Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 17:17:15 -0000 (UTC)
Recliner wrote: wrote: On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:15:42 -0000 (UTC) Recliner wrote: wrote: On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 08:15:01 -0600 wrote: "electrification of the Gospel Oak to Barking rail corridor, to improve a key freight corridor and improving reliability for passengers. " And 378s won't be used on GOBLIN either. Are they planning on buying a whole new set of EMUs just for the goblin then? No I find that hard to believe. Do you *really* not know what trains are being built for the line? Unlike you I have a job to do and don't spend my life researching every little piece of obscure information about railways. With your expert knowledge of LO, the Goblin, UK railfreight and electric traction, you must be right. But the people actually putting up the money thought differently. If only they had had access to some expert consulting from you! Ah yes, the people putting in the money. The ones who made sure specs were being followed in the installation of the wiring. Would those be the guys? You seem to have, even by your standards, a rather poor understanding of the difference between putting up the money, and on-the-ground engineering. I suppose, as always, ignorance is your defence. Ah ok. So TfL shouldn't have bothered checking how things were progressing or putting any men on the ground to double check the work? You should apply for a job there, you'd be a shoe in. -- Spud |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Network Rail "incorrectly designed" the Gospel Oak - | London Transport | |||
Network Rail "incorrectly designed" the Gospel Oak - | London Transport | |||
Gospel Oak-Barking | London Transport | |||
SPECS installation in Gospel Oak? | London Transport | |||
Gospel Oak - Barking | London Transport |