Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 24/6/04 9:26 am, in article
, "Velvet" wrote: I can't see that removing what little markings there are (four side turnings) would slow people on the section that doesn't have any. Humps *might just* slow the buggers down though, to something approaching reasonable speeds for the road. Howabout redoing the priorities at the site turnings so that anyone going straight on has to give way? Bad ascii art follows: ---------------------------------------------------- ------------------------=========------------------- | | | | | | | | goes to ---------------------------------------------------- || || ------------------------ ------------------- | | | | | | | | Where double lines indicates a give way or stop. Could even do a three way stop? No road humps, but natural traffic calming by setting the priorities. ...d |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
have the time to do everything you want | London Transport | |||
traffic is better, but livingstone is thinking of more traffic zone? | London Transport | |||
Everything we know about traffic-calming is wrong | London Transport | |||
Traffic Calming in Islington | London Transport | |||
top up wrong Oyster (almost) | London Transport |