On 15 Dec 2004 03:24:27 -0800, "Boltar"
wrote:

Says it all:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/4095303.stm
I've had enough of these arseholes. Why can't the goverment step in to
sort these militants out like they did with other industries and if
they won't play ball then just fire the ****ing lot of them. A few
weeks pain as new non unionised drivers are trained will be worth it in
the long run IMO.

As much as I agree with your position, Londoners *had* the chance to
do someting about this.

Steve Norris made it clear he'd remove Bob Crow from the Board of TfL
(I think TfL - or was the Undergound?) and make the RMT an offer that
they'd be mad to refuse.

Instead Londoners voted Red Ken back in.

--
Cheers,

Jason.

In message , Jason
writes

Steve Norris made it clear he'd remove Bob Crow from the Board of TfL
(I think TfL - or was the Undergound?)

Bob Crowe resigned from the board of tfl last June:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/e...on/3838961.stm

--
Paul Terry

On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 16:29:22 +0000, Paul Terry
wrote:

In message , Jason
writes

Steve Norris made it clear he'd remove Bob Crow from the Board of TfL
(I think TfL - or was the Undergound?)

Bob Crowe resigned from the board of tfl last June:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/e...on/3838961.stm

Does this mean the RMT don't have a member on the TfL board? Somehow I
doubt the RMT would let that happen! So, same ****, different
bucket...

--
Cheers,

Jason.

Jason wrote in uk.transport.london on Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:21:09 +0000
:

On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 16:29:22 +0000, Paul Terry
wrote:

Bob Crowe resigned from the board of tfl last June:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/e...on/3838961.stm

Does this mean the RMT don't have a member on the TfL board?

Yes.

http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tfl/abt_board_2004.shtml

HTH


--
'charity begins at home'
- usually an excuse for not allowing it to get abroad
(Chambers 20th Century Dictionary)