Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
In article -septembe r.org, (Recliner) wrote: wrote: In article - september.org, (Recliner) wrote: wrote: In article - september.org, (Recliner) wrote: Charles Ellson wrote: On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 09:29:09 +0000 (UTC), d wrote: On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 07:48:39 +0000 Basil Jet wrote: Does anyone know when Barbican ceased to be served by Thameslink trains FROM Moorgate? All of the web resources suggest that Barbican was served by Thameslink trains in both directions until 2009, but I know that platform 4 was out of use for at least a decade before the junction at Farringdon closed. Sounds reasonable. I used to use the circle line about 15 years ago and P4 was out of use even then. On a related note, does anyone know the fate of that branch? Are LU still going to take it over and use it for sidings when crossrail is done, or has that fallen by the wayside? Some has been built over, some is used for storage and ISTR might be used for additional sidings. Seen on Twitter today -- new LU sidings being built at Farringdon: Track renewals at Farringdon - first phase installation of a new modular double junction and sidings roads https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C4YhuGaWIAA6BE9?format=jpg&name=large Replacing earlier sidings which were taken up because they were too short, surely? Yes, I think so. Presumably there's now room for longer ones, with the WL tracks gone. Presumably but it's not clear to me from the angle of the shot where the sidings will end up. More pics: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C4ZxRUeX...jpg&name=large Is that Farringdon in the background of the first two of those pictures? Yes, that's where this weekend's work is. I don't think LU has any use for the CWL formation for its tracks east of that area. Any of the former track bed not needed by Crossrail will no doubt find a commercial use between Barbican and Moorgate. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 02:06:57 -0000 (UTC)
Recliner wrote: wrote: Is that Farringdon in the background of the first two of those pictures? Yes, that's where this weekend's work is. I don't think LU has any use for the CWL formation for its tracks east of that area. Any of the former track bed not needed by Crossrail will no doubt find a commercial use between Barbican and Moorgate. That seems a bit shortsighted IMO. There's always a use for a new diversion line, stabling and reversing facilities for when the circle craps out again. -- Spud |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 12:38:42 +0000
Recliner wrote: On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 10:26:09 +0000 (UTC), d wrote: On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 02:06:57 -0000 (UTC) Recliner wrote: wrote: Is that Farringdon in the background of the first two of those pictures? Yes, that's where this weekend's work is. I don't think LU has any use for the CWL formation for its tracks east of that area. Any of the former track bed not needed by Crossrail will no doubt find a commercial use between Barbican and Moorgate. That seems a bit shortsighted IMO. There's always a use for a new diversion line, stabling and reversing facilities for when the circle craps out again. That's what they're reinstating at Farringdon. They already have a spare (reversing) platform at Moorgate. 2 IIRC. But they're not much use if a train breaks down between moorgate and farringdon. Since the right of way is there and most of the track is there it seems foolish to me to bin them. -- Spud |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Barbican Thameslink service | London Transport | |||
Barbican Thameslink service | London Transport | |||
Barbican Thameslink service | London Transport | |||
Barbican station closure? | London Transport | |||
Official vandalism at Barbican | London Transport |