"Jarle Hammen Knudsen" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 10:12:42 -0800 (PST), piatkow
wrote:

On Sunday, 15 January 2017 16:51:43 UTC, Recliner wrote:
Jarle Hammen Knudsen wrote:
Is this in London? If so, where?

https://goo.gl/photos/FmZKU7zbA5u9hTEe8

It's from Lovejoy series 3, episode 10, first broadcast in 1992.

Primrose Hill, at a guess.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primrose_Hill

No guess, Primrose Hill

Thanks, everyone!

So it's the BT Tower on the horizon.

I notice there's no geocaches there. Is Primrose Hill part of the
royal park? For some reason The Royal Parks has decided not to allow
geocaches in their parks.

but are there any Pokémon thingies

tim



--
jhk

On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 19:53:15 -0000, "tim..."
wrote:


but are there any Pokémon thingies

No. Pokémons are only on your phone, geocaches are real physical
objects.

--
jhk

"Jarle Hammen Knudsen" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 19:53:15 -0000, "tim..."
wrote:


but are there any Pokémon thingies

No. Pokémons are only on your phone, geocaches are real physical
objects.

but their being located in certain real word incarnations of the virtual
location has upset the owners of these real world locations (apparently)

tim

tim... wrote:


"Jarle Hammen Knudsen" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 19:53:15 -0000, "tim..."
wrote:


but are there any Pokémon thingies

No. Pokémons are only on your phone, geocaches are real physical
objects.

but their being located in certain real word incarnations of the virtual
location has upset the owners of these real world locations (apparently)

Hardly surprising, is it?

In message
-sept
ember.org, at 10:27:29 on Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Recliner
remarked:
but are there any Pokémon thingies

No. Pokémons are only on your phone, geocaches are real physical
objects.

but their being located in certain real word incarnations of the virtual
location has upset the owners of these real world locations (apparently)

Hardly surprising, is it?

Especially when on private property.
--
Roland Perry

"Recliner" wrote in message
...
tim... wrote:


"Jarle Hammen Knudsen" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 19:53:15 -0000, "tim..."
wrote:


but are there any Pokémon thingies

No. Pokémons are only on your phone, geocaches are real physical
objects.

but their being located in certain real word incarnations of the virtual
location has upset the owners of these real world locations (apparently)

Hardly surprising, is it?

I was just pointing out that because they are in virtual locations doesn't
mean that the user doesn't need to be at a specific physical location

tim

In message , at 11:49:09 on Mon, 16 Jan 2017,
tim... remarked:
No. Pokémons are only on your phone, geocaches are real physical
objects.

but their being located in certain real word incarnations of the virtual
location has upset the owners of these real world locations (apparently)

Hardly surprising, is it?

I was just pointing out that because they are in virtual locations
doesn't mean that the user doesn't

also

need to be at a specific physical location

Agreed. (Or can you use a location-spoofing app?)
--
Roland Perry

Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 11:49:09 on Mon, 16 Jan 2017,
tim... remarked:
No. Pokémons are only on your phone, geocaches are real physical
objects.

but their being located in certain real word incarnations of the virtual
location has upset the owners of these real world locations (apparently)

Hardly surprising, is it?

I was just pointing out that because they are in virtual locations
doesn't mean that the user doesn't

also

need to be at a specific physical location

Agreed. (Or can you use a location-spoofing app?)

A VR headset?