Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 10:12:30 on Sat, 25
Aug 2018, Robin9 remarked: I've always been deeply sceptical about the 24 tph schedule through "the core" as to both its feasibility and its necessity. Is 24 tph a prerequisite for the Kings Cross throat project? In the long run 24tph is a prerequisite for 6tph to Cambridge/Kings Lynn. (Up from 4tph last year). In the short run they could make do with 23tph in the core by postponing the increase from the current 5tph to 6tph, and in any event that 6th train is to Brighton, so doesn't impact Kings Cross. And if that's not enough of a relaxation, they can always postpone some of the MMLSouthern through running which also contributes to the increase from [whatever pre-Dec19] to 24tph overall. What they do need, however, is to increase [whatever is the core tph today] by two, to get the two currently-KGX-terminating slows into the core. -- Roland Perry |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Thameslink ATO Specification published | London Transport | |||
Jubilee ATO | London Transport | |||
How can you have a signal failure on an ATO system? | London Transport |