London Banter

London Banter (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/forum.php)
-   London Transport (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/)
-   -   ELL closed (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/14304-ell-closed.html)

Recliner[_3_] April 30th 15 10:52 AM

ELL closed
 
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 10:35:28 +0000 (UTC),
d wrote:

On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 11:26:11 +0100
Recliner wrote:
Indeed so. And if trains were out-stabled, what's the chances they'd
get covered in graffiti?


They could leave a couple at Dalston junction. That looks reasonable secure.


They couldn't run much of a service with only two trains, plus the
trains may get cleaned/inspected/maintained in the depot overnight.
There's also the issue of getting drivers there and back. It seems
like a lot of complications for little benefit.

Tim Roll-Pickering[_2_] April 30th 15 10:52 AM

ELL closed
 
Someone Somewhere wrote:

And if people see that length of line as crucial they clearly have very
short memories.


Yes but London Bridge hasn't historically been so restricted and the
ELL/Jubilee Line has been used as a key bypass.

--
My blog: http://adf.ly/4hi4c



[email protected] April 30th 15 01:18 PM

ELL closed
 
In article ,
(Recliner) wrote:

On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 10:35:28 +0000 (UTC),
d wrote:

On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 11:26:11 +0100
Recliner wrote:
Indeed so. And if trains were out-stabled, what's the chances they'd
get covered in graffiti?


They could leave a couple at Dalston junction. That looks reasonable
secure.


They couldn't run much of a service with only two trains, plus the
trains may get cleaned/inspected/maintained in the depot overnight.
There's also the issue of getting drivers there and back. It seems
like a lot of complications for little benefit.


It's pretty standard to stable some trains in underground platforms, so why
not on the ELL? Highbury and Islington would be good for another 2.

--
Colin Rosenstiel

Basil Jet[_4_] May 1st 15 01:56 AM

ELL closed
 
On 2015\04\30 14:18, wrote:

It's pretty standard to stable some trains in underground platforms, so why
not on the ELL? Highbury and Islington would be good for another 2.


Because it's harder to secure the overground against graffitists.

[email protected] May 1st 15 11:24 AM

ELL closed
 
In article , (Basil Jet)
wrote:

On 2015\04\30 14:18,
wrote:

It's pretty standard to stable some trains in underground platforms, so
why not on the ELL? Highbury and Islington would be good for another 2.


Because it's harder to secure the overground against graffitists.


Then how do they manage at e.g. Parson's Green?

--
Colin Rosenstiel


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk