London Banter

London Banter (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/forum.php)
-   London Transport (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/)
-   -   UK faces first major train strike in 20 years (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/14319-uk-faces-first-major-train.html)

e27002 aurora May 15th 15 07:10 AM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
On Thu, 14 May 2015 15:44:20 +0100, Roland Perry
wrote:

In message , at 15:41:03 on
Thu, 14 May 2015, e27002 aurora remarked:
The slogan was once "a fair day's pay for a fair day's work".

I take it that's been abandoned since "a good wage" is by no means the same
thing.


On the "excellent, good, fair, poor" scale, surely we can improve on
fair! :-)

That is the expression that came to mind. I happen to believe it cuts
both ways. The employees at my local SWT station do an outstanding
job. They should


not?


Yes, as in the corrected version.

have to scrimp to survive.


That sounds like an argument to increase the minimum wage, because
plenty of hard-working(tm) people only get that much.


Government should interfere with private contracts only where
absolutely necessary.

I suspect that most jobs on the railway
(except perhaps tube station
ticket office staff)


Now we may observe an enormous public sector folly in real time. Only
a public body could be this stupid. Pity the poor tourist arriving in
London in need of guidance on using TfL services.

are fairly secure, which should also count for
quite a lot.


Employment longevity does not put food in one's children's' stomachs.


Roland Perry May 15th 15 07:46 AM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
In message , at 08:10:06 on
Fri, 15 May 2015, e27002 aurora remarked:

Employment longevity does not put food in one's children's' stomachs.


It does, compared with being on the dole.
--
Roland Perry

[email protected] May 15th 15 08:42 AM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
On Fri, 15 May 2015 08:10:06 +0100
e27002 aurora wrote:
I suspect that most jobs on the railway
(except perhaps tube station
ticket office staff)


Now we may observe an enormous public sector folly in real time. Only
a public body could be this stupid. Pity the poor tourist arriving in
London in need of guidance on using TfL services.


To be fair the blame can be squarely laid at the door of the blonde buffoon.
TfL simply have to do as their told. God help us if Boris ever becomes PM,
it'll be a ****ing disaster (and I speak as a Tory voter) not least because
the man is bone idle and is more interested in promoting himself than doing
what he's paid to do.

--
Spud



Mizter T May 15th 15 11:59 AM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 

On 15/05/2015 09:42, d wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 08:10:06 +0100
e27002 aurora wrote:
I suspect that most jobs on the railway
(except perhaps tube station
ticket office staff)


Now we may observe an enormous public sector folly in real time. Only
a public body could be this stupid. Pity the poor tourist arriving in
London in need of guidance on using TfL services.


To be fair the blame can be squarely laid at the door of the blonde buffoon.
TfL simply have to do as their told. God help us if Boris ever becomes PM,
it'll be a ****ing disaster (and I speak as a Tory voter) not least because
the man is bone idle and is more interested in promoting himself than doing
what he's paid to do.


The grant from central government to the GLA for transport has been
significantly cut back.

e27002 aurora May 15th 15 12:15 PM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:59:06 +0100, Mizter T
wrote:


On 15/05/2015 09:42, d wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 08:10:06 +0100
e27002 aurora wrote:
I suspect that most jobs on the railway
(except perhaps tube station
ticket office staff)

Now we may observe an enormous public sector folly in real time. Only
a public body could be this stupid. Pity the poor tourist arriving in
London in need of guidance on using TfL services.


To be fair the blame can be squarely laid at the door of the blonde buffoon.
TfL simply have to do as their told. God help us if Boris ever becomes PM,
it'll be a ****ing disaster (and I speak as a Tory voter) not least because
the man is bone idle and is more interested in promoting himself than doing
what he's paid to do.


The grant from central government to the GLA for transport has been
significantly cut back.


Which was not a goog thing. Although There is almost certainly fat to
be trimmed at TfL in the mamgement rank.

The previous government also reduced policemen's benefits, a very bad
move indeed. One hopes that one day we will have a real, grassroots,
working man's conservative movement in the UK.

The Real Doctor May 15th 15 12:57 PM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
On 15/05/15 13:15, e27002 aurora wrote:
The previous government also reduced policemen's benefits, a very bad
move indeed.


On the contrary, about bloody time.

Ian

[email protected] May 15th 15 02:24 PM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
On Fri, 15 May 2015 13:15:58 +0100
e27002 aurora wrote:
The previous government also reduced policemen's benefits, a very bad
move indeed. One hopes that one day we will have a real, grassroots,
working man's conservative movement in the UK.


If they could get rid of the cranks, nutters and dead wood that would be
UKIP. But I can't see it happening anytime soon.

--
Spud


[email protected] May 15th 15 02:30 PM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:59:06 +0100
Mizter T wrote:
On 15/05/2015 09:42, d wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 08:10:06 +0100
e27002 aurora wrote:
I suspect that most jobs on the railway
(except perhaps tube station
ticket office staff)

Now we may observe an enormous public sector folly in real time. Only
a public body could be this stupid. Pity the poor tourist arriving in
London in need of guidance on using TfL services.


To be fair the blame can be squarely laid at the door of the blonde buffoon.
TfL simply have to do as their told. God help us if Boris ever becomes PM,
it'll be a ****ing disaster (and I speak as a Tory voter) not least because
the man is bone idle and is more interested in promoting himself than doing
what he's paid to do.


The grant from central government to the GLA for transport has been
significantly cut back.


I don't see how moving staff out of ticket offices and investing in even
more expensive ticketing machines is going to reduce spending. Unless of
course the long term plan is to dispense with said staff in a few years
when they've been deemed to be "ineffective". Though hopefully whoever the
next mayor is can at least stop this in its tracks before too much damage
is done.

--
Spud



e27002 aurora May 15th 15 02:33 PM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
On Fri, 15 May 2015 14:24:45 +0000 (UTC),
d wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 13:15:58 +0100
e27002 aurora wrote:
The previous government also reduced policemen's benefits, a very bad
move indeed. One hopes that one day we will have a real, grassroots,
working man's conservative movement in the UK.


If they could get rid of the cranks, nutters and dead wood that would be
UKIP. But I can't see it happening anytime soon.


I did have hopes. But, they are a longtime maturing into an electable
party.

e27002 aurora May 15th 15 02:48 PM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
On Fri, 15 May 2015 14:30:36 +0000 (UTC),
d wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:59:06 +0100
Mizter T wrote:
On 15/05/2015 09:42,
d wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 08:10:06 +0100
e27002 aurora wrote:
I suspect that most jobs on the railway
(except perhaps tube station
ticket office staff)

Now we may observe an enormous public sector folly in real time. Only
a public body could be this stupid. Pity the poor tourist arriving in
London in need of guidance on using TfL services.

To be fair the blame can be squarely laid at the door of the blonde buffoon.
TfL simply have to do as their told. God help us if Boris ever becomes PM,
it'll be a ****ing disaster (and I speak as a Tory voter) not least because
the man is bone idle and is more interested in promoting himself than doing
what he's paid to do.


The grant from central government to the GLA for transport has been
significantly cut back.


I don't see how moving staff out of ticket offices and investing in even
more expensive ticketing machines is going to reduce spending. Unless of
course the long term plan is to dispense with said staff in a few years
when they've been deemed to be "ineffective". Though hopefully whoever the
next mayor is can at least stop this in its tracks before too much damage
is done.



The stranger needs a counter, or a window, where he can ask for help
and be sold the correct ticked regardless of what denominations his
money is in, or what sort of credit card he has.

I have been in exactly this situation in San Francisco. The gates are
automated, tickets are sold by machines that, back then, only took the
correct coins. The one human being on duty told me to leave the
station and come back with right change.

SF Muni is fascinating system. But, I find it hard to consider myself
a fan.

Recliner[_3_] May 15th 15 03:05 PM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2015 08:10:06 +0100
e27002 aurora wrote:
I suspect that most jobs on the railway
(except perhaps tube station
ticket office staff)


Now we may observe an enormous public sector folly in real time. Only
a public body could be this stupid. Pity the poor tourist arriving in
London in need of guidance on using TfL services.


To be fair the blame can be squarely laid at the door of the blonde buffoon.
TfL simply have to do as their told. God help us if Boris ever becomes PM,
it'll be a ****ing disaster (and I speak as a Tory voter) not least because
the man is bone idle and is more interested in promoting himself than doing
what he's paid to do.


It's odd that you think Boris is both bone idle and inclined to manage TfL
in such a detailed way.

Christopher A. Lee[_2_] May 15th 15 04:21 PM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
On Fri, 15 May 2015 15:48:26 +0100, e27002 aurora
wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 14:30:36 +0000 (UTC),
wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:59:06 +0100
Mizter T wrote:
On 15/05/2015 09:42, d wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 08:10:06 +0100
e27002 aurora wrote:
I suspect that most jobs on the railway
(except perhaps tube station
ticket office staff)

Now we may observe an enormous public sector folly in real time. Only
a public body could be this stupid. Pity the poor tourist arriving in
London in need of guidance on using TfL services.

To be fair the blame can be squarely laid at the door of the blonde buffoon.
TfL simply have to do as their told. God help us if Boris ever becomes PM,
it'll be a ****ing disaster (and I speak as a Tory voter) not least because
the man is bone idle and is more interested in promoting himself than doing
what he's paid to do.

The grant from central government to the GLA for transport has been
significantly cut back.


I don't see how moving staff out of ticket offices and investing in even
more expensive ticketing machines is going to reduce spending. Unless of
course the long term plan is to dispense with said staff in a few years
when they've been deemed to be "ineffective". Though hopefully whoever the
next mayor is can at least stop this in its tracks before too much damage
is done.



The stranger needs a counter, or a window, where he can ask for help
and be sold the correct ticked regardless of what denominations his
money is in, or what sort of credit card he has.

I have been in exactly this situation in San Francisco. The gates are
automated, tickets are sold by machines that, back then, only took the
correct coins. The one human being on duty told me to leave the
station and come back with right change.

SF Muni is fascinating system. But, I find it hard to consider myself
a fan.


BART is far from unique,

But I stopped using them out of disgust when I lived in Union City
(first stop out of Fremont, on the East Bay).

I had used the train to go to Bakersfield at the South end of the
Central Valley, several times.

The first BART train on Saturday from Fremont connected with the
Amtrak train at Richmond, for a pleasant and comfortable Amtrak ride
the rest of the way.

But one morning nobody bothered to open up the Union City station, so
the BART train came and went.

So I drove via I-580 and I-5. which was more tiring, less convenient
and less comfortable.

And I never used BART again when I lived there.

The Real Doctor May 15th 15 05:47 PM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
On 15/05/15 15:24, d wrote:
If they could get rid of the cranks, nutters and dead wood that would be
UKIP.


Taking the cranks, nutters and deadwood out of UKIP would be like taking
the water out of Loch Lomond.

Ian

[email protected] May 15th 15 06:39 PM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
In article , d
() wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:59:06 +0100
Mizter T wrote:
On 15/05/2015 09:42,
d wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 08:10:06 +0100
e27002 aurora wrote:
I suspect that most jobs on the railway (except perhaps tube station
ticket office staff)

Now we may observe an enormous public sector folly in real time. Only
a public body could be this stupid. Pity the poor tourist arriving in
London in need of guidance on using TfL services.

To be fair the blame can be squarely laid at the door of the blonde
buffoon. TfL simply have to do as their told. God help us if Boris ever
becomes PM, it'll be a ****ing disaster (and I speak as a Tory voter)
not least because the man is bone idle and is more interested in
promoting himself than doing what he's paid to do.


The grant from central government to the GLA for transport has been
significantly cut back.


I don't see how moving staff out of ticket offices and investing in even
more expensive ticketing machines is going to reduce spending. Unless of
course the long term plan is to dispense with said staff in a few years
when they've been deemed to be "ineffective". Though hopefully whoever the
next mayor is can at least stop this in its tracks before too much damage
is done.


Sadly the truth is that even more expensive ticketing machines are cheaper
than the salaries and pensions of staff.

--
Colin Rosenstiel

[email protected] May 15th 15 07:06 PM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
On Fri, 15 May 2015 15:05:16 +0000 (UTC)
Recliner wrote:
wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2015 08:10:06 +0100
e27002 aurora wrote:
I suspect that most jobs on the railway
(except perhaps tube station
ticket office staff)

Now we may observe an enormous public sector folly in real time. Only
a public body could be this stupid. Pity the poor tourist arriving in
London in need of guidance on using TfL services.


To be fair the blame can be squarely laid at the door of the blonde buffoon.
TfL simply have to do as their told. God help us if Boris ever becomes PM,
it'll be a ****ing disaster (and I speak as a Tory voter) not least because
the man is bone idle and is more interested in promoting himself than doing
what he's paid to do.


It's odd that you think Boris is both bone idle and inclined to manage TfL
in such a detailed way.


It doesn't take much effort to come up with stupid ideas and then tell
someone else to implement them.

--
Spud


[email protected] May 15th 15 07:13 PM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
On Fri, 15 May 2015 18:47:50 +0100
The Real Doctor wrote:
On 15/05/15 15:24, d wrote:
If they could get rid of the cranks, nutters and dead wood that would be
UKIP.


Taking the cranks, nutters and deadwood out of UKIP would be like taking
the water out of Loch Lomond.


There are some good well meaning people in the party who have genuine concerns
about control by Brussels. But unfortunately they're outnumbered by the idiots
and you can see what happens when idiots get voted into power - towit the
SNP. A dead cat would have got in up there if it was wearing an SNP rosette
and plenty did.

--
Spud



The Real Doctor May 15th 15 08:51 PM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
On 15/05/15 20:13, d wrote:
There are some good well meaning people in the party who have genuine concerns
about control by Brussels.


Yeah, right, and the Socialist Workers' Party is full of people with a
genuine concern for the poor.

But unfortunately they're outnumbered by the idiots
and you can see what happens when idiots get voted into power - towit the
SNP.


The SNP were almost voted into power in 2007 and formed a minority
government. That was sufficiently popular that they were properly voted
into power as a majority government in 2011. That was sufficiently
popular that they were voted in to represent Scotland in 56 out of 59
Scottish constituencies this month. It's therefore a little hard to see
what disasters you think happened.

Mind you, it's always amusing to here UKIP supporters such as yourself
use precisely opposing arguments to explain why (a) Scotland MUST stay
in the UK and (b) why the UK MUST leave Europe. It sounds like a pretty
good example of cognitive dissonance which is easily resolved by
recognizing that UKIP are a bunch of loony little Englanders who loathe
all foreigners and classify Scots as foreign.

Ian

The Real Doctor May 15th 15 08:51 PM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
On 15/05/15 20:06, d wrote:
It doesn't take much effort to come up with stupid ideas and then tell
someone else to implement them.


As Mr Farage so ably demonstrates.

Ian

Mizter T May 15th 15 10:03 PM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 

On 15/05/2015 17:21, Christopher A. Lee wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 15:48:26 +0100, e27002 aurora
wrote:
[...]
SF Muni is fascinating system. But, I find it hard to consider myself
a fan.


BART is far from unique,

But I stopped using them out of disgust when I lived in Union City
(first stop out of Fremont, on the East Bay).

I had used the train to go to Bakersfield at the South end of the
Central Valley, several times.

The first BART train on Saturday from Fremont connected with the
Amtrak train at Richmond, for a pleasant and comfortable Amtrak ride
the rest of the way.

But one morning nobody bothered to open up the Union City station, so
the BART train came and went.

So I drove via I-580 and I-5. which was more tiring, less convenient
and less comfortable.

And I never used BART again when I lived there.


Seems a bit petulant.

e27002 aurora May 16th 15 07:01 AM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
On Fri, 15 May 2015 23:03:41 +0100, Mizter T
wrote:


On 15/05/2015 17:21, Christopher A. Lee wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 15:48:26 +0100, e27002 aurora
wrote:
[...]
SF Muni is fascinating system. But, I find it hard to consider myself
a fan.


BART is far from unique,

But I stopped using them out of disgust when I lived in Union City
(first stop out of Fremont, on the East Bay).

I had used the train to go to Bakersfield at the South end of the
Central Valley, several times.

The first BART train on Saturday from Fremont connected with the
Amtrak train at Richmond, for a pleasant and comfortable Amtrak ride
the rest of the way.

But one morning nobody bothered to open up the Union City station, so
the BART train came and went.

So I drove via I-580 and I-5. which was more tiring, less convenient
and less comfortable.

And I never used BART again when I lived there.


Seems a bit petulant.


Indeed, but it can be very annoying to be severely inconvenienced by a
public body that is supposed to be at one's service.

In 1975 my spouse was eight months pregnant with our first child. In
those days we lived in Hammersmith and attended Church in Roehampton.
The bus service was hourly.

As we were walking to the bus stop on our return journey our bus, an
RM, passed us. I ran and had caught it. But, the conductress would
not wait for my spouse to struggle the last 30 feet. Suddenly I saw
London Transport in a new light. That bitch will never know how much
good will she cost her employer that day.

Worth noting that Bart and Muni are not the same thing. Bart is a
multi-county heavy rail mass transit system that covers a large part
of the San Francisco bay area.

Muni is a light rail system that operates within the County of San
Francisco only.


--


e27002 aurora May 16th 15 07:14 AM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
On Fri, 15 May 2015 13:39:11 -0500,
wrote:

In article ,
d
() wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:59:06 +0100
Mizter T wrote:
On 15/05/2015 09:42,
d wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 08:10:06 +0100
e27002 aurora wrote:
I suspect that most jobs on the railway (except perhaps tube station
ticket office staff)

Now we may observe an enormous public sector folly in real time. Only
a public body could be this stupid. Pity the poor tourist arriving in
London in need of guidance on using TfL services.

To be fair the blame can be squarely laid at the door of the blonde
buffoon. TfL simply have to do as their told. God help us if Boris ever
becomes PM, it'll be a ****ing disaster (and I speak as a Tory voter)
not least because the man is bone idle and is more interested in
promoting himself than doing what he's paid to do.

The grant from central government to the GLA for transport has been
significantly cut back.


I don't see how moving staff out of ticket offices and investing in even
more expensive ticketing machines is going to reduce spending. Unless of
course the long term plan is to dispense with said staff in a few years
when they've been deemed to be "ineffective". Though hopefully whoever the
next mayor is can at least stop this in its tracks before too much damage
is done.


Sadly the truth is that even more expensive ticketing machines are cheaper
than the salaries and pensions of staff.


TfL, or a public body of its nature, should by sufficiently well
financed, and efficiently run, that it can appoint the staff
neccessary to do the job.

There is an ongoing need for a human presence. Strangers need a
point, a window, or counter, to which they can go for help.

The Real Doctor May 16th 15 09:21 AM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
On 16/05/15 08:14, e27002 aurora wrote:
There is an ongoing need for a human presence. Strangers need a
point, a window, or counter, to which they can go for help.


Since many strangers in London are foreign, good multilingual machines
are almost certainly much more use than an English-only counter service.

Ian

[email protected] May 16th 15 04:16 PM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
On Fri, 15 May 2015 21:51:16 +0100
The Real Doctor wrote:
On 15/05/15 20:13, d wrote:
But unfortunately they're outnumbered by the idiots
and you can see what happens when idiots get voted into power - towit the
SNP.


The SNP were almost voted into power in 2007 and formed a minority
government. That was sufficiently popular that they were properly voted
into power as a majority government in 2011. That was sufficiently
popular that they were voted in to represent Scotland in 56 out of 59
Scottish constituencies this month. It's therefore a little hard to see
what disasters you think happened.


You think all those SNP MPs are professionals? The majority of them
are a bunch of clueless idiots who under normal circumstances wouldn't
have got within a mile of being elected.

Mind you, it's always amusing to here UKIP supporters such as yourself


Actually I vote Tory, but I sympathise with UKIPs main message and
it seems 15 million other people did too.

use precisely opposing arguments to explain why (a) Scotland MUST stay
in the UK and (b) why the UK MUST leave Europe. It sounds like a pretty
good example of cognitive dissonance which is easily resolved by


I don't give a flying **** about the scots. Seems to me so long as
they have their benefits, booze, heroin and can carry on with their
self pitying sense of entitlement and have a nice long whinge (300
years and counting) most of them will be as happy as McLarry. My
only reason for wanting scotland to stay in the UK is for military
reasons.

recognizing that UKIP are a bunch of loony little Englanders who loathe
all foreigners and classify Scots as foreign.


Keep taking the pills, one day you may even find a clue in the bottle.

--
Spud



The Real Doctor May 16th 15 04:20 PM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
On 16/05/15 17:16, d wrote:
You think all those SNP MPs are professionals? The majority of them
are a bunch of clueless idiots who under normal circumstances wouldn't
have got within a mile of being elected.


You still haven't said what disasters you think have resulted from eight
years of SNP government in Edinburgh or from a week of high SNP
representation in Westminster.

Ian

[email protected] May 16th 15 05:45 PM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
On Sat, 16 May 2015 17:20:04 +0100
The Real Doctor wrote:
On 16/05/15 17:16, d wrote:
You think all those SNP MPs are professionals? The majority of them
are a bunch of clueless idiots who under normal circumstances wouldn't
have got within a mile of being elected.


You still haven't said what disasters you think have resulted from eight


I never mentioned disasters, you did. Clearly as a feeble attempt at
a straw man argument. But since you ask, how about the disaster that
would have occured if Scotland had gone independent with the SNP
basing all its economic projections on the high oil prices at the time.

Around about now with an independent Scotland Sturgeon would be heading
off to Brussels with a begging bowl to join the queue behind greece
and spain.

--
Spud



Mizter T May 16th 15 06:24 PM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 

On 16/05/2015 17:16, d wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 21:51:16 +0100
The Real Doctor wrote:
[...]
Mind you, it's always amusing to here UKIP supporters such as yourself


Actually I vote Tory, but I sympathise with UKIPs main message and
it seems 15 million other people did too.


I've no idea why I'm reading this, but where do you get 15 million
people from?

Robin9 May 17th 15 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Real Doctor (Post 148226)
On 15/05/15 20:13, d wrote:
There are some good well meaning people in the party who have genuine concerns
about control by Brussels.


Yeah, right, and the Socialist Workers' Party is full of people with a
genuine concern for the poor.

But unfortunately they're outnumbered by the idiots
and you can see what happens when idiots get voted into power - towit the
SNP.


The SNP were almost voted into power in 2007 and formed a minority
government. That was sufficiently popular that they were properly voted
into power as a majority government in 2011. That was sufficiently
popular that they were voted in to represent Scotland in 56 out of 59
Scottish constituencies this month. It's therefore a little hard to see
what disasters you think happened.

Mind you, it's always amusing to here UKIP supporters such as yourself
use precisely opposing arguments to explain why (a) Scotland MUST stay
in the UK and (b) why the UK MUST leave Europe. It sounds like a pretty
good example of cognitive dissonance which is easily resolved by
recognizing that UKIP are a bunch of loony little Englanders who loathe
all foreigners and classify Scots as foreign.

Ian

It's never amusing to hear UKIP detractors such as yourself use ill
thought-out generalisations to denigrate people who hold an alternative
opinion.

I voted UKIP ten days ago so I qualify as a UKIP supporter.

a) I do not say Scotland MUST stay in the UK;
b) I do not say UK MUST leave the European Union although I recognise
that it may be eventually become advantageous to do so;
c) I am not a little Englander and I do not hate all foreigners;
d) I do not classify Scots as foreign.

I live in Leyton, one of the most cosmopolitan areas of London. I could
easily afford to move to an all-white part of the country but I choose to
stay in Leyton.

I suggest you refrain from glib and specious generalisations and instead try
to understand why around 4 million people voted UKIP in the recent election.

Alistair Gunn May 17th 15 11:06 AM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
In uk.railway d twisted the electrons to say:
I never mentioned disasters, you did. Clearly as a feeble attempt at
a straw man argument. But since you ask, how about the disaster that
would have occured if Scotland had gone independent with the SNP
basing all its economic projections on the high oil prices at the time.


This would be the alternative timeline where the SNP formed a majority
rather than minority government in the period 2007-2011 and was thus able
to pass it's referendum bill in that session of parliament, and in a
further change to our timeline people voted for it?

Because in our timeline, the proposal from the SNP was (in the event of
"Yes" winning) that independence would come about in May 2016. Meanwhile
Better Together was claiming that was agressively optimistic and that it
might take much longer than that to achieve independence in the event of
a yes vote. Or to put it another way, no disaster would've occured yet
as even the "agressively optimistic" independence date wouldn't have
occured let alone the much later "sober, realistic" date ...
--
These opinions might not even be mine ...
Let alone connected with my employer ...

[email protected] May 17th 15 11:29 AM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
On Sat, 16 May 2015 19:24:49 +0100
Mizter T wrote:
On 16/05/2015 17:16, d wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 21:51:16 +0100
The Real Doctor wrote:
[...]
Mind you, it's always amusing to here UKIP supporters such as yourself


Actually I vote Tory, but I sympathise with UKIPs main message and
it seems 15 million other people did too.


I've no idea why I'm reading this, but where do you get 15 million
people from?


11 million Tory voters + 4 million UKIP.

And while you might say that perhaps some of those Tory voters don't give
a monkeys about a EU referendum I would suggest most do and the difference
will be made up by the large amount of Labour voters who also do.

--
Spud


[email protected] May 17th 15 11:35 AM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
On Sun, 17 May 2015 11:06:24 +0000 (UTC)
Alistair Gunn wrote:
a yes vote. Or to put it another way, no disaster would've occured yet
as even the "agressively optimistic" independence date wouldn't have
occured let alone the much later "sober, realistic" date ...


So you think the oil price will have gone up sufficiently by 2016 for the
SNP to wheel out its knackered economic policy once more and for people to be
dumb enough to fall for it?

Lets face it , Scotland has to suck from the teet of somewhere, be it
Westminster or Brussels because it doesn't have much of an economy to speak
of. Its half that of yourshire FFS. The SNP knows this which is why its so
pro EU because once its waved bye bye to westminster and the hand outs stop
it'll need Brussels to provide the money. Of course the privosos that will
come with it will be far worse than Westminster would ever ask for but by
then Salmond and Sturgeon will be doing the after dinner circuit basking in
their self righteousnous and won't give a ****.

--
Spud



Alistair Gunn May 17th 15 02:52 PM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
In uk.railway d twisted the electrons to say:
On Sun, 17 May 2015 11:06:24 +0000 (UTC)
Alistair Gunn wrote:
a yes vote. Or to put it another way, no disaster would've occured yet
as even the "agressively optimistic" independence date wouldn't have
occured let alone the much later "sober, realistic" date ...

So you think the oil price will have gone up sufficiently by 2016 for the
SNP to wheel out its knackered economic policy once more and for people to
be dumb enough to fall for it?


Nope, I've no real opinion on the future price of oil (other than it
having a general upward direction). I was commenting on the absurdity of
your apparent belief that Scotland would've been inpendenct already if
the vote had gone the other way back in September.

However you really should try getting your economic "facts" from
somewhere other than the Daily Wail! As it happens it isn't the case
that everyone in Scotland either works in the oil industry, the public
sector or lives on benefits ...
--
These opinions might not even be mine ...
Let alone connected with my employer ...

The Real Doctor May 17th 15 02:58 PM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
On 16/05/15 18:45, d wrote:
I never mentioned disasters, you did. Clearly as a feeble attempt at
a straw man argument.


What you wrote was "But unfortunately they're outnumbered by the idiots
and you can see what happens when idiots get voted into power - towit
the SNP." I am sill not sure what you think has happened since the SNP
was voted into power.

Around about now with an independent Scotland Sturgeon would be heading
off to Brussels with a begging bowl to join the queue behind greece
and spain.


UK budget deficit last year: £105,000,000,000.

Ian


Eric[_3_] May 17th 15 03:17 PM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
On 2015-05-17, Robin9 wrote:
On 2015-05-15, The Real Doctor wrote:
On 15/05/15 20:13, d wrote:
There are some good well meaning people in the party who have genuine
concerns about control by Brussels.


Yeah, right, and the Socialist Workers' Party is full of people with a
genuine concern for the poor.

But unfortunately they're outnumbered by the idiots
and you can see what happens when idiots get voted into power - towit the
SNP.


The SNP were almost voted into power in 2007 and formed a minority
government. That was sufficiently popular that they were properly voted
into power as a majority government in 2011. That was sufficiently
popular that they were voted in to represent Scotland in 56 out of 59
Scottish constituencies this month. It's therefore a little hard to see
what disasters you think happened.

Mind you, it's always amusing to here UKIP supporters such as yourself
use precisely opposing arguments to explain why (a) Scotland MUST stay
in the UK and (b) why the UK MUST leave Europe. It sounds like a pretty
good example of cognitive dissonance which is easily resolved by
recognizing that UKIP are a bunch of loony little Englanders who loathe
all foreigners and classify Scots as foreign.


It's never amusing to hear UKIP detractors such as yourself use ill
thought-out generalisations to denigrate people who hold an alternative
opinion.

I voted UKIP ten days ago so I qualify as a UKIP supporter.

a) I do not say Scotland MUST stay in the UK;
b) I do not say UK MUST leave the European Union although I recognise
that it may be eventually become advantageous to do so;


It will never be advantageous for me personally for the UK to leave the
EU. I am sure I am a very, very long way from being the only one.

c) I am not a little Englander and I do not hate all foreigners;
d) I do not classify Scots as foreign.

I live in Leyton, one of the most cosmopolitan areas of London. I could
easily afford to move to an all-white part of the country but I choose
to
stay in Leyton.

I suggest you refrain from glib and specious generalisations and instead
try to understand why around 4 million people voted UKIP in the recent
election.


But your list above doesn't really help in understanding that. So why
did you vote UKIP?

Eric
--
ms fnd in a lbry

The Real Doctor May 17th 15 03:54 PM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
On 17/05/15 12:35, d wrote:
Lets face it , Scotland has to suck from the teet of somewhere, be it
Westminster or Brussels because it doesn't have much of an economy to speak
of. Its half that of yourshire FFS.


The per capita GVA of Scotland is greater than any part of England
(including Yorkshire) except for London and the South-East.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Countri...GVA_per_capita

Ian

tim..... May 17th 15 05:46 PM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 

wrote in message
...
On Sat, 16 May 2015 19:24:49 +0100
Mizter T wrote:
On 16/05/2015 17:16, d wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 21:51:16 +0100
The Real Doctor wrote:
[...]
Mind you, it's always amusing to here UKIP supporters such as yourself

Actually I vote Tory, but I sympathise with UKIPs main message and
it seems 15 million other people did too.


I've no idea why I'm reading this, but where do you get 15 million
people from?


11 million Tory voters + 4 million UKIP.

And while you might say that perhaps some of those Tory voters don't give
a monkeys about a EU referendum I would suggest most do and the difference
will be made up by the large amount of Labour voters who also do.


I think that's a nonsense claim to make

you haven't a shred of evidence that it is true

most people voted Tory because they wanted them to continue running the
government, the fact that they offered a referendum is purely incidental to
their choice.

And I would go so far as to suggest that a large percentage of the people
who voted UKIP aren't bothered either

It is clear from the transfer of votes from LD to UKIP that UKIP have became
the recipient of the protest votes that the LDs have traditionally collected






Martin Edwards[_2_] May 18th 15 06:43 AM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
On 17/05/2015 12:35, d wrote:
On Sun, 17 May 2015 11:06:24 +0000 (UTC)
Alistair Gunn wrote:
a yes vote. Or to put it another way, no disaster would've occured yet
as even the "agressively optimistic" independence date wouldn't have
occured let alone the much later "sober, realistic" date ...


So you think the oil price will have gone up sufficiently by 2016 for the
SNP to wheel out its knackered economic policy once more and for people to be
dumb enough to fall for it?

Lets face it , Scotland has to suck from the teet of somewhere, be it
Westminster or Brussels because it doesn't have much of an economy to speak
of. Its half that of yourshire FFS. The SNP knows this which is why its so
pro EU because once its waved bye bye to westminster and the hand outs stop
it'll need Brussels to provide the money. Of course the privosos that will
come with it will be far worse than Westminster would ever ask for but by
then Salmond and Sturgeon will be doing the after dinner circuit basking in
their self righteousnous and won't give a ****.

--
Spud


As Orwell wrote in a different context, Scotland is no more capable of
being independent than a cat or a dog. I am not hostile to the people,
but they are being led.

--
Myth, after all, is what we believe naturally. History is what we must
painfully learn and struggle to remember. -Albert Goldman

[email protected] May 18th 15 08:32 AM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
On Sun, 17 May 2015 15:58:45 +0100
The Real Doctor wrote:
On 16/05/15 18:45, d wrote:
I never mentioned disasters, you did. Clearly as a feeble attempt at
a straw man argument.


What you wrote was "But unfortunately they're outnumbered by the idiots
and you can see what happens when idiots get voted into power - towit
the SNP." I am sill not sure what you think has happened since the SNP
was voted into power.


Can't you use google? Lets start with the NHS:

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/sc...endum-snp-cut-
nhs-420702

Around about now with an independent Scotland Sturgeon would be heading
off to Brussels with a begging bowl to join the queue behind greece
and spain.


UK budget deficit last year: £105,000,000,000.


We're far from being the worst in europe:

http://www.debtclocks.eu/public-debt...n-of-the-eu-me
mber-states.html

--
Spud



[email protected] May 18th 15 08:36 AM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
On Sun, 17 May 2015 18:46:25 +0100
"tim....." wrote:
wrote in message
And while you might say that perhaps some of those Tory voters don't give
a monkeys about a EU referendum I would suggest most do and the difference
will be made up by the large amount of Labour voters who also do.


I think that's a nonsense claim to make


Really? Well we'll have to disagree on that then.

you haven't a shred of evidence that it is true


No URL I can point you at no, but I do know people who vote Labour and
Brussels advancing its power bothers them too.

most people voted Tory because they wanted them to continue running the
government, the fact that they offered a referendum is purely incidental to
their choice.


So where's your evidence for that statement?

And I would go so far as to suggest that a large percentage of the people
who voted UKIP aren't bothered either


Now you're just talking out your arse.

It is clear from the transfer of votes from LD to UKIP that UKIP have became
the recipient of the protest votes that the LDs have traditionally collected


Lib Dems lost votes to UKIP? Well thats a new one. Got anything to back that
up either?

--
Spud


[email protected] May 18th 15 08:37 AM

UK faces first major train strike in 20 years
 
On Mon, 18 May 2015 07:43:46 +0100
Martin Edwards wrote:
As Orwell wrote in a different context, Scotland is no more capable of
being independent than a cat or a dog. I am not hostile to the people,
but they are being led.


The cat analogy is probably quite good. Has the pretence of independence until
its meal time, when its back at the bowl looking mournful and waiting for the
handout.

--
Spud


Robin9 May 18th 15 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric[_3_] (Post 148258)
On 2015-05-17, Robin9 wrote:
On 2015-05-15, The Real Doctor
wrote:
On 15/05/15 20:13,
d wrote:
There are some good well meaning people in the party who have genuine
concerns about control by Brussels.


Yeah, right, and the Socialist Workers' Party is full of people with a
genuine concern for the poor.

But unfortunately they're outnumbered by the idiots
and you can see what happens when idiots get voted into power - towit the
SNP.


The SNP were almost voted into power in 2007 and formed a minority
government. That was sufficiently popular that they were properly voted
into power as a majority government in 2011. That was sufficiently
popular that they were voted in to represent Scotland in 56 out of 59
Scottish constituencies this month. It's therefore a little hard to see
what disasters you think happened.

Mind you, it's always amusing to here UKIP supporters such as yourself
use precisely opposing arguments to explain why (a) Scotland MUST stay
in the UK and (b) why the UK MUST leave Europe. It sounds like a pretty
good example of cognitive dissonance which is easily resolved by
recognizing that UKIP are a bunch of loony little Englanders who loathe
all foreigners and classify Scots as foreign.


It's never amusing to hear UKIP detractors such as yourself use ill
thought-out generalisations to denigrate people who hold an alternative
opinion.

I voted UKIP ten days ago so I qualify as a UKIP supporter.

a) I do not say Scotland MUST stay in the UK;
b) I do not say UK MUST leave the European Union although I recognise
that it may be eventually become advantageous to do so;


It will never be advantageous for me personally for the UK to leave the
EU. I am sure I am a very, very long way from being the only one.

c) I am not a little Englander and I do not hate all foreigners;
d) I do not classify Scots as foreign.

I live in Leyton, one of the most cosmopolitan areas of London. I could
easily afford to move to an all-white part of the country but I choose
to
stay in Leyton.

I suggest you refrain from glib and specious generalisations and instead
try to understand why around 4 million people voted UKIP in the recent
election.


But your list above doesn't really help in understanding that. So why
did you vote UKIP?

Eric
--
ms fnd in a lbry

My "list" was a response, not an attempt to educate.

I voted UKIP because I refuse on principle to vote Tory, Labour or Liberal-
Democrat, all three of whom have no real concern either for the practicality
of running this country properly or for the well-being of the British people.

I regard the three main parties as akin to the war lords in Afghanistan:
interested in power for its own sake.


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk