London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #61   Report Post  
Old April 25th 16, 06:48 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,125
Default Taxu demos at KXStP

In message , at 19:24:53 on Mon, 25 Apr
2016, tim... remarked:
Unfortunately that looks like a Parking restriction, not a Waiting
restriction.

I don't think you can have a session-limited "No Waiting" sign.

As no unattended parking is allowed by the Police, what's the
difference between a Waiting and a Parking restriction?


That's not a compulsory sign, though. And the whole problem is that
the police *don't* enforce anything in practice.


surely that's because it has been "devolved" to the council


LAPE, but the things mentioned in the "Police" notice are not within
their jurisdiction.

I spent ten minutes there earlier today, and it's a toss-up between
people who think that if they put on their hazard flashers it allows
them to leave the vehicle unoccupied, or parked there for ten+ minutes
occupied; and those who do both of those, but don't stick their hazard
flashers on.
--
Roland Perry

  #63   Report Post  
Old April 25th 16, 09:08 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,990
Default Taxu demos at KXStP

Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 19:24:53 on Mon, 25 Apr
2016, tim... remarked:
Unfortunately that looks like a Parking restriction, not a Waiting
restriction.

I don't think you can have a session-limited "No Waiting" sign.

As no unattended parking is allowed by the Police, what's the
difference between a Waiting and a Parking restriction?

That's not a compulsory sign, though. And the whole problem is that
the police *don't* enforce anything in practice.


surely that's because it has been "devolved" to the council


LAPE, but the things mentioned in the "Police" notice are not within
their jurisdiction.

I spent ten minutes there earlier today, and it's a toss-up between
people who think that if they put on their hazard flashers it allows
them to leave the vehicle unoccupied, or parked there for ten+ minutes
occupied; and those who do both of those, but don't stick their hazard
flashers on.


The police are a lot more fierce about moving cars along in the Heathrow
drop off lanes. It's now much harder for mini cabs to pick up their booked
fares from those lanes than in the past.

  #65   Report Post  
Old April 25th 16, 09:31 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: May 2011
Posts: 338
Default Taxu demos at KXStP

On 25/04/2016 14:18, David Cantrell wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 06:13:47PM +0100, JNugent wrote:

There's always been a good case for the advance booking period for a
so-called "private hire car" to be at least twenty-four hours.


No there hasn't.

Imagine, for example, that you are in an industrial estate in Peckham.
There are no black cabs cruising the industrial estate looking for
passengers.

How do you get home?


By calling a cab on the telephone?




  #66   Report Post  
Old April 25th 16, 09:36 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: May 2011
Posts: 338
Default Taxu demos at KXStP

On 25/04/2016 14:18, David Cantrell wrote:

On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 06:13:47PM +0100, JNugent wrote:

There's always been a good case for the advance booking period for a
so-called "private hire car" to be at least twenty-four hours.


No there hasn't.
Imagine, for example, that you are in an industrial estate in Peckham.
There are no black cabs cruising the industrial estate looking for
passengers.
How do you get home?


The whole reason why unlicensed* "private hire cars" (so-called) can
operate with their unlicensed* drivers is a loophole in the law which
distinguishes immediate hirings from advance bookings.

Immediate hirings - taxis.

Advance bookings - taxis (of course) *or* "private hire cars".

But unless a significant minimum period for that advance booking is
established and enforced, in practice, the law prohibiting unlicensed
plying-for-hire cannot be operated properly.

[* "licensed" here means licensed as a taxi or as a taxi-driver.]
  #67   Report Post  
Old April 26th 16, 05:15 AM
Senior Member
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Feb 2011
Location: Leyton, East London
Posts: 902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Someone Somewhere View Post
On 25/04/2016 09:51, Recliner wrote:

I wonder if there's scope for Uber being held responsible for the insurance
of any ride booked through it? So, if one of its drivers turned out not to
have valid insurance, Uber would be forced to settle any claims. That way,
it might be a lot more careful about checking its drivers' insurance.

Who has actually proven that Uber are not careful about checking its
drivers' insurance?

The accusation seems to stem from FUD spread by the Black cab brigade.
Exactly. You've summed it up perfectly.
  #68   Report Post  
Old April 26th 16, 05:25 AM
Senior Member
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Feb 2011
Location: Leyton, East London
Posts: 902
Default

O. K. How about this then? A young mother is at work and
receives a phone call from her son's school. He's had a serious
accident and needs to be taken to a doctor and then probably
home. Obviously the mother needs to get to the school as
quickly as possible. Neither bus nor train will get the job done
so she needs a cab. She's in the suburbs where black cabs are
rarely found, so a minicab is the obvious mode of transport.

Our black cab propagandist wants her to wait 24 hours. I make
no comment.
  #69   Report Post  
Old April 26th 16, 11:11 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,125
Default Taxu demos at KXStP

In message
-septe
mber.org, at 21:08:12 on Mon, 25 Apr 2016, Recliner
remarked:

The police are a lot more fierce about moving cars along in the Heathrow
drop off lanes. It's now much harder for mini cabs to pick up their booked
fares from those lanes than in the past.


Not just that, but there's heaps of signage that makes it very clear
that the lanes are *drop off only* and that for pickup people should use
the short stay carparks.

Perhaps if someone were to drive a car bomb into a Glasgow station,
rather than their airport terminal, things might change.
--
Roland Perry
  #70   Report Post  
Old April 26th 16, 11:12 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,125
Default Taxu demos at KXStP

In message , at 17:59:12 on Mon, 25
Apr 2016, Robin9 remarked:
Boris Johnson introduced a one-strike-and-you're-out policy
regarding private hire drivers touting for business. If they are
caught doing it, they lose their private hire license which means
no licensed cab firm can give them work.


But the Uber drivers are mainly self-employed.
--
Roland Perry


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Taxu demos at KXStP David Walters London Transport 1 April 28th 16 12:21 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017