![]() |
|
City Airport expansion gets go-ahead - incl. new DLR rolling stock
|
City Airport expansion gets go-ahead - incl. new DLRrolling stock
Someone Somewhere wrote:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/3...-by-chancellor This shows the expanded footprint of the airport: larger terminal, much more parking space for larger aircraft, and a full length taxiway: http://www.londoncityairport.com/content/cadp/CADP%201%20Submitted%20Material/CADP%20Consolidated%20Application%20Plans/4.0%20Illustrative%20Site%20Plan.pdf Incidentally, this marks the reversal of yet another Boris policy: From http://www.standard.co.uk/news/trans...-10137328.html Toe http://www.airpor****ch.org.uk/2016/...ort-expansion/ So the government (which includes Boris) has sided with Sadiq over LCY. And as Boris is a cabinet member, he can't complain publicly. This suggests a third Heathrow runway is on the final approach... |
Quote:
|
City Airport expansion gets go-ahead - incl. new DLRrolling stock
Robin9 wrote:
'Recliner[_3_ Wrote: ;157264']Someone Somewhere wrote:- http://tinyurl.com/h6q4jsf - This shows the expanded footprint of the airport: larger terminal, much more parking space for larger aircraft, and a full length taxiway: http://tinyurl.com/jm2ajet Incidentally, this marks the reversal of yet another Boris policy: From http://tinyurl.com/hjylkar Toe http://tinyurl.com/hafnjr4 So the government (which includes Boris) has sided with Sadiq over LCY. And as Boris is a cabinet member, he can't complain publicly. This suggests a third Heathrow runway is on the final approach... He'll get Zak Goldsmith to do his grumbling for him! Yeah, the chap who ran the failed and discredited mayoral campaign. I don't think he has much influence now. |
City Airport expansion gets go-ahead - incl. new DLR rolling stock
On 2016-07-27 10:08:15 +0000, Someone Somewhere said:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/3...-by-chancellor It's too busy as it is. These days it has the feel of a nasty, overcrowded budget airport, not the exclusive private-jet feel it used to have. These days I'd use LHR instead, with the excellent new terminals. Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the @ to reply. |
City Airport expansion gets go-ahead - incl. new DLRrolling stock
Neil Williams wrote:
On 2016-07-27 10:08:15 +0000, Someone Somewhere said: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/3...-by-chancellor It's too busy as it is. These days it has the feel of a nasty, overcrowded budget airport, not the exclusive private-jet feel it used to have. These days I'd use LHR instead, with the excellent new terminals. Won't the larger terminal deal with the overcrowding? |
City Airport expansion gets go-ahead - incl. new DLR rolling stock
On 2016-07-29 03:12:06 +0000, Recliner said:
Won't the larger terminal deal with the overcrowding? I'd imagine it will to some extent, but it still won't be what it was. Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the @ to reply. |
City Airport expansion gets go-ahead - incl. new DLRrolling stock
Neil Williams wrote:
On 2016-07-29 03:12:06 +0000, Recliner said: Won't the larger terminal deal with the overcrowding? I'd imagine it will to some extent, but it still won't be what it was. No, I suppose not, but surely it will still be much more convenient than the monster Heathrow terminals, with their long distances to some gates? |
City Airport expansion gets go-ahead - incl. new DLR rolling stock
On 2016-07-29 20:16:51 +0000, Recliner said:
No, I suppose not, but surely it will still be much more convenient than the monster Heathrow terminals, with their long distances to some gates? Possibly so - will have to give it a try. I suppose it could end up like a posh Luton, or something. Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the @ to reply. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:36 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk