So no jubilee line strike after all
 

On 6 Jun 2018 22:10:40 GMT
Marland wrote:
wrote:

"So ..." in 2018 is the same as "Well ..." in 1918. It is an annoying,
no-benefit, substitution - but nugatory compared to the oh-so-excrescent
media favourite "existential"

Anything is better than someone who inserts "like" after every 3rd word,
often followed either by "totally" or "awesome". Or both.


Or that utterance that seems to be a favourite with the type of people who
could audition for an appearance on the Jeremy Kyle show.
“Know what I mean� , Yes it means you are thick , now **** off.

Very true, however in Kyle land saying a whole 4 words in a row makes you
an intellectual. Far better one should end (and often begin) sentences with
"init" in order not to confuse ones peers.

So no jubilee line strike after all
 

wrote in message ...
On 6 Jun 2018 22:10:40 GMT
Marland wrote:
wrote:

"So ..." in 2018 is the same as "Well ..." in 1918. It is an annoying,
no-benefit, substitution - but nugatory compared to the
oh-so-excrescent
media favourite "existential"

Anything is better than someone who inserts "like" after every 3rd word,
often followed either by "totally" or "awesome". Or both.


Or that utterance that seems to be a favourite with the type of people who
could audition for an appearance on the Jeremy Kyle show.
â?oKnow what I meanâ?� , Yes it means you are thick , now **** off.

Very true, however in Kyle land saying a whole 4 words in a row makes you
an intellectual. Far better one should end (and often begin) sentences
with
"init" in order not to confuse ones peers.

isn't it spelt innit?

tim

So no jubilee line strike after all
 

On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 13:36:06 +0100
"tim..." wrote:
wrote in message ...
On 6 Jun 2018 22:10:40 GMT
Marland wrote:
wrote:

"So ..." in 2018 is the same as "Well ..." in 1918. It is an annoying,
no-benefit, substitution - but nugatory compared to the
oh-so-excrescent
media favourite "existential"

Anything is better than someone who inserts "like" after every 3rd word,
often followed either by "totally" or "awesome". Or both.


Or that utterance that seems to be a favourite with the type of people who
could audition for an appearance on the Jeremy Kyle show.
â?oKnow what I meanâ?� , Yes it means you are thick , now **** off.

Very true, however in Kyle land saying a whole 4 words in a row makes you
an intellectual. Far better one should end (and often begin) sentences
with
"init" in order not to confuse ones peers.

isn't it spelt innit?

Somehow I suspect the spelling is flexible.

So no jubilee line strike after all
 

On 07/06/2018 13:53, wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 13:36:06 +0100
"tim..." wrote:

isn't it spelt innit?

Somehow I suspect the spelling is flexible.

The Oxford English Dictionary admits no alternatives to "innit", but
then it has standards even for such nonstandard words.

--
Robin
reply-to address is (intended to be) valid

So no jubilee line strike after all
 

On 2018\06\06 14:40, Graeme Wall wrote:
On 06/06/2018 11:01, Scott wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 09:37:27 +0000 (UTC), wrote:

More empty threats from the RMT or did the lazy bolshevics not get
enough
support from the sane section of their membership and decided to save
face
instead?

So why do people insist on starting sentences with the word 'so'?


So what if they do?

So predictable.

--
Basil Jet - listening to music from 1981(A-F) ... A Certain Ratio - Adam
& The Ants - Altered Images - Art Objects - Artery - Bauhaus - Blurt -
Brian Eno & David Byrne - Cabaret Voltaire - Chrome - Clock DVA -
Cluster - Concrete - Conrad Schnitzler - David Thomas & The Pedestrians
- Delta 5 - Depeche Mode - Der Plan - Dinosaur L (Arthur Russell) - Echo
& The Bunnymen - Einstürzende Neubauten - Fire Engines - Flux Of Pink
Indians - Fred Frith