![]() |
|
High Street Kensington Station
From: Benjamin Lukoff )
Subject: High Street Kensington Station Date: 2000/01/29 If the actual name of the street is KENSINGTON HIGH STREET, why is the station called HIGH STREET KENSINGTON? Only 54 months late, but I think I've figured it out. The London County Council decided at some point (1930s I think) that it was going to ensure there were no duplicate road names in its area, and took to renaming vast tracts of the county of London. I suspect that prior to this date, Kensington High St, Clapham High St, Stepney High St etc, and the biggest mouthful of them all St Johns Wood High St, had all been called "High St". Obviously "High St" would have been a crap name for a station. The station could just as well have been called ""Kensington High St" but they happened to pick "High St Kensington" instead. When the streets were renamed, all of the High Streets in London had the district name prefixed, creating the present anomaly. I suppose this was also when the mouthful "Stoke Newington Church Street" was created. Other possibly related station name anomalies: Bond St (did New Bond St used to be called Bond St before the 1930s?) Marlborough Rd station (now closed, but by a road called "Marlborough Place", presumably renamed in the 1930s) I believe Queenstown Road Battersea station was called Queens Road Battersea for many years after the road had changed its name from Queens Rd to Queenstown Road. York Rd Station - also closed, but on a road called York Way after being renamed in the same project. BTW, I was going to ask if St Johns Wood High St was the the only quintuple-barrel road name in Britain, but the first page on which I opened the A-Z contained "Royal Albert Dock Spine Road"! -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
High Street Kensington Station
John Rowland wrote:
From: Benjamin Lukoff ) Subject: High Street Kensington Station Date: 2000/01/29 If the actual name of the street is KENSINGTON HIGH STREET, why is the station called HIGH STREET KENSINGTON? Only 54 months late, but I think I've figured it out. The London County Council decided at some point (1930s I think) that it was going to ensure there were no duplicate road names in its area, and took to renaming vast tracts of the county of London. I suspect that prior to this date, Kensington High St, Clapham High St, Stepney High St etc, and the biggest mouthful of them all St Johns Wood High St, had all been called "High St". Obviously "High St" would have been a crap name for a station. The station could just as well have been called ""Kensington High St" but they happened to pick "High St Kensington" instead. When the streets were renamed, all of the High Streets in London had the district name prefixed, creating the present anomaly. I suppose this was also when the mouthful "Stoke Newington Church Street" was created. Interesting, I've wondered that too... the problem is that many people - especially visitors or newcomers - use Tube stations as landmarks, so just as when someone refers to "Tottenham Court Road" they invariably mean St Giles Circus, most students at Imperial refer to Kensington High St as High St Ken. It seems to roll off the tongue a bit better too. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
High Street Kensington Station
In article ,
"John Rowland" wrote: From: Benjamin Lukoff ) If the actual name of the street is KENSINGTON HIGH STREET, why is the station called HIGH STREET KENSINGTON? Only 54 months late, but I think I've figured it out. The London County Council decided at some point (1930s I think) that it was going to ensure there were no duplicate road names in its area, and took to renaming vast tracts of the county of London. It started earlier than that. The Metropolitan Board of Works (1855-1889) had begun the work of renaming streets to remove duplicates and stop people getting post intended for the occupant of the same property on a different street of the same name. It changed 3,000 names in its time. The LCC had to be prodded by the Post Office to continue it, and by 1935 it had changed 2,700 names. At this point it began to see light at the end of the tunnel and took a policy decision that there were to be no duplicated names at all. In many libraries in London you will find the LCC publication giving the names of streets in London. They also sometimes changed the numbering, adopting a uniform scheme that the smallest number would be the closest part of the street to St. Paul's Cathedral. Incidentally are there only two streets in London which have fractional numbers in them? (Balls Pond Road and London Wall) -- http://www.election.demon.co.uk "The guilty party was the Liberal Democrats and they were hardened offenders, and coded racism was again in evidence in leaflets distributed in September 1993." - Nigel Copsey, "Contemporary British Fascism", page 62. |
High Street Kensington Station
John Rowland wrote:
From: Benjamin Lukoff ) Subject: High Street Kensington Station Date: 2000/01/29 If the actual name of the street is KENSINGTON HIGH STREET, why is the station called HIGH STREET KENSINGTON? Only 54 months late, but I think I've figured it out. The London County Council decided at some point (1930s I think) that it was going to ensure there were no duplicate road names in its area, and took to renaming vast tracts of the county of London. I suspect that prior to this date, Kensington High St, Clapham High St, Stepney High St etc, and the biggest mouthful of them all St Johns Wood High St, had all been called "High St". Obviously "High St" would have been a crap name for a station. The station could just as well have been called ""Kensington High St" but they happened to pick "High St Kensington" instead. According to Douglas Rose, the station was opened as "Kensington (High Street)" in 1868, but was gradually renamed as "High Street Kensington" by 1880, perhaps to avoid confusion with Kensington (Addison Road), the present Kensington Olympia. Before D stock was introduced on the District, the destination boards on the front of the old CO/CP stock said just "High Street". -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
High Street Kensington Station
In message , at
00:29:15 on Sun, 15 Aug 2004, David Boothroyd remarked: They also sometimes changed the numbering, adopting a uniform scheme that the smallest number would be the closest part of the street to St. Paul's Cathedral. Not perhaps to St Pauls Cathedral, but to the central Post Office just north of the Cathedral, after which the tube station now known as St Pauls was originally named. -- Roland Perry |
High Street Kensington Station
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 00:29:15 on Sun, 15 Aug 2004, David Boothroyd remarked: They also sometimes changed the numbering, adopting a uniform scheme that the smallest number would be the closest part of the street to St. Paul's Cathedral. Not perhaps to St Pauls Cathedral, but to the central Post Office just north of the Cathedral, after which the tube station now known as St Pauls was originally named. According to http://www.gendocs.demon.co.uk/lon-str.html , the aim was of the 1888 renumbering was to arrange for the lowest number to be closest to the *local* post office. -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
High Street Kensington Station
"David Boothroyd" wrote in message
... The Metropolitan Board of Works (1855-1889) had begun the work of renaming streets to remove duplicates and stop people getting post intended for the occupant of the same property on a different street of the same name. It changed 3,000 names in its time. The LCC had to be prodded by the Post Office to continue it, and by 1935 it had changed 2,700 names. At this point it began to see light at the end of the tunnel and took a policy decision that there were to be no duplicated names at all. Thanks. I've seen a lot of street signs in North London that say something like "Smith St N" instead of "Smith St N1". Do these signs date from an interim period where names were unique to each sector but not to the whole county? If not, what was the point of them? Incidentally are there only two streets in London which have fractional numbers in them? (Balls Pond Road and London Wall) I think there's one in Barnard Hill, N10. Also, The Vale in Childs Hill has a number 0. Incidentally, in HA5 there are two Pinner Roads, one at each end of the area. Are there any other duplicated roads within a single postcode area (not including cases where a single road has become split)? -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
High Street Kensington Station
"Dave Arquati" a écrit dans le message de ... John Rowland wrote: From: Benjamin Lukoff ) Subject: High Street Kensington Station Date: 2000/01/29 If the actual name of the street is KENSINGTON HIGH STREET, why is the station called HIGH STREET KENSINGTON? Only 54 months late, but I think I've figured it out. The London County Council decided at some point (1930s I think) that it was going to ensure there were no duplicate road names in its area, and took to renaming vast tracts of the county of London. I suspect that prior to this date, Kensington High St, Clapham High St, Stepney High St etc, and the biggest mouthful of them all St Johns Wood High St, had all been called "High St". Obviously "High St" would have been a crap name for a station. The station could just as well have been called ""Kensington High St" but they happened to pick "High St Kensington" instead. When the streets were renamed, all of the High Streets in London had the district name prefixed, creating the present anomaly. I suppose this was also when the mouthful "Stoke Newington Church Street" was created. Interesting, I've wondered that too... the problem is that many people - especially visitors or newcomers - use Tube stations as landmarks, so just as when someone refers to "Tottenham Court Road" they invariably mean St Giles Circus, most students at Imperial refer to Kensington High St as High St Ken. It seems to roll off the tongue a bit better too. Is it only me who thinks 'High St. Ken' sounds more like the name of a church ;-) IMHO the basic problem is that general English usage requires any additional word(s) specifying which of various options applies to precede the generic name (IOW: we say eg 'East Acton' rather than 'Acton East') but the convention in making lists is to adopt a simple alphabetic order. So such lists fail to group closely related names together, and anybody consulting one has no simple way of finding out if a particular name is part of such a group or not. One solution would be to adopt the 'army' practice of putting the generic name first : eg 'brush, hair' followed by 'brush, paint' ; so that a list of station names would have eg Acton followed by Central, East, North, South, Town and West, regardless of the presentation on station nameboards. Or would that only compound the confusion? Regards, - Alan (in Brussels - mind the spamtrap) |
High Street Kensington Station
John Rowland wrote:
"David Boothroyd" wrote in message ... The Metropolitan Board of Works (1855-1889) had begun the work of renaming streets to remove duplicates and stop people getting post intended for the occupant of the same property on a different street of the same name. It changed 3,000 names in its time. The LCC had to be prodded by the Post Office to continue it, and by 1935 it had changed 2,700 names. At this point it began to see light at the end of the tunnel and took a policy decision that there were to be no duplicated names at all. Thanks. I've seen a lot of street signs in North London that say something like "Smith St N" instead of "Smith St N1". Do these signs date from an interim period where names were unique to each sector but not to the whole county? If not, what was the point of them? I believe there was a time when the postal districts were simply North, West, East etc. It was later that they were sub divided into smaller areas with a number added to the original, hence W1, SW19 etc. Then of course came the current postcodes. Found this:- http://www.wikisearch.net/en/wikiped..._district.html Incidentally are there only two streets in London which have fractional numbers in them? (Balls Pond Road and London Wall) I think there's one in Barnard Hill, N10. Also, The Vale in Childs Hill has a number 0. Incidentally, in HA5 there are two Pinner Roads, one at each end of the area. Are there any other duplicated roads within a single postcode area (not including cases where a single road has become split)? |
High Street Kensington Station
|
High Street Kensington Station
"John Rowland" typed
"David Boothroyd" wrote in message ... The Metropolitan Board of Works (1855-1889) had begun the work of renaming streets to remove duplicates and stop people getting post intended for the occupant of the same property on a different street of the same name. It changed 3,000 names in its time. The LCC had to be prodded by the Post Office to continue it, and by 1935 it had changed 2,700 names. At this point it began to see light at the end of the tunnel and took a policy decision that there were to be no duplicated names at all. Thanks. I've seen a lot of street signs in North London that say something like "Smith St N" instead of "Smith St N1". Do these signs date from an interim period where names were unique to each sector but not to the whole county? If not, what was the point of them? Incidentally are there only two streets in London which have fractional numbers in them? (Balls Pond Road and London Wall) I think there's one in Barnard Hill, N10. Also, The Vale in Childs Hill has a number 0. pedant I'd say that end of The Vale was in Golders Green. House has 'zero' in large letters outside it. Incidentally, in HA5 there are two Pinner Roads, one at each end of the area. Are there any other duplicated roads within a single postcode area (not including cases where a single road has become split)? Locally to me, but NOT in the same postcode area, are Bacon Lane, Edgware and Bacon Lane Kingsbury. They are less than two miles apart. They would have been in Middlesex until quite recently. Edgware and Edgware Road cause much local confusion too. Was on 142 bus at Edgware on Friday whe poor Arab lass wanted Judd Street, whic isn't even close to Marble Arch. -- Helen D. Vecht: Edgware. |
High Street Kensington Station
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 10:03:37 +0200, "Alan \(in Brussels\)"
wrote: One solution would be to adopt the 'army' practice of putting the generic name first : eg 'brush, hair' followed by 'brush, paint' ; so that a list of station names would have eg Acton followed by Central, East, North, South, Town and West, regardless of the presentation on station nameboards. Or would that only compound the confusion? Which is fine until there is a cock-up involving orders for hangars, coat and hangars, aircraft :-) On parts of the Continent mainline stations within a town are called town identifier, so we might have, say, London Victoria, London Clapham Junction, etc, which can sometimes be slightly confusing for visitors. -- Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK |
High Street Kensington Station
John Rowland wrote to uk.transport.london on Sun, 15 Aug 2004:
Thanks. I've seen a lot of street signs in North London that say something like "Smith St N" instead of "Smith St N1". Do these signs date from an interim period where names were unique to each sector but not to the whole county? If not, what was the point of them? I think these signs date from when London was divided up into N, NW, SE, SW, etc, without numbers. Then they subdivided it: N1, SW2 etc, and now, of course, it is divided up even further into postcodes. No dates for either, sorry! Although postcodes, I know, came in during the 1960s. -- Annabel - "Mrs Redboots" (trying out a new .sig to reflect the personality I use in online forums) |
High Street Kensington Station
Arthur Figgis wrote to uk.transport.london on Sun, 15 Aug 2004:
Which is fine until there is a cock-up involving orders for hangars, coat and hangars, aircraft :-) There wouldn't be if "hangers, coat" were spelt correctly! On parts of the Continent mainline stations within a town are called town identifier, so we might have, say, London Victoria, London Clapham Junction, etc, which can sometimes be slightly confusing for visitors. Well, we do have London Victoria, London Waterloo, etc. Clapham Junction, oddly, is "Not London", or so it is marked on tickets. -- Annabel - "Mrs Redboots" (trying out a new .sig to reflect the personality I use in online forums) |
High Street Kensington Station
Alan (in Brussels) wrote:
IMHO the basic problem is that general English usage requires any additional word(s) specifying which of various options applies to precede the generic name (IOW: we say eg 'East Acton' rather than 'Acton East') But we have Dagenham East, Hounslow West, Bromley South, Penge East, ... I wonder whether the "East Acton" form is used where such a district already existed, and the "Bromley South" form was a new term invented by the railway. But where one such station exists, others with the same town name seem to adopt the same order. Are there in fact any places with both forms in use at different stations, e.g. (fictitious example) Surbiton South and West Surbiton ? -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
High Street Kensington Station
Richard J. wrote:
Alan (in Brussels) wrote: IMHO the basic problem is that general English usage requires any additional word(s) specifying which of various options applies to precede the generic name (IOW: we say eg 'East Acton' rather than 'Acton East') But we have Dagenham East, Hounslow West, Bromley South, Penge East, ... I wonder whether the "East Acton" form is used where such a district already existed, and the "Bromley South" form was a new term invented by the railway. But where one such station exists, others with the same town name seem to adopt the same order. Are there in fact any places with both forms in use at different stations, e.g. (fictitious example) Surbiton South and West Surbiton ? Acton Town & Acton Central plus North, South, East & West Acton (not forgetting poor little Acton Main Line, just to keep the set complete :-) ) There are also the Ealings; North, South, West, Common and Broadway. |
High Street Kensington Station
Piccadilly Pilot wrote:
Richard J. wrote: Alan (in Brussels) wrote: IMHO the basic problem is that general English usage requires any additional word(s) specifying which of various options applies to precede the generic name (IOW: we say eg 'East Acton' rather than 'Acton East') But we have Dagenham East, Hounslow West, Bromley South, Penge East, ... I wonder whether the "East Acton" form is used where such a district already existed, and the "Bromley South" form was a new term invented by the railway. But where one such station exists, others with the same town name seem to adopt the same order. Are there in fact any places with both forms in use at different stations, e.g. (fictitious example) Surbiton South and West Surbiton ? Acton Town & Acton Central plus North, South, East & West Acton (not forgetting poor little Acton Main Line, just to keep the set complete :-) ) There are also the Ealings; North, South, West, Common and Broadway. North Wembley but Wembley Central, Stadium & Park. East Finchley & West Finchley, but Finchley Central. (Are there any "Central Something" stations instead of "Something Central"?) -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
High Street Kensington Station
In message , at 15:54:08 on Sun, 15 Aug
2004, Dave Arquati remarked: (Are there any "Central Something" stations instead of "Something Central"?) Not according to: http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/realtime/fs_realtime.htm -- Roland Perry |
High Street Kensington Station
In article ,
"John Rowland" wrote: "David Boothroyd" wrote in message ... The Metropolitan Board of Works (1855-1889) had begun the work of renaming streets to remove duplicates and stop people getting post intended for the occupant of the same property on a different street of the same name. It changed 3,000 names in its time. The LCC had to be prodded by the Post Office to continue it, and by 1935 it had changed 2,700 names. At this point it began to see light at the end of the tunnel and took a policy decision that there were to be no duplicated names at all. Thanks. I've seen a lot of street signs in North London that say something like "Smith St N" instead of "Smith St N1". Do these signs date from an interim period where names were unique to each sector but not to the whole county? If not, what was the point of them? Yes - originally, London was divided by the Post Office into sectors by compass point in 1858. In 1917 the system was revised and the North Eastern and Southern sectors abolished while the subdivisions were created. Of course postal London does not have the same boundaries as any other incarnation of London administrative boundary. In this period it was usual for people to give their postcode in the form eg "Edgware Road, Western". -- http://www.election.demon.co.uk "The guilty party was the Liberal Democrats and they were hardened offenders, and coded racism was again in evidence in leaflets distributed in September 1993." - Nigel Copsey, "Contemporary British Fascism", page 62. |
High Street Kensington Station
"Richard J." wrote in message ...
Before D stock was introduced on the District, the destination boards on the front of the old CO/CP stock said just "High Street". As did the platform tickets. |
High Street Kensington Station
|
High Street Kensington Station
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 00:05:00 +0100, Peter Beale wrote:
In article , (Alan \(in Brussels\)) wrote: Is it only me who thinks 'High St. Ken' sounds more like the name of a church ;-) Just been reading John Simpson's autobiography - he refers to an Iraqi at a dinner-party seeking to pretend he knows all about England (though he thinks Suffolk = Sussex). I doubt the average American, or ecen European, has heard of Suffolk or Sussex. I'd wager a good number of Brits confuse them. |
High Street Kensington Station
In article , David
Boothroyd writes Incidentally are there only two streets in London which have fractional numbers in them? (Balls Pond Road and London Wall) There is, or was, a cluster of shops just off Upper Ground[*] that went something like 0, 1/3, 1/2, 1, 1 1/2, 2. [*] A quick Google suggests that it may be Gabriel's Wharf. -- Clive D.W. Feather | Home: Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work: Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is: |
High Street Kensington Station
"Paul Weaver" wrote in message
.. . I doubt the average American has heard of Suffolk or Sussex. I suspect the average American has a Suffolk County *and* a Sussex County within 100 miles of their home. -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
High Street Kensington Station
"Clive D. W. Feather" wrote in message
... In article , David Boothroyd writes Incidentally are there only two streets in London which have fractional numbers in them? (Balls Pond Road and London Wall) There is, or was, a cluster of shops just off Upper Ground[*] that went something like 0, 1/3, 1/2, 1, 1 1/2, 2. [*] A quick Google suggests that it may be Gabriel's Wharf. They should have done something like that at the east end of Allendale Avenue, N3. [I can't make head nor tail of the random numbering system they have used.] Incidentally, in Park View (Tokyngton) number 1 is at the dead end! -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
High Street Kensington Station
In message , David
Boothroyd writes Incidentally are there only two streets in London which have fractional numbers in them? (Balls Pond Road and London Wall) No, Dowgate Hill in the City has some for one. -- Ian Jelf, MITG, Birmingham, UK Registered "Blue Badge" Tourist Guide for London & the Heart of England http://www.bluebadge.demon.co.uk |
High Street Kensington Station
Paul Weaver:
I doubt the average American has heard of Suffolk or Sussex. John Rowland: I suspect the average American has a Suffolk County *and* a Sussex County within 100 miles of their home. I was curious enough to look this up. It turns out that there is only one area in the US that's within 100 miles of both a Suffolk County (namely the one that forms the eastern half of Long Island) and a Sussex County (namely the one that forms the northern tip of New Jersey. The western arc bounding the zone runs more or less through the centers of Atlantic City NJ, Philadelphia PA, and Allentown PA; it passes through the Catskills and crosses the Hudson River north of Hudson NY, and ends near the MA/CT/NY common boundary point. Scranton PA, Wilkes- Barre PA, and Albany NY are all a bit outside the zone. The eastern boundary arc is shorter (more of it is at sea), running from the point mentioned above, more or less though the center of Hartford CT, and clipping off the east end of Long Island, ending at Southampton NY. The zone therefore includes the entire metropolitan area of New York City, half of those of Philadelphia and Hartford, and most of the rest of New Jersey. Probably about 10-12% of the US population. (There is one other Suffolk County, which includes the city of Boston, Massachusetts, but the only places that are within 100 miles of it and Sussex County NJ are also within the area described above. There are two other Sussex Counties; one forms the southern 1/3 of Delaware and the other is in southeastern Virginia, a rural district south of Peters- burg. Neither of these is near enough to a Suffolk county to matter.) ObLondon: from Toronto's international airport you can fly nonstop to either of two different Londons. -- Mark Brader, Toronto "These Millennia are like buses." --Arwel Parry My text in this article is in the public domain. |
High Street Kensington Station
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Alan (in Brussels) wrote:
"Dave Arquati" a écrit dans le message de ... John Rowland wrote: From: Benjamin Lukoff ) If the actual name of the street is KENSINGTON HIGH STREET, why is the station called HIGH STREET KENSINGTON? Only 54 months late, but I think I've figured it out. The London County Council decided at some point (1930s I think) that it was going to ensure there were no duplicate road names in its area, and took to renaming vast tracts of the county of London. I suspect that prior to this date, Kensington High St, Clapham High St, Stepney High St etc, and the biggest mouthful of them all St Johns Wood High St, had all been called "High St". Obviously "High St" would have been a crap name for a station. The station could just as well have been called ""Kensington High St" but they happened to pick "High St Kensington" instead. When the streets were renamed, all of the High Streets in London had the district name prefixed, creating the present anomaly. I suppose this was also when the mouthful "Stoke Newington Church Street" was created. Interesting, I've wondered that too... the problem is that many people - especially visitors or newcomers - use Tube stations as landmarks, so just as when someone refers to "Tottenham Court Road" they invariably mean St Giles Circus, most students at Imperial refer to Kensington High St as High St Ken. It seems to roll off the tongue a bit better too. Is it only me who thinks 'High St. Ken' sounds more like the name of a church ;-) Or a mayor. tom -- When I see a man on a bicycle I have hope for the human race. -- H. G. Wells |
High Street Kensington Station
In the message : ...
Piccadilly Pilot wrote: "Dave Arquati" write Richard J. wrote: Alan (in Brussels) wrote: IMHO the basic problem is that general English usage requires any additional word(s) specifying which of various options applies to precede the generic name (IOW: we say eg 'East Acton' rather than 'Acton East') But we have Dagenham East, Hounslow West, Bromley South, Penge East, ... I wonder whether the "East Acton" form is used where such a district already existed, and the "Bromley South" form was a new term invented by the railway. But where one such station exists, others with the same town name seem to adopt the same order. Are there in fact any places with both forms in use at different stations, e.g. (fictitious example) Surbiton South and West Surbiton ? Acton Town & Acton Central plus North, South, East & West Acton (not forgetting poor little Acton Main Line, just to keep the set complete :-) ) There are also the Ealings; North, South, West, Common and Broadway. North Wembley but Wembley Central, Stadium & Park. East Finchley & West Finchley, but Finchley Central. (Are there any "Central Something" stations instead of "Something Central"?) No 'Central something' stations (not even a 'Central Park' somewhere?), but plenty of 'Central something' thoroughfares: according to eg p. 293 (index) of the 2000 OS/Philips London Street atlas there are 5 cases of 'Central Avenue' in different postal districts and another 7 in named boroughs. Also a similar frequency of 'Central Parade' as well as a sprinking of the usual other types: Ct., Gdns., Rd., St., Way... And that perhaps provides an alternative way of answering the OP's question: the rule for street names in English is that the local identification (if any) always precedes the type of throroughfare. Perhaps one day a new station will take its name from the adjacent existing street, and then we'll see which rules apply. Regards, - Alan (in Brussels - mind the spamtrap) |
High Street Kensington Station
|
High Street Kensington Station
In message , at 15:30:17 on Mon, 16
Aug 2004, "Alan (in Brussels)" remarked: No 'Central something' stations (not even a 'Central Park' somewhere?), New York! "Central Park North (110st)" on the 2,3 (Red) line. http://www.mta.nyc.ny.us/nyct/maps/submap.htm -- Roland Perry |
High Street Kensington Station
Alan (in Brussels) wrote:
No 'Central something' stations (not even a 'Central Park' somewhere?), but plenty of 'Central something' thoroughfares: according to eg p. 293 (index) of the 2000 OS/Philips London Street atlas there are 5 cases of 'Central Avenue' in different postal districts and another 7 in named boroughs. Also a similar frequency of 'Central Parade' as well as a sprinking of the usual other types: Ct., Gdns., Rd., St., Way... And that perhaps provides an alternative way of answering the OP's question: the rule for street names in English is that the local identification (if any) always precedes the type of throroughfare. Perhaps one day a new station will take its name from the adjacent existing street, and then we'll see which rules apply. Hmmm, which could have resulted in Queen's Drive East (instead of West Acton) and Queen's Drive West (instead of North Ealing). :-) |
High Street Kensington Station
"Alan":
No 'Central something' stations (not even a 'Central Park' somewhere?), Roland Perry: New York! "Central Park North (110st)" on the 2,3 (Red) line. That is, by the way, a street name. Central Park is bounded by what, in terms of the street grid, are 59th and 110th Streets and 5th and 8th Avenues; but the sections of 59th, 8th, and 110th that are adjacent to the park are instead called Central Park South, West, and North respectively. 5th Avenue keeps its name, though. -- Mark Brader "Eventually, of course, I fell into the trap of Toronto becoming comfortable with find(1)'s syntax..." -- Steve Summit My text in this article is in the public domain. |
High Street Kensington Station
In message , at 15:24:32 on Mon, 16
Aug 2004, Mark Brader remarked: New York! "Central Park North (110st)" on the 2,3 (Red) line. That is, by the way, a street name. As is High St Kensington. What an excellent symmetry. -- Roland Perry |
High Street Kensington Station
"Alan (in Brussels)" wrote in message
... And that perhaps provides an alternative way of answering the OP's question: the rule for street names in English is that the local identification (if any) always precedes the type of throroughfare. .... except that there is a road called High Street Harlesden. This was in Middlesex, not London, until the 1960s. -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
High Street Kensington Station
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 15:24:32 on Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Mark Brader remarked: New York! "Central Park North (110st)" on the 2,3 (Red) line. That is, by the way, a street name. As is High St Kensington. What an excellent symmetry. I thought the point was that High St Kensington is not a street name but Kensington High Street is... :-) -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
High Street Kensington Station
Paul Weaver wrote to uk.transport.london on Mon, 16 Aug 2004:
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 00:05:00 +0100, Peter Beale wrote: Just been reading John Simpson's autobiography - he refers to an Iraqi at a dinner-party seeking to pretend he knows all about England (though he thinks Suffolk = Sussex). I doubt the average American, or ecen European, has heard of Suffolk or Sussex. I'd wager a good number of Brits confuse them. We have just had American guests who confused them..... we had planned to take them to Sussex, but it didn't happen. -- Annabel - "Mrs Redboots" (trying out a new .sig to reflect the personality I use in online forums) |
High Street Kensington Station
"John Rowland" wrote in
: "Alan (in Brussels)" wrote in message ... And that perhaps provides an alternative way of answering the OP's question: the rule for street names in English is that the local identification (if any) always precedes the type of throroughfare. ... except that there is a road called High Street Harlesden. This was in Middlesex, not London, until the 1960s. And in my part of the world we have High Road Leyton, High Road Leytonstone and High Road Woodford Green. Maybe it's an old south west Essex custom ... ? Iain |
High Street Kensington Station
"Piccadilly Pilot" wrote in message
... John Rowland wrote: I've seen a lot of street signs in North London that say something like "Smith St N" instead of "Smith St N1". http://www.wikisearch.net/en/wikiped..._district.html Thanks! -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:57 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk