Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 22:30:27 +0100
Eric wrote: On 2017-02-23, d wrote: On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 18:51:38 -0600 wrote: I'm sure that clearance issues were very much on TfL's minds. Rightly so as things are turning out with the 700s for Thameslink. Both initial trips north of Hitchin, to Peterborough and Cambridge, came to grief with lost shoes AIUI due to high ballast shoulders, in the Cambridge case at Foxton on the return journey. Why would Thameslink trains be sent up the ECML and cambridge line? Weren't there enough free slots to test on the MML? We should probably frame this one. Such a lovely demonstration of ignorance. Sorry if I have better things to do than keep up to date with the expansion of every UK train service that I don't use. -- Spud |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
GOSPEL Electrification | London Transport | |||
GOSPEL Electrification | London Transport | |||
Gospel Oak-Barking | London Transport | |||
SPECS installation in Gospel Oak? | London Transport | |||
Gospel Oak - Barking | London Transport |