On 23/09/2016 11:22, Neil Williams wrote:
[...]
That has not changed - most times I've flown recently from a proper
airport (not Stansted) I have waited no longer than about 5 minutes for
security. Stansted is mismanaged, but also is not of any relevance to
BA flights from Manchester to London.

I went through security at Stansted this summer without waiting - I was
past security within five minutes of having got off the coach.

Things don't stand still.

Mizter T wrote:

On 23/09/2016 11:22, Neil Williams wrote:
[...]
That has not changed - most times I've flown recently from a proper
airport (not Stansted) I have waited no longer than about 5 minutes for
security. Stansted is mismanaged, but also is not of any relevance to
BA flights from Manchester to London.

I went through security at Stansted this summer without waiting - I was
past security within five minutes of having got off the coach.

Things don't stand still.

I spent a full hour getting through security and to the gate at Stansted
this summer. They may not stand still, but at Stansted they are entirely
capable of going backwards.

On 2016-09-23 17:15:11 +0000, Mizter T said:

I went through security at Stansted this summer without waiting - I was
past security within five minutes of having got off the coach.

I did and waited over 45 minutes, like usual. Luton can be as bad but
at least if you're in a hurry there is the facility to pay for
fast-track.

Things don't stand still.

No, but they do vary, and I have never had to wait that long at LHR
that I can remember.

Neil
--
Neil Williams
Put my first name before the @ to reply.

On 26/09/2016 11:40, Neil Williams wrote:

On 2016-09-23 17:15:11 +0000, Mizter T said:

I went through security at Stansted this summer without waiting - I
was past security within five minutes of having got off the coach.

I did and waited over 45 minutes, like usual. Luton can be as bad but
at least if you're in a hurry there is the facility to pay for fast-track.

Er, as there is at Stansted. (£5)

http://www.stanstedairport.com/at-the-airport/security/security-fasttrack/


Things don't stand still.

No, but they do vary, and I have never had to wait that long at LHR that
I can remember.

In message , at 09:07:41 on Wed, 28 Sep
2016, Mizter T remarked:
I went through security at Stansted this summer without waiting - I
was past security within five minutes of having got off the coach.

I did and waited over 45 minutes, like usual. Luton can be as bad but
at least if you're in a hurry there is the facility to pay for fast-track.

Er, as there is at Stansted. (£5)

http://www.stanstedairport.com/at-the-airport/security/security-fasttrack/

That talks about booking it - is it also available on the day (for
example if your train was late).
--
Roland Perry

On 28/09/2016 09:13, Roland Perry wrote:

In message , at 09:07:41 on Wed, 28 Sep
2016, Mizter T remarked:
I went through security at Stansted this summer without waiting - I
was past security within five minutes of having got off the coach.

I did and waited over 45 minutes, like usual. Luton can be as bad but
at least if you're in a hurry there is the facility to pay for
fast-track.

Er, as there is at Stansted. (£5)

http://www.stanstedairport.com/at-the-airport/security/security-fasttrack/

That talks about booking it - is it also available on the day (for
example if your train was late).

Yes, though the website doesn't make that clear.

There is a desk where you can pay just before the entrance to the Fast
Track channel.

On 2016-09-28 08:07:41 +0000, Mizter T said:

Er, as there is at Stansted. (£5)

http://www.stanstedairport.com/at-the-airport/security/security-fasttrack/

When did they introduce that? It certainly isn't as obviously marketed
as at Luton.

Neil
--
Neil Williams
Put my first name before the @ to reply.

"Neil Williams" wrote in message
...
On 2016-09-28 08:07:41 +0000, Mizter T said:

Er, as there is at Stansted. (£5)

http://www.stanstedairport.com/at-the-airport/security/security-fasttrack/

When did they introduce that? It certainly isn't as obviously marketed as
at Luton.


Having been to Luton 3 times [1] in the past 3 months, I can't agree that it
is obviously marketed there either

tim

[1] 6 times if you count the airside arrivals

On 2016-09-28 10:36:58 +0000, tim... said:

Having been to Luton 3 times [1] in the past 3 months, I can't agree
that it is obviously marketed there either

What, so the clearly branded ticket machines dotted around the
terminal, plus the obvious PRIORITY LANE sign over part of the security
entrance, aren't enough?

The problem at STN is that there is more than one entrance to security,
so you don't naturally pass it.

Neil
--
Neil Williams
Put my first name before the @ to reply.

"Neil Williams" wrote in message
...
On 2016-09-28 10:36:58 +0000, tim... said:

Having been to Luton 3 times [1] in the past 3 months, I can't agree that
it is obviously marketed there either

What, so the clearly branded ticket machines dotted around the terminal,

nope, didn't see them. And if you haven't pre-advertised that they are
there, why would I?

plus the obvious PRIORITY LANE sign over part of the security entrance,
aren't enough?

the presence of a priority lane does not, of itself, suggest that access is
via a charge.

at most airports it is via class of travel or FF status. That this may not
apply at Luton is not obvious to a one time user of that airport

tim