In article , MissRiaElaine
writes
Allowing individuals to decide for themselves means they are forcing
their decisions on other people.* I'm fed up with the lycras around here
who've decided social distancing is unnecessary.

But it's ok for you, the government and every other Tom, Dick or Harry
to force their decisions on us.

In the case of the government, that's what we elected them to do.

--
Clive D.W. Feather

On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 17:05:07 +0100, "Clive D.W. Feather"
wrote:

In article , MissRiaElaine
writes
Allowing individuals to decide for themselves means they are forcing
their decisions on other people.* I'm fed up with the lycras around here
who've decided social distancing is unnecessary.

But it's ok for you, the government and every other Tom, Dick or Harry
to force their decisions on us.

In the case of the government, that's what we elected them to do.

FSVO "We".

On 03/06/2020 17:05, Clive D.W. Feather wrote:
In article , MissRiaElaine
writes
Allowing individuals to decide for themselves means they are forcing
their decisions on other people.Â* I'm fed up with the lycras around here
who've decided social distancing is unnecessary.

But it's ok for you, the government and every other Tom, Dick or Harry
to force their decisions on us.

In the case of the government, that's what we elected them to do.

I voted because I consider it my civic duty to do so. I did not vote to
be talked down to like I am 10 years old and on the naughty step.

I will not be told do this do that do the other, I left school in the
70's and I am perfectly capable of weighing up the risks of doing
something or not.


--
Ria in Aberdeen

[Send address is invalid, use sipsoup at gmail dot com to reply direct]