Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , John Rowland
writes "Paul Corfield" wrote in message .. . London Buses are also cutting back on vehicle numbers for future bids thus risking the reliability improvements made to date. Is that not the correct response to shortened journey times and improved reliability since the congestion charge was introduced? No, the answer should be to increase frequency and routes to attract more people away from cars particularly outside the central zone. Congestion Charging was introduced on the basis of allowing public transport to be improved - that appears to have happened in the short term, now it must continue or is Ken going back on his justifications for the CC in the first place? -- John Alexander, |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
London Crossrail likely to work any better than Thameslink? | London Transport | |||
Maps, with some observations and some questions | London Transport | |||
Some better, some worse - Amsterdam | London Transport | |||
Some capping examples | London Transport | |||
M4/A4 Chiswick some time last week | London Transport |