And what 'engines' would those be? ;-))

Exactly what I said to the Fleet Manager this morning, it seems he was the
"Spokesman" in the news article and told the staff and the media 2 diffrent
things
--
To reply direct, remove NOSPAM and replace with railwaysonline
For Railway Information, News & Photos check out the Award Winning Railways
Online at http://www.railways-online.co.uk

Joe wrote:
And what 'engines' would those be? ;-))

Exactly what I said to the Fleet Manager this morning, it seems he
was the "Spokesman" in the news article and told the staff and the
media 2 diffrent things

Perhaps you could ask him why c2c attempted to blame the problem on an
unusually rapid air pressure increase. I've had a look at the Met
Office data for Shoeburyness for the night in question (Sun/Mon 18/19
April), and the pressure rose from 982mb at 22:00* Sunday to 992mb at
11:00 Monday. The Met Office uses words to describe the change in
pressure according to the size of rise or fall over 3 hours. The
fastest rises in any 3-hour period were of 3mb (22:00-01:00,
05:00-08:00, 06:00-09:00). There is nothing unusual about that. It
would take a rise of double that rate to qualify as a "very rapid" rise
in Met Office parlance.

* All times BST.

--
Richard J.
(to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address)

In article ,
(Joe) wrote:

And what 'engines' would those be? ;-))

Exactly what I said to the Fleet Manager this morning, it seems he was
the "Spokesman" in the news article and told the staff and the media 2
diffrent things

357s run Windows 95. What do you expect?!

--
Colin Rosenstiel