|
Heathrow T5 Transit photos
On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 12:51:41 +0000, Roland Perry
wrote: In message , at 11:20:49 on Sat, 25 Mar 2017, Recliner remarked: Maybe you are over-conditioned to these unnecessary route-marches. Well, I know it's significantly better than any other large terminal I use, and I've used a lot, including Singapore, Hong Kong, Beijing, etc. I'm curious why you hate it so much, given that you've hardly any experience of it? The excessive walk the first time I landed there. When I've met people off flights, it's a shame the exit from customs is the other end of the building to the train stations. It would indeed be so if it were true, but it's not. Are you sure you've even been to T5? Your memories of it are so far divorced from reality that I wonder if you only imagine having been there. Or perhaps you had a bad lag on your visit to it, long ago, and had trouble walking? Here's the reality: From international arrivals, it's a short walk to the HEx exit (less than one sixth of the terminal length), and a slightly longer one to the Tube (less than a quarter of the terminal length). It's the other way round from domestic arrivals. The station for the future western rail link will be directly opposite the customs exit. Incidentally, what makes the walk longer than it needs to be is the arrivals 'duty free' (sic) shop that you have to walk through. Without that, the northern customs exit would be almost directly opposite to the HEx exit. Of course, apart from the shop's revenue aspect, they may not have wanted the crowd of meeters and greeters to be clustered directly in front of, and possibly blocking, the HEx exit. In all cases, the distances to the railway stations are less than any of the other Heathrow or Gatwick terminals. By far the worst in LHR is the T3 link to the central Tube station. See the last page of http://www.heathrow.com/file_source/Heathrow/Static/PDF/Maps/Heathrow_T5_Map.pdf |
Heathrow T5 Transit photos
In message , at 14:55:53 on
Sat, 25 Mar 2017, Recliner remarked: From international arrivals, When I was there people emerged from the customs, and were faced with a left-right barrier, with greeters crowding along it. Most people then carried on in the direction the majority exited from #11 and ended up being met near #13. So you have to add #11 to #13, and back again. it's a short walk to the HEx exit (less than one sixth of the terminal length), and a slightly longer one to the Tube (less than a quarter of the terminal length). Both are in the northern quartile of the terminal. See the last page of http://www.heathrow.com/file_source/Heathrow/Static/PDF/Maps/Heathrow_T5_Map.pdf -- Roland Perry |
Heathrow T5 Transit photos
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 14:55:53 on Sat, 25 Mar 2017, Recliner remarked: From international arrivals, When I was there people emerged from the customs, and were faced with a left-right barrier, with greeters crowding along it. Most people then carried on in the direction the majority exited from #11 and ended up being met near #13. So you have to add #11 to #13, and back again. No, that's a mistake travellers don't make twice. If you're not being met, there's no need to walk along the line of meeters and greeters in the wrong direction. Regular (or even second-time) users take the best exit (the northern customs exit from the baggage hall, and take the first right on exit). it's a short walk to the HEx exit (less than one sixth of the terminal length), and a slightly longer one to the Tube (less than a quarter of the terminal length). Both are in the northern quartile of the terminal. No, only the Tube entrance is in the northern quartile. The HEx entrance is about a third of the way along, while the best customs exit is just north of the centre. That makes the distance between the customs exit and the HEx entrance very short, though still longer than it needs to be. It'll be even easier to access the new western rail link station when/if it opens in a few years time. One other thing I should have mentioned: HAL stations its HEx ticket touts in the 'duty-free' shop, going it another reason not to let you bypass the shop. See the last page of http://www.heathrow.com/file_source/Heathrow/Static/PDF/Maps/Heathrow_T5_Map.pdf |
Heathrow T5 Transit photos
On 25.03.17 1:58, Recliner wrote:
John Levine wrote: In article , Richard J. wrote: Recliner wrote on 24 Mar 2017 at 13:11 ... For anyone who's interested, I've uploaded a set of photos I took recently of the underground railway that links Heathrow T5 and its two satellite terminals. The rubber-tyred railway isn't visible to anyone not using the satellites. The two satellites are mainly used by long-haul, wide-body flights (most European flights use the main terminal): https://www.flickr.com/photos/reclin...57679819076761 Thanks for the photos. I recall that when the transit first opened, Heathrow Airport claimed that the "very long" escalators from the main termainal were the longest in London, longer than the longest LU escalators at Angel. It's slightly frustrating not to have an external view of these rubber-tyred trains (trams?), but I guess that's not possible for the public. Apparently they look like this: ... Here's Bombardier's description. http://www.bombardier.com/en/transpo...le-movers.html They've installed larger systems with the same equipment at the Dallas-Fort Worth and Phoenix airports in the U.S. I've ridden the Dallas one. Yes, the current Heathrow T5 installation is quite modest: relatively short, all underground, all within one terminal, flat and straight (apart from the crossovers). But it's likely to grow as T2 expands, and again when when (if) the third runway with associated terminal is built. I've ridden the DFW system, but a long time ago, and almost certainly an older generation of trains. Ditto Phoenix. What are the prospects for PRT development at T5, or even to other terminals? |
Heathrow T5 Transit photos
On 25.03.17 9:31, Recliner wrote:
Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 21:40:59 on Fri, 24 Mar 2017, Richard J. remarked: I recall that when the transit first opened, Heathrow Airport claimed that the "very long" escalators from the main termainal were the longest in London, longer than the longest LU escalators at Angel. The escalators in recliner's pictures don't look that long. But I'm convinced the layout at T5, which extends the idea of making people travel the maximum distance they'll tolerate to and from gates, is to allow them to be more leisurely about their baggage handling. There's less walking in T5 than in most other large terminals, such as LHR T2, either Gatwick terminal or Madrid Barajas T4. It's a very well-designed terminal that's a pleasure to use (and I'm a regular user of it, which I don't think you are). As for the length of the departures escalator, do you really think this doesn't look very long? https://www.flickr.com/photos/reclin...6761/lightbox/ Here's another pic: https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2162/2...56a8379188.jpg It goes through the equivalent of five high floors: https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/w/images/b/b2/xHeathrow_terminal_5_section.jpg.pagespeed.ic.0TNb Vhu1wB.jpg http://www.e-architect.co.uk/images/..._concept4a.jpg The Wikipedia page claims, without attribution, that "the escalators are also the longest in the United Kingdom, longer than those at Angel tube station on the London Underground, which had held the title since 1992". https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ange...ion#Escalators Thus, the longest ones in Western Europe? They've still got nothing compared with the Pyongyang Metro, which reportedly has the world's longest escalator. |
Heathrow T5 Transit photos
LHS1 wrote:
On 25.03.17 1:58, Recliner wrote: John Levine wrote: In article , Richard J. wrote: Recliner wrote on 24 Mar 2017 at 13:11 ... For anyone who's interested, I've uploaded a set of photos I took recently of the underground railway that links Heathrow T5 and its two satellite terminals. The rubber-tyred railway isn't visible to anyone not using the satellites. The two satellites are mainly used by long-haul, wide-body flights (most European flights use the main terminal): https://www.flickr.com/photos/reclin...57679819076761 Thanks for the photos. I recall that when the transit first opened, Heathrow Airport claimed that the "very long" escalators from the main termainal were the longest in London, longer than the longest LU escalators at Angel. It's slightly frustrating not to have an external view of these rubber-tyred trains (trams?), but I guess that's not possible for the public. Apparently they look like this: ... Here's Bombardier's description. http://www.bombardier.com/en/transpo...le-movers.html They've installed larger systems with the same equipment at the Dallas-Fort Worth and Phoenix airports in the U.S. I've ridden the Dallas one. Yes, the current Heathrow T5 installation is quite modest: relatively short, all underground, all within one terminal, flat and straight (apart from the crossovers). But it's likely to grow as T2 expands, and again when when (if) the third runway with associated terminal is built. I've ridden the DFW system, but a long time ago, and almost certainly an older generation of trains. Ditto Phoenix. What are the prospects for PRT development at T5, or even to other terminals? Pretty low, I think. The current T5 PRT system was supposed to be the first stage of a much bigger system to link all the terminals to the business car parks, in order to reduce the number of shuttle buses. It might even have been part of the planning conditions for T5. But I don't think anything has been heard of such expansion plans since T5 opened. A certain awol cynical member of this group predicted exactly that, and I'm sad to say he appears to have been proved right. But I fear Mr Polson won't be along shortly to say, "I told you so". |
Heathrow T5 Transit photos
On 25.03.17 17:31, Recliner wrote:
wrote: On 25.03.17 9:31, Recliner wrote: Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 21:40:59 on Fri, 24 Mar 2017, Richard J. remarked: I recall that when the transit first opened, Heathrow Airport claimed that the "very long" escalators from the main termainal were the longest in London, longer than the longest LU escalators at Angel. The escalators in recliner's pictures don't look that long. But I'm convinced the layout at T5, which extends the idea of making people travel the maximum distance they'll tolerate to and from gates, is to allow them to be more leisurely about their baggage handling. There's less walking in T5 than in most other large terminals, such as LHR T2, either Gatwick terminal or Madrid Barajas T4. It's a very well-designed terminal that's a pleasure to use (and I'm a regular user of it, which I don't think you are). As for the length of the departures escalator, do you really think this doesn't look very long? https://www.flickr.com/photos/reclin...6761/lightbox/ Here's another pic: https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2162/2...56a8379188.jpg It goes through the equivalent of five high floors: https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/w/images/b/b2/xHeathrow_terminal_5_section.jpg.pagespeed.ic.0TNb Vhu1wB.jpg http://www.e-architect.co.uk/images/..._concept4a.jpg The Wikipedia page claims, without attribution, that "the escalators are also the longest in the United Kingdom, longer than those at Angel tube station on the London Underground, which had held the title since 1992". https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ange...ion#Escalators Thus, the longest ones in Western Europe? They've still got nothing compared with the Pyongyang Metro, which reportedly has the world's longest escalator. This one? https://www.flickr.com/photos/recliner/8717487216/in/album-72157633424928749/lightbox/ https://www.flickr.com/photos/recliner/8717486808/in/album-72157633424928749/lightbox/ Being so long, no-one attempts to walk up or even down it. Where is that, Puhung? There is one station on that network, though I don't think that it's Puhung, which has what is the world's longest escalator. On a side note, I would love to find one of the old metro tokens from the Pyongyang Metro. |
Heathrow T5 Transit photos
wrote:
On 25.03.17 17:31, Recliner wrote: wrote: On 25.03.17 9:31, Recliner wrote: Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 21:40:59 on Fri, 24 Mar 2017, Richard J. remarked: I recall that when the transit first opened, Heathrow Airport claimed that the "very long" escalators from the main termainal were the longest in London, longer than the longest LU escalators at Angel. The escalators in recliner's pictures don't look that long. But I'm convinced the layout at T5, which extends the idea of making people travel the maximum distance they'll tolerate to and from gates, is to allow them to be more leisurely about their baggage handling. There's less walking in T5 than in most other large terminals, such as LHR T2, either Gatwick terminal or Madrid Barajas T4. It's a very well-designed terminal that's a pleasure to use (and I'm a regular user of it, which I don't think you are). As for the length of the departures escalator, do you really think this doesn't look very long? https://www.flickr.com/photos/reclin...6761/lightbox/ Here's another pic: https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2162/2...56a8379188.jpg It goes through the equivalent of five high floors: https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/w/images/b/b2/xHeathrow_terminal_5_section.jpg.pagespeed.ic.0TNb Vhu1wB.jpg http://www.e-architect.co.uk/images/..._concept4a.jpg The Wikipedia page claims, without attribution, that "the escalators are also the longest in the United Kingdom, longer than those at Angel tube station on the London Underground, which had held the title since 1992". https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ange...ion#Escalators Thus, the longest ones in Western Europe? They've still got nothing compared with the Pyongyang Metro, which reportedly has the world's longest escalator. This one? https://www.flickr.com/photos/recliner/8717487216/in/album-72157633424928749/lightbox/ https://www.flickr.com/photos/recliner/8717486808/in/album-72157633424928749/lightbox/ Being so long, no-one attempts to walk up or even down it. Where is that, Puhung? Yes, PuhÅ*ng. There is one station on that network, though I don't think that it's Puhung, which has what is the world's longest escalator. I don't know if it's longer, but here's one I took at Kaeson station: https://www.flickr.com/photos/recliner/8717502198/in/album-72157633424928749/lightbox/ Pyongyang is fairly flat, so I wouldn't have thought there'd be much difference in escalator lengths. But it does raise a question: who made them? I'm guessing it must be a Chinese company. I doubt that North Korea was capable of making the world's longest escalators back in 1970. On a side note, I would love to find one of the old metro tokens from the Pyongyang Metro. Sorry, can't help there. |
Heathrow T5 Transit photos
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 22:13:51 -0000 (UTC)
Recliner wrote: Yes, that looks right. From memory, I think the trains have four (or five) carriages. The much more visible elevated Gatwick inter-terminal shuttle trains have three carriages. Unlike the Gatwick shuttle, there are points, so trains can switch track, and the number of trains isnt limited to two. There's obvious scope for the line to be extended to a future third satellite or linked to a rebuilt central terminal. One thing that may or not be obvious from the pics is that the Transit is very clean and well maintained; it still looks brand new, despite being almost a decade old. I wonder where "people mover" ends and metro train begins? These vehicles seem to be in that grey area somewhere in between though the VAL metros in france are pretty much the same except ridiculously narrow (presumably for tunneling cost reasons). -- Spud |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 08:53 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk