London Banter

London Banter (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/forum.php)
-   London Transport (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/)
-   -   Inspector Sands and his pals (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/14739-inspector-sands-his-pals.html)

Recliner[_3_] January 15th 16 08:05 AM

Inspector Sands and his pals
 
I think we all know what an Inspector Sands call means, though I never knew
where his name came from. This article told me, and some of the other coded
PA messages on stations, ships and planes.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/tr...now-about.html

[email protected] January 15th 16 08:30 AM

Inspector Sands and his pals
 
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:05:33 -0000 (UTC)
Recliner wrote:
I think we all know what an Inspector Sands call means, though I never knew
where his name came from. This article told me, and some of the other coded


I always assumed it was because in times past they'd chuck the sand bucket on
a fire. I'm fairly sure I remember one being in a lot of stations when I was
a kid.

--
Spud



Martin Coffee January 15th 16 09:25 AM

Inspector Sands and his pals
 
On 15/01/16 09:30, d wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:05:33 -0000 (UTC)
Recliner wrote:
I think we all know what an Inspector Sands call means, though I never knew
where his name came from. This article told me, and some of the other coded


I always assumed it was because in times past they'd chuck the sand bucket on
a fire. I'm fairly sure I remember one being in a lot of stations when I was
a kid.

I assume they chucked the contents and not the bucket on the fire?

The Real Doctor January 15th 16 09:31 AM

Inspector Sands and his pals
 
On 15/01/16 09:05, Recliner wrote:
I think we all know what an Inspector Sands call means, though I never knew
where his name came from. This article told me, and some of the other coded
PA messages on stations, ships and planes.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/tr...now-about.html


In true Telegraph style, some of that is trivial:

"Hot bit - The heated part of an in-flight meal."

and some is just plain wrong:

"Flight level - "A fancy way of telling you how many thousands of feet
you are above sea level. Just add a couple of zeroes. Flight level
three-three zero is 33,000 feet.""

Why should any of the rest of it be trustworthy?

Ian


Recliner[_3_] January 15th 16 09:45 AM

Inspector Sands and his pals
 
The Real Doctor wrote:
On 15/01/16 09:05, Recliner wrote:
I think we all know what an Inspector Sands call means, though I never knew
where his name came from. This article told me, and some of the other coded
PA messages on stations, ships and planes.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/tr...now-about.html


In true Telegraph style, some of that is trivial:

"Hot bit - The heated part of an in-flight meal."

and some is just plain wrong:

"Flight level - "A fancy way of telling you how many thousands of feet
you are above sea level. Just add a couple of zeroes. Flight level
three-three zero is 33,000 feet.""


Is that wrong? [Yes, I know it's the barometric altitude, but that's not
something that's normally mentioned.]

[email protected] January 15th 16 10:25 AM

Inspector Sands and his pals
 
In article , d () wrote:

On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:05:33 -0000 (UTC)
Recliner wrote:
I think we all know what an Inspector Sands call means, though I never
knew where his name came from. This article told me, and some of the
other coded


I always assumed it was because in times past they'd chuck the sand
bucket on a fire. I'm fairly sure I remember one being in a lot of
stations when I was
a kid.


I remember sand buckets on the tube. They looked pretty ancient.

--
Colin Rosenstiel

Chris J Dixon January 15th 16 10:33 AM

Inspector Sands and his pals
 
Recliner wrote:

I think we all know what an Inspector Sands call means, though I never knew
where his name came from. This article told me, and some of the other coded
PA messages on stations, ships and planes.


Some years ago I knew some chaps who worked as cinema
projectionists. Their emergency protocol was, apparently, white
screen and play "Run Rabbit Run". I don't think it was ever
needed.

Chris
--
Chris J Dixon Nottingham UK


Plant amazing Acers.

[email protected] January 15th 16 10:39 AM

Inspector Sands and his pals
 
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 05:25:13 -0600
wrote:
In article ,
d () wrote:

On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:05:33 -0000 (UTC)
Recliner wrote:
I think we all know what an Inspector Sands call means, though I never
knew where his name came from. This article told me, and some of the
other coded


I always assumed it was because in times past they'd chuck the sand
bucket on a fire. I'm fairly sure I remember one being in a lot of
stations when I was
a kid.


I remember sand buckets on the tube. They looked pretty ancient.


IIRC they seemed to have been mostly used as a convenient place to stub out
cigarettes.

Presumably they now have a better way of putting out fires though one doesn't
see too many CO2 extinguishers around so not sure what it might be.

--
Spud



NY January 15th 16 11:11 AM

Inspector Sands and his pals
 
"Recliner" wrote in message
...
The Real Doctor wrote:
On 15/01/16 09:05, Recliner wrote:
I think we all know what an Inspector Sands call means, though I never
knew
where his name came from. This article told me, and some of the other
coded
PA messages on stations, ships and planes.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/tr...now-about.html


In true Telegraph style, some of that is trivial:

"Hot bit - The heated part of an in-flight meal."

and some is just plain wrong:

"Flight level - "A fancy way of telling you how many thousands of feet
you are above sea level. Just add a couple of zeroes. Flight level
three-three zero is 33,000 feet.""


Is that wrong? [Yes, I know it's the barometric altitude, but that's not
something that's normally mentioned.]


It's inconsistent between the general statement (which refers to thousands
of feet) and the specific example (which implies hundreds of feet). The
latter is correct: you multiply a flight level by one *hundred* to give the
height in feet.


The Real Doctor January 15th 16 11:17 AM

Inspector Sands and his pals
 
On 15/01/16 10:45, Recliner wrote:
The Real Doctor wrote:


"Flight level - "A fancy way of telling you how many thousands of feet
you are above sea level. Just add a couple of zeroes. Flight level
three-three zero is 33,000 feet.""


Is that wrong? [Yes, I know it's the barometric altitude, but that's not
something that's normally mentioned.]


Flight levels are done with the altimeter at 1013hPa, and since the
actual pressure at sea level can be +/- 50hPa and atmospheric pressure
changes at ~30 feet per hPa, FL250 (say) could be anything from 23,500 -
26,500 feet above sea level. Things have hit other things because they
got this wrong.

Ian



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk