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#61
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Mait001
writes Despite everything that has been said, I still strongly dispute that there are 4 trains per hour from Waterloo to Wandsworth Town in the evening peak period. I wrote: There aren't four - there are six per hour! My normal travel time is a bit later: I'd like to know how many trains are timetabled between 7 and 8p.m. That's fine, but the evening peak period is generally considered to end at 7pm, so you are now making a different point to the one you made before, which was about peak-time travel. After the peak, instead of 6 trains an hour, you are back to the normal off-peak frequency of four trains an hour for ON stations, in this case at 15-minute intervals: 19:02, 19:17, 19:32 and 19:47 The timetable is on the web at: http://www.swtrains.co.uk/traintimes...3/ITT15s03.pdf While I can believe that delays or cancellations could be more likely after the rush hour has finished, I have been keeping an eye on the SWT website for Wandsworth Town services, and the only disruption I have seen is the odd 2-minute delay on the occasional service. Most trains seem to be running on time at their appointed 15-minute intervals. -- Paul Terry |
#62
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Paul Terry wrote:
In message , Arthur Figgis ] writes On 10 Feb 2004 14:06:33 GMT, (Mait001) wrote: a European anthem (by Beethoeven, a..... German) Maybe we should have a nice English tune, like the one for "Oben am jungen Rhein". I'm not very clear who Mait001 thinks should write a European anthem For the last time - THIS IS WHAT THE EUROVISION SONG CONTEST IS FOR! tom -- A plug on its back, straining to suck voltage from the sky |
#63
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , ] (Arthur Figgis) wrote:
Since it's German (more correctly S-Bahn), surely it's only used in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Unless there is a well-hidden Vaduz S-Bahn :-) Yes - or even Eupen (Belgium). :-) -- Peter Beale |
#64
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
QJump shows the following:
Waterloo dep 1902 1916 1917 1932 1945 1947 Wandsworth Town arr 1914 2013 1929 1944 2043 1959 HTH, Barry Thanks, Barry! Marc. |
#65
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I'm not very clear who Mait001 thinks should write a European anthem We should not have a European anthem. Nations have anthems, groupings of countries (the U.N., Commonwealth etc.) do not. Marc. |
#66
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
My normal travel time is a bit later: I'd like to know how many trains are
timetabled between 7 and 8p.m. That's fine, but the evening peak period is generally considered to end at 7pm, Have you been to Waterloo between 7p.m and 8p.m?! It certainly looks like peak crowding to me! Marc. |
#67
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mait001 wrote:
I'm not very clear who Mait001 thinks should write a European anthem We should not have a European anthem. Nations have anthems, groupings of countries (the U.N., Commonwealth etc.) do not. Why not? I think it's disgusting. |
#68
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Rowland wrote:
"Matt Ashby" wrote... This is very useful to me because when I'm at a station and I can see the ON logo I know that I won't be standing at the station for 30 minutes waiting for a train. You haven't read the small print! I don't know whether this is still the case, but about 5 years ago, certain South London stations [1] had 4 trains an hour to London, with alternating 25 minute and 5 minute gaps (or worse). Sadly, these qualify for the ON logo. The ON concept should revolve around maximum separation of trains, rather than trains per hour, if it is to inspire any confidence. AIUI they don't and it does. [1] I think it was the Mottingham line, but there are probably several different lines with this problem. No, that line had alternating 21 and 9 minute gaps. It's since been evened up. I think the line with really big gaps was Orpington via Sydenham Hill and Beckenham Junction. ISTR Sutton had 4 trains to London per hour, but the slow ones got overtaken by the fast ones, making an effective 2 tph frequency to London, but this would also qualify to be an ON station. Aside from the issue of whether 4 irregular tph qualifies, I think it depends on line service frequency - extra fast trains wouldn't count. |
#69
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Rowland wrote:
"Peter Beale" wrote... (Clive Page) wrote: Wouldn't it be better to call it the S-bahn? It's a term understood over large parts of continental Europe; a short term, easy to read on signs. Since it's German (more correctly S-Bahn), surely it's only used in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Paris has its RER, perhaps other continental cities have the equivalent with appropriate local names. Copenhagen has the S-tog. Incidentally, the S in S-Bahn does not stand for surface, suburban or any equivalent German term. It stands for "Stadt" (city) and relates to the way an S-Bahn is funded and owned. ISTR the funding arrangements and/or ownership of an S-Bahn and a U-Bahn are different, and whether a line is considered to be part of the U-Bahn or the S-Bahn is dependent on its funding arrangement and/or ownership, and not on whether it is above or below ground. Therefore calling part of our NR network an "S-Bahn" would probably mislead Germans rather than enlighten them. I'd like clarification on the above points from someone... As Germany has (over the last few years) gained several Stadtbahnen (light rail lines) which are quite different from S-bahnen, I don't believe you! |
#70
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Aidan Stanger" wrote in message
... John Rowland wrote: Incidentally, the S in S-Bahn does not stand for surface, suburban or any equivalent German term. It stands for "Stadt" (city) and relates to the way an S-Bahn is funded and owned. ISTR the funding arrangements and/or ownership of an S-Bahn and a U-Bahn are different, and whether a line is considered to be part of the U-Bahn or the S-Bahn is dependent on its funding arrangement and/or ownership, and not on whether it is above or below ground. I'd like clarification on the above points from someone... As Germany has (over the last few years) gained several Stadtbahnen (light rail lines) which are quite different from S-bahnen, I don't believe you! Crossposted to MTRE for extra input. Please would someone support or refute my comments above! -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Road Hog Road Tax Cartoon. | London Transport | |||
New M6 Toll road opens,road for fools ? | London Transport | |||
Lambeth/Borough Road/Southwark Bridge Road | London Transport |