Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/04/2021 06:24, Recliner wrote:
Basil Jet wrote: On 07/04/2021 22:13, Sam Wilson wrote: Basil Jet wrote: My fantasy for a long time is for the Overground lines to be named after animals with distinctive coats, and for nearly all of the LU stock to be liveried like the animals (apart from a few line-hopping spares in the current livery). ... So, the East London Line becomes "The Tiger" (no "line"), and the trains, bridges and map line have tiger appearance - the Chingford line becomes "The Giraffe", the Romford-Upminster becomes "The Ladybird" etc. https://www.lothianbuses.com/news/2017/10/edinburgh-goes-wild-for-new-zoo-design-buses/ I know children who say things like “look, it’s the lemur bus!” Sam I wasn't suggesting the trains have pictures of animal faces or body shapes, but that the entire train be covered in zebra stripes etc. Obviously not an option with LO, as the fleet is mostly shared between routes. ' Shared over a week, but are there any shared diagrams? Is there any downside to having mostly dedicated fleets with a few spares in corporate livery? Anglia have liveried trains for the Bittern line, East Suffolk line etc, but I've only ever seen them on the wrong lines! -- Basil Jet recently enjoyed listening to 2004 - 18 Monkeys On A Dead Man's Chest - David Thomas & Two Pale Boys |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Basil Jet wrote:
On 08/04/2021 06:24, Recliner wrote: Basil Jet wrote: On 07/04/2021 22:13, Sam Wilson wrote: Basil Jet wrote: My fantasy for a long time is for the Overground lines to be named after animals with distinctive coats, and for nearly all of the LU stock to be liveried like the animals (apart from a few line-hopping spares in the current livery). ... So, the East London Line becomes "The Tiger" (no "line"), and the trains, bridges and map line have tiger appearance - the Chingford line becomes "The Giraffe", the Romford-Upminster becomes "The Ladybird" etc. https://www.lothianbuses.com/news/2017/10/edinburgh-goes-wild-for-new-zoo-design-buses/ I know children who say things like “look, it’s the lemur bus!” Sam I wasn't suggesting the trains have pictures of animal faces or body shapes, but that the entire train be covered in zebra stripes etc. Obviously not an option with LO, as the fleet is mostly shared between routes. ' Shared over a week, but are there any shared diagrams? Is there any downside to having mostly dedicated fleets with a few spares in corporate livery? I haven’t noticed it so much recently, but Edinburgh used to have quite a lot of dedicated buses with the route number included in the livery as well as on the indicator blinds. Anglia have liveried trains for the Bittern line, East Suffolk line etc, but I've only ever seen them on the wrong lines! You could argue that the smaller open access operators do exactly that! Sam -- The entity formerly known as Spit the dummy to reply |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/04/2021 13:16, Sam Wilson wrote:
Basil Jet wrote: On 08/04/2021 06:24, Recliner wrote: Obviously not an option with LO, as the fleet is mostly shared between routes. ' Shared over a week, but are there any shared diagrams? Is there any downside to having mostly dedicated fleets with a few spares in corporate livery? I haven’t noticed it so much recently, but Edinburgh used to have quite a lot of dedicated buses with the route number included in the livery as well as on the indicator blinds. London too... Route 13 springs to mind http://www.showbus.co.uk/photos/jjd417d.JPG But at the end of the day, it comes down to how the LO diagrams are operated. Does each service have dedicated diagrams? Do Chingford and Enfield services share diagrams, for instance? -- Basil Jet recently enjoyed listening to 2004 - 18 Monkeys On A Dead Man's Chest - David Thomas & Two Pale Boys |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 13:56:46 +0100
Basil Jet wrote: On 08/04/2021 13:16, Sam Wilson wrote: Basil Jet wrote: On 08/04/2021 06:24, Recliner wrote: Obviously not an option with LO, as the fleet is mostly shared between routes. ' Shared over a week, but are there any shared diagrams? Is there any downside to having mostly dedicated fleets with a few spares in corporate livery? I haven’t noticed it so much recently, but Edinburgh used to have quite a lot of dedicated buses with the route number included in the livery as well as on the indicator blinds. London too... Route 13 springs to mind http://www.showbus.co.uk/photos/jjd417d.JPG That was a special service though. IIRC 13 was the only route left with Routemasters on it. If however you're a bus company with multiple routes and a general fleet of buses, painting specific route numbers on the sides doesn't sound like the smartest idea for obvious reasons. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/04/2021 18:07, Graeme Wall wrote:
On 08/04/2021 15:53, wrote: On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 13:56:46 +0100 Basil Jet wrote: On 08/04/2021 13:16, Sam Wilson wrote: Basil Jet wrote: On 08/04/2021 06:24, Recliner wrote: Obviously not an option with LO, as the fleet is mostly shared between routes. ' Shared over a week, but are there any shared diagrams? Is there any downside to having mostly dedicated fleets with a few spares in corporate livery? I haven’t noticed it so much recently, but Edinburgh used to have quite a lot of dedicated buses with the route number included in the livery as well as on the indicator blinds. London too... Route 13 springs to mind http://www.showbus.co.uk/photos/jjd417d.JPG That was a special service though. IIRC 13 was the only route left with Routemasters on it. If however you're a bus company with multiple routes and a general fleet of buses, painting specific route numbers on the sides doesn't sound like the smartest idea for obvious reasons. Quite a lot do it though. Here's a Brighton one... -- Basil Jet recently enjoyed listening to 2015 - Daylight Versions - The Leaf Library |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Basil Jet" wrote in message
... I haven’t noticed it so much recently, but Edinburgh used to have quite a lot of dedicated buses with the route number included in the livery as well as on the indicator blinds. London too... Route 13 springs to mind http://www.showbus.co.uk/photos/jjd417d.JPG That was a special service though. IIRC 13 was the only route left with Routemasters on it. If however you're a bus company with multiple routes and a general fleet of buses, painting specific route numbers on the sides doesn't sound like the smartest idea for obvious reasons. Quite a lot do it though. Here's a Brighton one... That's fair enough. The buses that do long-distance routes (the Leeds-York-Malton-Scarborough/Whitby "Coastliner" is the one near me) tend to be higher spec and more powerful for going further and faster, and getting up hills (Whitwell Hill is the killer for buses on the A64), so they have a dedicated fleet with specific livery. But the livery doesn't go down to the level of separate paint jobs depending on whether the bus goes to Whitby or Scarborough after Malton :-) The Number 36 Ripon-Harrogate-Leeds buses are a specific livery with those destinations painted on the side - but that's a fast and frequent service with little extras like USB charging points and wifi (introduced long before it became common even on local buses). (By rights, that bus should be the reinstated Ripon railway service, but the 36 bus is so good that trains could probably not compete on price, and *maybe* not on journey time, so the line will probably never be re-opened now.) |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Basil Jet wrote:
On 08/04/2021 18:07, Graeme Wall wrote: On 08/04/2021 15:53, wrote: On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 13:56:46 +0100 Basil Jet wrote: On 08/04/2021 13:16, Sam Wilson wrote: Basil Jet wrote: On 08/04/2021 06:24, Recliner wrote: Obviously not an option with LO, as the fleet is mostly shared between routes. ' Shared over a week, but are there any shared diagrams? Is there any downside to having mostly dedicated fleets with a few spares in corporate livery? I haven’t noticed it so much recently, but Edinburgh used to have quite a lot of dedicated buses with the route number included in the livery as well as on the indicator blinds. London too... Route 13 springs to mind http://www.showbus.co.uk/photos/jjd417d.JPG That was a special service though. IIRC 13 was the only route left with Routemasters on it. If however you're a bus company with multiple routes and a general fleet of buses, painting specific route numbers on the sides doesn't sound like the smartest idea for obvious reasons. Quite a lot do it though. Here's a Brighton one... And some Edinburgh ones: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lothian_Buses_bus_720_Volvo_B7TL_Wrightbus_Ec lipse_Gemini_SN55_BLV_Madder_and_White_livery_Rout e_3_Connect_branding.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lothian_Buses_bus_715_Volvo_B7TL_Wrightbus_Ec lipse_Gemini_SN55_BKY_Harlequin_livery_Route_3_Clu b_Class_branding.jpg http://www.edinphoto.org.uk/0_edin_t/0_edinburgh_transport_buses_2005_bus_670_003100_10 00.htm https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-a-number-26-lothian-bus-on-princes-street-with-a-frog-advertising-104234367.html https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lothian_Buses_bus_745_Volvo_B7TL_Wrightbus_Ec lipse_Gemini_SN55_BOU_Harlequin_livery_Route_44_Se rvice_with_a_Sparkle_route_branding.jpg Sam -- The entity formerly known as Spit the dummy to reply |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 18:07:28 +0100
Graeme Wall wrote: On 08/04/2021 15:53, wrote: On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 13:56:46 +0100 Basil Jet wrote: On 08/04/2021 13:16, Sam Wilson wrote: Basil Jet wrote: On 08/04/2021 06:24, Recliner wrote: Obviously not an option with LO, as the fleet is mostly shared between routes. ' Shared over a week, but are there any shared diagrams? Is there any downside to having mostly dedicated fleets with a few spares in corporate livery? I haven’t noticed it so much recently, but Edinburgh used to have quite a lot of dedicated buses with the route number included in the livery as well as on the indicator blinds. London too... Route 13 springs to mind http://www.showbus.co.uk/photos/jjd417d.JPG That was a special service though. IIRC 13 was the only route left with Routemasters on it. If however you're a bus company with multiple routes and a general fleet of buses, painting specific route numbers on the sides doesn't sound like the smartest idea for obvious reasons. Quite a lot do it though. Yes, I find it a bit odd tbh as it must limit vehicle flexibility considerably. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 18:07:28 +0100 Graeme Wall wrote: On 08/04/2021 15:53, wrote: On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 13:56:46 +0100 Basil Jet wrote: On 08/04/2021 13:16, Sam Wilson wrote: Basil Jet wrote: On 08/04/2021 06:24, Recliner wrote: Obviously not an option with LO, as the fleet is mostly shared between routes. ' Shared over a week, but are there any shared diagrams? Is there any downside to having mostly dedicated fleets with a few spares in corporate livery? I haven’t noticed it so much recently, but Edinburgh used to have quite a lot of dedicated buses with the route number included in the livery as well as on the indicator blinds. London too... Route 13 springs to mind http://www.showbus.co.uk/photos/jjd417d.JPG That was a special service though. IIRC 13 was the only route left with Routemasters on it. If however you're a bus company with multiple routes and a general fleet of buses, painting specific route numbers on the sides doesn't sound like the smartest idea for obvious reasons. Quite a lot do it though. Yes, I find it a bit odd tbh as it must limit vehicle flexibility considerably. It needs a handful of extra unbranded spare vehicles across a fleet, which was obviously considered and costed when the first few companies began to introduce it. It's obviously seen as a worthwhile expenditure for the increased visual recognition of the buses and routes, not just among passengers but among potential passengers, including those who don't realise they're potential passengers yet. In any case, it's not uncommon for different routes to have different fleets in any case, even if they're not branded differently - eg in my area the 'prime' pair of routes (direct to the city centre) have always had newer vehicles than the routes which meander through less salubrious parts of town on their way to the centre. Not to mention different vehicle sizes - in the '90s Crosville Wales around where I lived, had some routes operated by the small minibuses, some by bigger minibuses, some by small full-size buses, some by bigger full-size buses and finally the double decker routes. Anna Noyd-Dryver |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Stations named after commercial entities | London Transport | |||
Stations named after commercial entities | London Transport | |||
Harrow and Wealdstone named London rail station of the year | London Transport | |||
Kings Cross fire (1987) : final victim named | London Transport | |||
1987 King's Cross fire victim named | London Transport |