| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
 |
|
Menu
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
February 11th 17, 11:05 PM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
Network Rail "incorrectly designed" the Gospel Oak -
|
|
#2
February 11th 17, 11:14 PM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
Network Rail "incorrectly designed" the Gospel Oak -
wrote:
In article -septembe r.org, (Recliner) wrote: wrote: I think the problems were well known, hence the limited use. Some HS1 use was included though, was it not? I think some problems were known, but not the ones that GBRf discovered when it initially put them into service with the sleeper trains. Yes, they've had some limited use on HS1, as they're the only UK locos equipped to run on it, aren't they? Good point, or are some 66s fitted with the cab signalling system? No, I don't think any class 66s are fitted with TVM430 signalling, so they can only run on HS1 in a possession. A few 92s have been fitted, which gives them a freight monopoly on the line. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Network Rail "incorrectly designed" the Gospel Oak - Barkingimprovements | London Transport | |||
| Network Rail "incorrectly designed" the Gospel Oak - | London Transport | |||
| Gospel Oak-Barking | London Transport | |||
| SPECS installation in Gospel Oak? | London Transport | |||
| Gospel Oak - Barking | London Transport | |||
Linear Mode
