Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 22:37:33 GMT, Velvet
wrote in message : On the other hand, they drive less carefully when protected by airbags, abs and seatbelts. Not all of them do, ta :-) I don't think anyone is immune to risk compensation, although some people have a more realistic view of the merits of various safety aids than others. The comment refers to research done on drivers with and without ABS and seatbelts, which showed that they drove faster and less safely when using those devices. See Risk by John Adams. I don't rely on ABS to stop me quicker - I use it to even out the fact that the car in front probably has it and will stop quicker than I can if I don't have it... Er, actually ABS doesn't really affect stopping distances. It allows you to steer while braking. So it's not quite as clear cut that all the extra safety stuff makes people drive less carefully :-) It is, though. The taxi driver ABS trial was a near-perfect double-blind study and it showed that those driving ABS equipped cars accelerated harder, braked harder, drove faster and followed closer. Guy -- May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting. http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk 88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at Washington University |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
have the time to do everything you want | London Transport | |||
traffic is better, but livingstone is thinking of more traffic zone? | London Transport | |||
Everything we know about traffic-calming is wrong | London Transport | |||
Traffic Calming in Islington | London Transport | |||
top up wrong Oyster (almost) | London Transport |