Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
New take on London Connections map
On 2015\12\16 18:15, Guy Gorton wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 07:48:18 +0000, Basil Jet wrote: http://www.inat.fr/metro/london/ You might find it easier to save the save it to your hard drive and use a preview or image viewer there. Mostly I like it, but some things are deplorable. The East London line through Whitechapel and the line through Cambridge Heath are the same colour and almost co-linear, so the eye follows them as a single line. Similarly, the Overground lines through Camden Road and South Hampstead acquire an imaginary Primrose Hill connection if you aren't careful. The Chiltern line is one of the lowest layers and the Met is one of the highest layers, causing odd effects where crossing other lines at Northwick Park and West Hampstead. The Southeastern services through Crofton Park are missing. But the portrayal of the West Croydon - Tulse Hill area is an improvement over the standard LC map... even if three lines of nearly the same colour crossing over the same spot just south of Selhurst is a complete disaster. Does it matter that Chiltern out of Marylebone is shown as going under various other lines whereas in nearly every case it goes over them? I wasn't referring to whether lines go over or under each other in real life. On a map, thin features should usually be drawn over fat features so that the visual discontinuity is minimised. So at West Hampstead the orange should be over the blue and purple, whereas at Northwick Park the orange and its three buddies should go under the blue and purple (the fact that these are different orange lines is irrelevant). This may require a railway line to be in a low layer in some parts of the diagram and a high layer in others, whereas I suspect he has just given each railway line a single layer globally. Another problem is Finsbury Park to Kings Cross. Anyone trying to plan a route here will certainly see the 4-stop route, and might see the 2-stop route, but the non-stop route is hard to see, partly because of multiple pointless bends and partly because the Victoria Line is practically drawn over the junction in the green line. If he must keep the NR line in that X-Y position (I see no reason why he should), then the Vic should go under it near Drayton Park and near Angel so that the Vic doesn't obscure the junction and bend, but the Vic should remain over the NR line at Finsbury Park so that the NR doesn't obscure the Vic's bend. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New tube map, new London Connections, no timetables | London Transport | |||
New London Connections map is available | London Transport | |||
New 'London Connections' map with added LO and new family member,TfL Rail | London Transport | |||
A new geographic take on the Tube map | London Transport | |||
New London Connections map... | London Transport |