Latest Heathrow master plan
On 14/12/2019 20:52, Marland wrote:
wrote: On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 10:12:42 +0000 Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 09:18:56 on Sat, 14 Dec 2019, remarked: On Fri, 13 Dec 2019 21:18:51 +0000 "Clive D.W. Feather" wrote: In article , writes As I said if anyobe had bothered to read - I have relatives living in a village near Huntingdon directly impacted by this bloody bypass. The amount of farmland concreted over for it just so some drivers can save 15 mins is obscene and thats before the extra pollution and noise is taken into account. I don't know how much farmland is actually being taken long-term (I do have the scheme plans, but I have better things to do), but there will actually be *less* pollution and noise because people won't be sitting in almost-stationary cars for ages with their engines running. Ah, the old build more roads to solve congestion and pollution fallacy. If planned properly, they work fine. Sure, it all goes to plan for a few years. Then ever more people start to use the route and in a decade or so you're back where you started except now the jams have twice as many cars with twice the pollution. The best example of this in the UK is the M25. No matter how much they widen it it just jams up again in a few years. It has 6 lanes each way around Heathrow yet they're still often jammed solid in the rush hour. So what do you do, widen it to 8 lanes, 10? Where does it stop? By stopping people breeding or the population increasing by immigration. We entered a period of what is going to be a generation of political upheaval partly to deal with the expectations by some that the latter can be managed in some way that pleases them. The other can only be done in a civilised society by encouragement . If people have only two children they are just replacing themselves but many have more. Actually the replacement rate is about 2.4 children per couple to allow for infertility, , infant mortality, gay couples and those who just don't want children. Currently the average is nearer 1.8 so in the long term the population of this country is going to shrink fairly rapidly. The downside is the population is getting older. It's a phenomenon that is being repeated across the world as people get better educated and the religious ties are loosened. -- Graeme Wall This account not read. |
Latest Heathrow master plan
On 14/12/2019 21:55, Graeme Wall wrote:
Actually the replacement rate is about 2.4 children per couple to allow for infertility, , infant mortality, gay couples and those who just don't want children. Currently the average is nearer 1.8 so in the long term the population of this country is going to shrink fairly rapidly. The downside is the population is getting older. It's a phenomenon that is being repeated across the world as people get better educated and the religious ties are loosened. I don't know what you mean by "long term" but the ONS project the population of the UK continuing to increase through to 2043. -- Robin reply-to address is (intended to be) valid |
Latest Heathrow master plan
On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 17:22:53 +0000
Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 16:58:48 on Sat, 14 Dec 2019, remarked: Sure, it all goes to plan for a few years. Then ever more people start to use the route and in a decade or so you're back where you started except now the jams have twice as many cars with twice the pollution. The best example of this in the UK is the M25. No matter how much they widen it it just jams up again in a few years. It has 6 lanes each way around Heathrow yet they're still often jammed solid in the rush hour. So what do you do, widen it to 8 lanes, 10? Where does it stop? When they plan it better and segregate the long distance and local traffic. The problem with that bit of the M25 (and I lived *there* 25yrs ago and saw it first hand) was mixing them up. And how do you plan to segregate them? Either you allow local traffic onto the M25 or you close the junctions. The newest bit of A14 (remember, the road we are discussing) segregates them, just as the A1(M) north of Huntingdon does, the road which hasn't shown any sign of jamming up 20yrs later. I doubt many people use the A1 for long distance travel in the south or midlands as there are too many roundabouts, too much slowing down and speeding up and too many selfish truckers doing the tortoise race holding up a quarter mile of traffic as they pass each other at 0.5mph difference in order to gain 1 minute that they immediately lose at the next roundabout anyway. |
Latest Heathrow master plan
On 15/12/2019 09:19, Robin wrote:
On 14/12/2019 21:55, Graeme Wall wrote: Actually the replacement rate is about 2.4 children per couple to allow for infertility, , infant mortality, gay couples and those who just don't want children. Currently the average is nearer 1.8 so in the long term the population of this country is going to shrink fairly rapidly. The downside is the population is getting older. It's a phenomenon that is being repeated across the world as people get better educated and the religious ties are loosened. I don't know what you mean by "long term" but the ONS project the population of the UK continuing to increase through to 2043. After the middle of the century as the offspring of the baby boomers start to die out and the influence of effective contraception took hold from the mid 1960s onward. -- Graeme Wall This account not read. |
Latest Heathrow master plan
On 15/12/2019 10:25, Graeme Wall wrote:
On 15/12/2019 09:19, Robin wrote: On 14/12/2019 21:55, Graeme Wall wrote: Actually the replacement rate is about 2.4 children per couple to allow for infertility, , infant mortality, gay couples and those who just don't want children. Currently the average is nearer 1.8 so in the long term the population of this country is going to shrink fairly rapidly. The downside is the population is getting older. It's a phenomenon that is being repeated across the world as people get better educated and the religious ties are loosened. I don't know what you mean by "long term" but the ONS project the population of the UK continuing to increase through to 2043. After the middle of the century as the offspring of the baby boomers start to die out and the influence of effective contraception took hold from the mid 1960s onward. Thanks for calibrating "long term". While you may of course be right I'll merely note that the statisticians at Eurostat do not agree. They project the UK population continuing to increase (albeit more slowly) through to 2100. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/po...ta/main-tables -- Robin reply-to address is (intended to be) valid |
Latest Heathrow master plan
On 15/12/2019 10:44, Robin wrote:
On 15/12/2019 10:25, Graeme Wall wrote: On 15/12/2019 09:19, Robin wrote: On 14/12/2019 21:55, Graeme Wall wrote: Actually the replacement rate is about 2.4 children per couple to allow for infertility, , infant mortality, gay couples and those who just don't want children. Currently the average is nearer 1.8 so in the long term the population of this country is going to shrink fairly rapidly. The downside is the population is getting older. It's a phenomenon that is being repeated across the world as people get better educated and the religious ties are loosened. I don't know what you mean by "long term" but the ONS project the population of the UK continuing to increase through to 2043. After the middle of the century as the offspring of the baby boomers start to die out and the influence of effective contraception took hold from the mid 1960s onward. Thanks for calibrating "long term". While you may of course be right I'll merely note that the statisticians at Eurostat do not agree.Â* They project the UK population continuing to increase (albeit more slowly) through to 2100. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/po...ta/main-tables A quick look at the fertility table shows the rate in the UK varying from a low of 1.27 in inner London to a high of 1.97 in outer London for 2017. The general trend is consistently falling across the country over the 5 year period on the chart. -- Graeme Wall This account not read. |
Latest Heathrow master plan
On 15/12/2019 11:24, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 09:59:22 on Sun, 15 Dec 2019, remarked: On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 17:22:53 +0000 Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 16:58:48 on Sat, 14 Dec 2019, remarked: Sure, it all goes to plan for a few years. Then ever more people start to use the route and in a decade or so you're back where you started except now the jams have twice as many cars with twice the pollution. The best example of this in the UK is the M25. No matter how much they widen it it just jams up again in a few years. It has 6 lanes each way around Heathrow yet they're still often jammed solid in the rush hour. So what do you do, widen it to 8 lanes, 10? Where does it stop? When they plan it better and segregate the long distance and local traffic. The problem with that bit of the M25 (and I lived *there* 25yrs ago and saw it first hand) was mixing them up. And how do you plan to segregate them? Either you allow local traffic onto the M25 or you close the junctions. You build a local road in parallel. Where? There are already local rads in parallel and they are swamped too. The newest bit of A14 (remember, the road we are discussing) segregates them, just as the A1(M) north of Huntingdon does, the road which hasn't shown any sign of jamming up 20yrs later. I doubt many people use the A1 for long distance travel in the south or midlands as there are too many roundabouts, Almost none left now. too much slowing down and speeding up and too many selfish truckers doing the tortoise race holding up a quarter mile of traffic as they pass each other at 0.5mph difference in order to gain 1 minute that they immediately lose at the next roundabout anyway. There typically isn't a "next roundabout", but I agree that HGV-races are a pain, and hence why some roads (like the new A14, and the 20yr old A1(M) in north Cambs) are built with more than 2 lanes. They tried banning HGVs from the outside lane on a hilly section of the A34 around Didcot. It was routinely ignored and TVP didn't have the resources or inclination to police it properly. -- Graeme Wall This account not read. |
Latest Heathrow master plan
In message , at 11:45:31 on Sun, 15 Dec
2019, Graeme Wall remarked: On 15/12/2019 11:24, Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 09:59:22 on Sun, 15 Dec 2019, remarked: On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 17:22:53 +0000 Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 16:58:48 on Sat, 14 Dec 2019, remarked: Sure, it all goes to plan for a few years. Then ever more people start to use the route and in a decade or so you're back where you started except now the jams have twice as many cars with twice the pollution. The best example of this in the UK is the M25. No matter how much they widen it it just jams up again in a few years. It has 6 lanes each way around Heathrow yet they're still often jammed solid in the rush hour. So what do you do, widen it to 8 lanes, 10? Where does it stop? When they plan it better and segregate the long distance and local traffic. The problem with that bit of the M25 (and I lived *there* 25yrs ago and saw it first hand) was mixing them up. And how do you plan to segregate them? Either you allow local traffic onto the M25 or you close the junctions. You build a local road in parallel. Where? There are already local rads in parallel and they are swamped too. There are legacy local roads well away from the M25 corridor itself. None that I'm aware of newly built as M25 local relief roads. The newest bit of A14 (remember, the road we are discussing) segregates them, just as the A1(M) north of Huntingdon does, the road which hasn't shown any sign of jamming up 20yrs later. I doubt many people use the A1 for long distance travel in the south or midlands as there are too many roundabouts, Almost none left now. too much slowing down and speeding up and too many selfish truckers doing the tortoise race holding up a quarter mile of traffic as they pass each other at 0.5mph difference in order to gain 1 minute that they immediately lose at the next roundabout anyway. There typically isn't a "next roundabout", but I agree that HGV-races are a pain, and hence why some roads (like the new A14, and the 20yr old A1(M) in north Cambs) are built with more than 2 lanes. They tried banning HGVs from the outside lane on a hilly section of the A34 around Didcot. That's only 2-lane, I think. Or are you saying HGVs are racing also in a third lane? It was routinely ignored and TVP didn't have the resources or inclination to police it properly. If they can catch and ANPR people speeding in any lane, they can issue tickets to HGVs in the 'wrong' lane. -- Roland Perry |
Latest Heathrow master plan
On 15/12/2019 11:56, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 11:45:31 on Sun, 15 Dec 2019, Graeme Wall remarked: On 15/12/2019 11:24, Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 09:59:22 on Sun, 15 Dec 2019, remarked: On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 17:22:53 +0000 Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 16:58:48 on Sat, 14 Dec 2019, remarked: Sure, it all goes to plan for a few years. Then ever more people start to use the route and in a decade or so you're back where you started exceptÂ* now the jams have twice as many cars with twice the pollution. The best example of this in the UK is the M25. No matter how much they widen it it just jamsÂ* up again in a few years. It has 6 lanes each way around Heathrow yet they'reÂ* still often jammed solid in the rush hour. So what do you do, widen it to 8 lanes, 10? Where does it stop? When they plan it better and segregate the long distance and local traffic. The problem with that bit of the M25 (and I lived *there* 25yrs ago and saw it first hand) was mixing them up. And how do you plan to segregate them? Either you allow local trafficÂ* onto the M25 or you close the junctions. Â*You build a local road in parallel. Where? There are already local rads in parallel and they are swamped too. There are legacy local roads well away from the M25 corridor itself. None that I'm aware of newly built as M25 local relief roads. The newest bit of A14 (remember, the road we are discussing) segregates them, just as the A1(M) north of Huntingdon does, the road which hasn't shown any sign of jamming up 20yrs later. I doubt many people use the A1 for long distance travel in the south or midlands as there are too many roundabouts, Â*Almost none left now. too much slowing down and speeding up and too many selfish truckers doing the tortoise race holding up a quarter mile of traffic as they pass each other at 0.5mph difference in order to gain 1 minute that they immediately lose at the next roundabout anyway. Â*There typically isn't a "next roundabout", but I agree that HGV-racesÂ* are a pain, and hence why some roads (like the new A14, and the 20yr oldÂ* A1(M) in north Cambs) are built with more than 2 lanes. They tried banning HGVs from the outside lane on a hilly section of the A34 around Didcot. That's only 2-lane, I think. Or are you saying HGVs are racing also in a third lane? No 2 lane, it was an attempt to solve the problem on the cheap. It was routinely ignored and TVP didn't have the resources or inclination to police it properly. If they can catch and ANPR people speeding in any lane, they can issue tickets to HGVs in the 'wrong' lane. First install your ANPR cameras. It is not an area where too much speeding can take place because of the hills. -- Graeme Wall This account not read. |
Latest Heathrow master plan
|
Latest Heathrow master plan
On 15/12/2019 11:42, Graeme Wall wrote:
On 15/12/2019 10:44, Robin wrote: On 15/12/2019 10:25, Graeme Wall wrote: On 15/12/2019 09:19, Robin wrote: On 14/12/2019 21:55, Graeme Wall wrote: Actually the replacement rate is about 2.4 children per couple to allow for infertility, , infant mortality, gay couples and those who just don't want children. Currently the average is nearer 1.8 so in the long term the population of this country is going to shrink fairly rapidly. The downside is the population is getting older. It's a phenomenon that is being repeated across the world as people get better educated and the religious ties are loosened. I don't know what you mean by "long term" but the ONS project the population of the UK continuing to increase through to 2043. After the middle of the century as the offspring of the baby boomers start to die out and the influence of effective contraception took hold from the mid 1960s onward. Thanks for calibrating "long term". While you may of course be right I'll merely note that the statisticians at Eurostat do not agree.Â* They project the UK population continuing to increase (albeit more slowly) through to 2100. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/po...ta/main-tables A quick look at the fertility table shows the rate in the UK varying from a low of 1.27 in inner London to a high of 1.97 in outer London for 2017. The general trend is consistently falling across the country over the 5 year period on the chart. I'm unclear if you are saying Eurostat have made mistakes in their projections of population growth continuing through to 2100. All I know is that fertility is not the only factor. -- Robin reply-to address is (intended to be) valid |
Latest Heathrow master plan
In article , Basil Jet
writes On 15/12/2019 09:59, wrote: I doubt many people use the A1 for long distance travel in the south or midlands as there are too many roundabouts, I think the A1/A1M has two or three roundabouts between the London boundary and Northumberland. Off the top of my head the only one I can think of is the Black Cat. Google Maps says that, after the A411 in Borehamwood, there are two at Biggleswade, one at Sandy, the Black Cat, then the A1167 at Scremerston. -- Clive D.W. Feather |
Latest Heathrow master plan
On 15/12/2019 13:34, Robin wrote:
On 15/12/2019 11:42, Graeme Wall wrote: On 15/12/2019 10:44, Robin wrote: On 15/12/2019 10:25, Graeme Wall wrote: On 15/12/2019 09:19, Robin wrote: On 14/12/2019 21:55, Graeme Wall wrote: Actually the replacement rate is about 2.4 children per couple to allow for infertility, , infant mortality, gay couples and those who just don't want children. Currently the average is nearer 1.8 so in the long term the population of this country is going to shrink fairly rapidly. The downside is the population is getting older. It's a phenomenon that is being repeated across the world as people get better educated and the religious ties are loosened. I don't know what you mean by "long term" but the ONS project the population of the UK continuing to increase through to 2043. After the middle of the century as the offspring of the baby boomers start to die out and the influence of effective contraception took hold from the mid 1960s onward. Thanks for calibrating "long term". While you may of course be right I'll merely note that the statisticians at Eurostat do not agree.Â* They project the UK population continuing to increase (albeit more slowly) through to 2100. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/po...ta/main-tables A quick look at the fertility table shows the rate in the UK varying from a low of 1.27 in inner London to a high of 1.97 in outer London for 2017. The general trend is consistently falling across the country over the 5 year period on the chart. I'm unclear if you are saying Eurostat have made mistakes in their projections of population growth continuing through to 2100. All I know is that fertility is not the only factor. Just saying those figures are of the same order as the ones I derived from the New Scientist report on population changes a few months back. They will, inevitably, lead to a decline in the population in the long term. Defining that long term is a bit woolly but I would think the Eurostat projections are a mite pessimistic. -- Graeme Wall This account not read. |
Latest Heathrow master plan
On Sun, 15 Dec 2019 12:50:52 +0000
Basil Jet wrote: On 15/12/2019 09:59, wrote: I doubt many people use the A1 for long distance travel in the south or midlands as there are too many roundabouts, I think the A1/A1M has two or three roundabouts between the London boundary and Northumberland. And the rest: Apex Corner Stirling Corner Biggleswade x 2 Sandy Black Cat Buckden All in the same 50 mile stretch and all with queues during a weekday and thats before you take into account some tight curves and average speed camera enforced speed restrictions in the non motorway bedfordshire section. I made the mistake of driving to Edinburgh up the A1 about 5 years ago. Its not one I shall be repeating anytime soon though given the endless roadworks on the M1 with barely a worker to be seen for 5 miles at a time its a PITA going north out of London for any significant distance atm. |
Latest Heathrow master plan
In article , writes
On Sun, 15 Dec 2019 12:50:52 +0000 Basil Jet wrote: On 15/12/2019 09:59, wrote: I doubt many people use the A1 for long distance travel in the south or midlands as there are too many roundabouts, I think the A1/A1M has two or three roundabouts between the London boundary and Northumberland. And the rest: Apex Corner Stirling Corner Aren't both those within London? And I listed the second one, though not under that name. Biggleswade x 2 Sandy Black Cat Agreed. I listed all those. Buckden Oops: I managed to miss that one. After Buckden, though, I think the next one is at Scremerston, on the edge of Berwick-on-Tweed. So 5 roundabouts between the London boundary and Northumberland. All south of St.Neots. I agree that that's not perfect, though it's a lot better than when I had to go to Tyne and Wear regularly, and at least the Black Cat is on the list for rebuilding properly. -- Clive D.W. Feather |
Latest Heathrow master plan
wrote in message ... On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 17:22:53 +0000 Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 16:58:48 on Sat, 14 Dec 2019, remarked: Sure, it all goes to plan for a few years. Then ever more people start to use the route and in a decade or so you're back where you started except now the jams have twice as many cars with twice the pollution. The best example of this in the UK is the M25. No matter how much they widen it it just jams up again in a few years. It has 6 lanes each way around Heathrow yet they're still often jammed solid in the rush hour. So what do you do, widen it to 8 lanes, 10? Where does it stop? When they plan it better and segregate the long distance and local traffic. The problem with that bit of the M25 (and I lived *there* 25yrs ago and saw it first hand) was mixing them up. And how do you plan to segregate them? Either you allow local traffic onto the M25 or you close the junctions. The newest bit of A14 (remember, the road we are discussing) segregates them, just as the A1(M) north of Huntingdon does, the road which hasn't shown any sign of jamming up 20yrs later. I doubt many people use the A1 for long distance travel in the south or midlands as there are too many roundabouts, too much slowing down and speeding up and too many selfish truckers doing the tortoise race holding up a quarter mile of traffic as they pass each other at 0.5mph difference in order to gain 1 minute that they immediately lose at the next roundabout anyway. A1 is now roundabout free from Buckden to Newcastle tim |
Latest Heathrow master plan
wrote in message ... On Sun, 15 Dec 2019 12:50:52 +0000 Basil Jet wrote: On 15/12/2019 09:59, wrote: I doubt many people use the A1 for long distance travel in the south or midlands as there are too many roundabouts, I think the A1/A1M has two or three roundabouts between the London boundary and Northumberland. And the rest: Apex Corner Stirling Corner Biggleswade x 2 Sandy Black Cat Buckden That's a rather strange definition of "The Midlands" tim |
Latest Heathrow master plan
In article , tim...
writes Apex Corner Stirling Corner Biggleswade x 2 Sandy Black Cat Buckden That's a rather strange definition of "The Midlands" Boltar clearly comes from sarf of the Thames. I have a vague memory that if you try to divide the UK by population into three equal parts with two east-west lines, one goes through St. Albans and the other through Peterborough. But I could be wrong and can't be bothered to seek out the data and reconstruct it. -- Clive D.W. Feather |
Latest Heathrow master plan
Clive D.W. Feather wrote:
In article , tim... writes Apex Corner Stirling Corner Biggleswade x 2 Sandy Black Cat Buckden That's a rather strange definition of "The Midlands" Boltar clearly comes from sarf of the Thames. Neil lives in northeast London. I have a vague memory that if you try to divide the UK by population into three equal parts with two east-west lines, one goes through St. Albans and the other through Peterborough. But I could be wrong and can't be bothered to seek out the data and reconstruct it. There's a general drift of the population in a southerly direction, so such lines have probably moved south, too. |
Latest Heathrow master plan
"Clive D.W. Feather" wrote in message ... In article , tim... writes Apex Corner Stirling Corner Biggleswade x 2 Sandy Black Cat Buckden That's a rather strange definition of "The Midlands" Boltar clearly comes from sarf of the Thames. I have a vague memory that if you try to divide the UK by population into three equal parts with two east-west lines, one goes through St. Albans and the other through Peterborough. But I could be wrong and can't be bothered to seek out the data and reconstruct it. Sorry, doesn't pass scrutiny If we just look at GB, the total population is around 61,500,000, so one third is 20,500,000 Population of Scotland + NW + NE + Yorks regions is 20,300,000, and that doesn't include the part of Wales and East Mids that are north of the southernmost point of the others. So a line somewhere around Chester demarcates the Northern part Adding in NI to consider UK as a whole moves the point further North SE + SW + London is 22,000,00 so a point somewhere between St Albans and Luton could be the southern part tim |
Latest Heathrow master plan
On Sun, 15 Dec 2019 14:22:29 +0000, Clive D.W. Feather wrote:
In article , Basil Jet writes On 15/12/2019 09:59, wrote: I doubt many people use the A1 for long distance travel in the south or midlands as there are too many roundabouts, I think the A1/A1M has two or three roundabouts between the London boundary and Northumberland. Off the top of my head the only one I can think of is the Black Cat. Google Maps says that, after the A411 in Borehamwood, The A411 roundabout (Stirling Corner) is in London, the Barnet boundary runs on the west side of the A1 as far as the A5135. |
Latest Heathrow master plan
On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:23:11 -0000 (UTC)
Recliner wrote: Clive D.W. Feather wrote: In article , tim... writes Apex Corner Stirling Corner Biggleswade x 2 Sandy Black Cat Buckden That's a rather strange definition of "The Midlands" Boltar clearly comes from sarf of the Thames. Neil lives in northeast London. Wrong. Have another go. |
Latest Heathrow master plan
On Sun, 15 Dec 2019 23:27:49 +0000
"Clive D.W. Feather" wrote: In article , tim... writes Apex Corner Stirling Corner Biggleswade x 2 Sandy Black Cat Buckden That's a rather strange definition of "The Midlands" Boltar clearly comes from sarf of the Thames. Its all norf o' wotfard init? ;) I guess it depends how you define bedfordshires location. I'd call it the south midlands and I'd say "the south" ends at the northern hertfordshire border. But thats just how I think of it, ymmv. |
Latest Heathrow master plan
wrote:
On Sun, 15 Dec 2019 23:27:49 +0000 "Clive D.W. Feather" wrote: In article , tim... writes Apex Corner Stirling Corner Biggleswade x 2 Sandy Black Cat Buckden That's a rather strange definition of "The Midlands" Boltar clearly comes from sarf of the Thames. Its all norf o' wotfard init? ;) I guess it depends how you define bedfordshires location. I'd call it the south midlands and I'd say "the south" ends at the northern hertfordshire border. But thats just how I think of it, ymmv. Ignoring some that shifted at the weekend the old ITV regions were a reasonable guide to where an area was supposed to be a situation that is completely mucked up now with places like Bicester being reported on on broadcasts alongside reports about Bournemouth. GH |
Latest Heathrow master plan
wrote:
On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:23:11 -0000 (UTC) Recliner wrote: Clive D.W. Feather wrote: In article , tim... writes Apex Corner Stirling Corner Biggleswade x 2 Sandy Black Cat Buckden That's a rather strange definition of "The Midlands" Boltar clearly comes from sarf of the Thames. Neil lives in northeast London. Wrong. Have another go. I suppose you prefer to call it North London? |
Latest Heathrow master plan
On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 16:08:34 -0000 (UTC)
Recliner wrote: wrote: On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:23:11 -0000 (UTC) Recliner wrote: Clive D.W. Feather wrote: In article , tim... writes Apex Corner Stirling Corner Biggleswade x 2 Sandy Black Cat Buckden That's a rather strange definition of "The Midlands" Boltar clearly comes from sarf of the Thames. Neil lives in northeast London. Wrong. Have another go. I suppose you prefer to call it North London? You're assuming I still live in London. But keep guessing, its amusing. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:56 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk