Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tim Roll-Pickering" wrote in message ... tim..... wrote: One likely consequence is that some Departments may be abolished or merged. For example, on Newsnight, it was suggested that DEFRA and DCMS didn't really need to exist as separate departments at all, and a lot could be saved by abolishing hem, Really? Does abolishing a ministry, but still performing all of its functionally, save a lot? If you still need all of the "customer facing" people you still need all of the buildings that they work in, and you still need most of the management chain to manage them. All you save is the single guy at the top (and the office that (s)he sits in) More than that in that there are fewer Permanent Secretaries So there are "two" men at the top that you save. OK I do fully appreciate that the number that you will save is greater than that, but it's still barely into double figures and even though they will be at the higher end of the pay scale the savings involved are still of the relative order of "amount found down the back of the sofa". and the like and systems are merged with economies of scale. what systems can you merge with "economies of scale? and if you can, why are they not already merged across the whole of government anyway (my example of IT support really being one that I expect HMG to have got expensively wrong here). tim |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"tim....." wrote in message
... what systems can you merge with "economies of scale? Lots of functions that are common to any business - e.g. procurement, HR, finance. and if you can, why are they not already merged across the whole of government anyway (my example of IT support really being one that I expect HMG to have got expensively wrong here). A colleague of mine was telling me of a business tranformation project he worked on at a large local authority. The savings identified by merging common business functions across the LA were huge, to the extent that the consultants (of which he was one) were happy to share the risk by providing a loan to fund their fees that would be paid off from the savings after project implementation. The project was cancelled when the unions called a strike over the loss of their member's jobs that would result from the project: the politicians responded by cancelling the project. -- DAS |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
"Transport for London cuts £7.6bn from budget" | London Transport | |||
LUL Job Cuts | London Transport | |||
Calls to reconsider train cuts | London Transport | |||
"The Olympics will be late and over budget" | London Transport | |||
New freight centre cuts emissions and lorry trips by 70 per cent | London Transport News |