Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Recliner" wrote in message
... Yes, I'm talking about the unloved class 458 fleet. I'd not travelled in them before, so I felt I should give them a try while they're still in service. I found that they're surprisingly comfortable — I wonder if Ian Walmsley managed to sneak comfortable seats in when the 458s and 460s were being refurbished to become the 458/5s? I commuted on the 460s for a while when they were new. The seating was their only redeeming feature. Otherwise the interior lighting was very harsh, the announcements and door chimes stupidly loud, and the air-conditioning extremely noisy. At least the journey only lasted 30 minutes if you were lucky. I think the 458s were essentially the same train with another stupid cab end - the original end doors had to be locked OOU when units ran in multiple - and nasty high-density seating. I also used the latest version of the 458s fairly frequently for a while and, as far as I could tell, the 460 seating was retained when the cars were incorporated into the fleet so maybe you were just lucky. -- DAS |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
D A Stocks wrote:
"Recliner" wrote in message ... Yes, I'm talking about the unloved class 458 fleet. I'd not travelled in them before, so I felt I should give them a try while they're still in service. I found that they're surprisingly comfortable — I wonder if Ian Walmsley managed to sneak comfortable seats in when the 458s and 460s were being refurbished to become the 458/5s? I commuted on the 460s for a while when they were new. The seating was their only redeeming feature. Otherwise the interior lighting was very harsh, the announcements and door chimes stupidly loud, and the air-conditioning extremely noisy. At least the journey only lasted 30 minutes if you were lucky. I think the 458s were essentially the same train with another stupid cab end - the original end doors had to be locked OOU when units ran in multiple - and nasty high-density seating. I also used the latest version of the 458s fairly frequently for a while and, as far as I could tell, the 460 seating was retained when the cars were incorporated into the fleet so maybe you were just lucky. Ah, I hadn't thought of that. Maybe I need to try them again, picking a carriage with different seating? Talking about GatEx trains, the current 387/2s have horrible, upright, hard seats, like most modern trains. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recliner wrote:
D A Stocks wrote: "Recliner" wrote in message ... Yes, I'm talking about the unloved class 458 fleet. I'd not travelled in them before, so I felt I should give them a try while they're still in service. I found that they're surprisingly comfortable — I wonder if Ian Walmsley managed to sneak comfortable seats in when the 458s and 460s were being refurbished to become the 458/5s? I commuted on the 460s for a while when they were new. The seating was their only redeeming feature. Otherwise the interior lighting was very harsh, the announcements and door chimes stupidly loud, and the air-conditioning extremely noisy. At least the journey only lasted 30 minutes if you were lucky. I think the 458s were essentially the same train with another stupid cab end - the original end doors had to be locked OOU when units ran in multiple - and nasty high-density seating. I also used the latest version of the 458s fairly frequently for a while and, as far as I could tell, the 460 seating was retained when the cars were incorporated into the fleet so maybe you were just lucky. Ah, I hadn't thought of that. Maybe I need to try them again, picking a carriage with different seating? Some sets are mostly 458 with one ex-460 vehicle; IIRC some are entirely ex-460? You can tell the difference by the glazing; separately framed windows on the 458s, ribbon glazing on the ex 460 vehicles. Anna Noyd-Dryver |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Recliner" wrote in message
... D A Stocks wrote: "Recliner" wrote in message ... I also used the latest version of the 458s fairly frequently for a while and, as far as I could tell, the 460 seating was retained when the cars were incorporated into the fleet so maybe you were just lucky. Ah, I hadn't thought of that. Maybe I need to try them again, picking a carriage with different seating? The ex. 460 cars also have different glazing, so they're fairly recognisable from the outside. It's possible some/all of the ex-460 cars may have been refitted since I was using them around 4-5 years ago. Talking about GatEx trains, the current 387/2s have horrible, upright, hard seats, like most modern trains. Yes, but the trains are otherwise fairly civilised: there is adequate legroom, power sockets and wifi unlike, e.g. the class 700s as built. I find these seats - with the legroom - are acceptable for a one hour journey, which is about as long as it gets on the Brighton Line. -- DAS |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
O/T - Design for new US Embassy in Nine Elms revealed | London Transport | |||
FGW Link excels even Thames Strains at public safety (lack of ...) | London Transport | |||
FIRST GREAT WESTERN LINK WORSE THAN THAMES STRAINS | London Transport | |||
Thames Ships HMS Chrysanthemum & Discovery | London Transport | |||
First Group wins Thames Franchise | London Transport |