Woolwich Ferry question
 

Theo Markettos wrote:
Theo Markettos wrote:
Looks like the pier has been there since 1847.

Some pictures:
http://www.disused-stations.org.uk/n...index122.shtml

Yes, I'd also stumbled on that site after posing my question. I went along
there this morning and took some new pics, which I'll. upload tomorrow. I
was the solitary foot passenger on the ferry I took to the south bank.

The old station/museum looks a bit sad these days, with boarded-up windows.
I wonder how long before it's replaced by another block of riverside posh
flats?

Woolwich Ferry question
 

Recliner wrote:
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 13:26:14 on Fri, 27 Mar
2015, Basil Jet remarked:
Why do both of the piers bend to face the sea? It almost looks
as if they wanted to maximise pier length while simultaneously
maximising ferry crossing distance.

Presumably to be parallel to the flow of the river?

Fair enough, although it doesn't explain why they are opposite
each other
and facing the same way, when placing the north pier by the
abandoned
railway station and bending up-river would give shorter routes to
the south pier.

Presumably they wanted the ferries to dock facing upstream?

It's tidal.

From Teddington to the North Sea.

And obviously at Woolwich.

And the flow on the tideway is a good deal quicker on the
flood than on the ebb.

--
Robin
reply to address is (meant to be) valid

Woolwich Ferry question
 

On 27 Mar 2015 16:04:32 +0000 (GMT), Theo Markettos
wrote:

Theo Markettos wrote:
Looks like the pier has been there since 1847.

Some pictures:
http://www.disused-stations.org.uk/n...index122.shtml


And here's some more of mine, taken yesterday morning:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/reclin...7651196745800/