Steve Peake wrote:

On 21 Jul 2004 04:58:17 -0700, Martin Whelton wrote:

The spur to Kingston is likely to be dropped(and I was told this from
a very senior source at Tfl) due to cost considerations and will save
a substantial amount of money. Besides the Kingston link will go
through an area notorious for middle class articulate whingers who
have already started on certain aspects of the scheme and will no
cause untold misery if anything get's in their way.

That bunch could (and should) be destroyed. The vast majority of people in
SW london want crossrail, that bunch of winger's shouldn't be allowed to
get in the way.

Heathrow should be dropped, putting in another link just because the
Heathrow express is too expensive make no sense at all.

No, Heathrow should stay on there - after all, it's a very popular
destination. However, Crossrail trains serving it should stop at all
stations - then the Heathrow Express can continue to operate and the
residents of West London get a much better service.

"Aidan Stanger" wrote in message
...

Heathrow should be dropped, putting in another link just because the
Heathrow express is too expensive make no sense at all.

No, Heathrow should stay on there - after all, it's a very popular
destination. However, Crossrail trains serving it should stop at all
stations - then the Heathrow Express can continue to operate and the
residents of West London get a much better service.

I seem to remember from somewhere that Crossrail is being slated to take
over the soon-to-be-starting 4tph (?) FGW Link Heathrow service. This being
the one that stops at Ealing, Hayes, etc. and uses spare Desiros from
Angel's speculative build. I think there
was an article about it in last month's Modern Railways.

Angus

Angus Bryant wrote:
"Aidan Stanger" wrote in message
...

Heathrow should be dropped, putting in another link just because the
Heathrow express is too expensive make no sense at all.


No, Heathrow should stay on there - after all, it's a very popular
destination. However, Crossrail trains serving it should stop at all
stations - then the Heathrow Express can continue to operate and the
residents of West London get a much better service.


I seem to remember from somewhere that Crossrail is being slated to take
over the soon-to-be-starting 4tph (?) FGW Link Heathrow service. This being
the one that stops at Ealing, Hayes, etc. and uses spare Desiros from
Angel's speculative build. I think there
was an article about it in last month's Modern Railways.

Angus

The service is known as Heathrow Connect and will be 2tph; I've got some
info at http://www.alwaystouchout.com/project/67


--
Dave Arquati
Imperial College, SW7
www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London

"Dave Arquati" wrote in message
...
Angus Bryant wrote:
"Aidan Stanger" wrote in message
...

Heathrow should be dropped, putting in another link just because the
Heathrow express is too expensive make no sense at all.


No, Heathrow should stay on there - after all, it's a very popular
destination. However, Crossrail trains serving it should stop at all
stations - then the Heathrow Express can continue to operate and the
residents of West London get a much better service.


I seem to remember from somewhere that Crossrail is being slated to take
over the soon-to-be-starting 4tph (?) FGW Link Heathrow service. This
being
the one that stops at Ealing, Hayes, etc. and uses spare Desiros from
Angel's speculative build. I think there
was an article about it in last month's Modern Railways.

Angus

The service is known as Heathrow Connect and will be 2tph; I've got some
info at http://www.alwaystouchout.com/project/67

If the Heathrow Connect is going to replace the Slough all-stations services
then what is going to happen to West Drayton, Langley and Iver?

Peter Smyth

In article ,
Peter Smyth wrote:

"Dave Arquati" wrote in message
...
Angus Bryant wrote:
"Aidan Stanger" wrote in message
...

Heathrow should be dropped, putting in another link just because the
Heathrow express is too expensive make no sense at all.


No, Heathrow should stay on there - after all, it's a very popular
destination. However, Crossrail trains serving it should stop at all
stations - then the Heathrow Express can continue to operate and the
residents of West London get a much better service.


I seem to remember from somewhere that Crossrail is being slated to
take over the soon-to-be-starting 4tph (?) FGW Link Heathrow
service. This being the one that stops at Ealing, Hayes, etc. and
uses spare Desiros from Angel's speculative build. I think there
was an article about it in last month's Modern Railways.

Angus

The service is known as Heathrow Connect and will be 2tph; I've got
some info at http://www.alwaystouchout.com/project/67

If the Heathrow Connect is going to replace the Slough all-stations
services then what is going to happen to West Drayton, Langley and Iver?

There is to be a new Paddington-Reading stopping service running every 15
minutes which will probably serve these stations. Two trains per hour will
continue to Oxford.

David

"Dave Arquati" wrote in message
...

No, Heathrow should stay on there - after all, it's a very popular
destination. However, Crossrail trains serving it should stop at all
stations - then the Heathrow Express can continue to operate and the
residents of West London get a much better service.


I seem to remember from somewhere that Crossrail is being slated to take
over the soon-to-be-starting 4tph (?) FGW Link Heathrow service. This
being
the one that stops at Ealing, Hayes, etc. and uses spare Desiros from
Angel's speculative build. I think there
was an article about it in last month's Modern Railways.

The service is known as Heathrow Connect and will be 2tph; I've got some
info at http://www.alwaystouchout.com/project/67

Sorry, should have looked at your site first! Thanks.

Angus