Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Arquati wrote:
TheOneKEA wrote: Not really. One of the major stops near the Square is on a very thin sidewalk, and is so busy that people regularly spill out into the street. Very dangerous in heavy traffic, as it forces people to walk out in the street to avoid the crowds. I did notice that. Such a scenario implies to me that the road should probably be pedestrianised, and the bus stop relocated somewhere nearby where people can wait more easily without disrupting the flow of pedestrians. For that particular bus stop (which serves the 65, 371, H37, R68, R70 and more) I think the only thing to do would be to straighten the kink in the road past the Square. The sidewalk on the bus stop side is thin, but the corresponding sidewalk on the other side is quite wide. Of course, that may not be possible in Richmond - but perhaps removing private through traffic might help. Mind you, they have a similar problem in Oxford on a road which is bus-only. George Street could do with being pedestrianised, as long as people could turn right off of Richmond Bridge and climb Richmond Hill, to eventually link up with Queens Road. Otherwise it would be a disaster, especially for the bus routes which use it. Well, for a start, there's a public car park next to the station, though it might be possible to construct a different access to it. Not really. It's hemmed in by buildings on all sides. I didn't notice which side of the station it was. If it's the northern side, It is - right next to platform 7. perhaps Kew Road could be public transport and car park access only. Perhaps more radically, a new car park could be built on the eastern side of the station over the railway line, with access from Church Road, and the current car park replaced with something else. However, I imagine that would be extremely expensive! There's already a car park over there, which is regularly rammed. A far more controversial option would be to build the carpark on top of the District and Windsor lines and ditch the eastern parapets of Church Road bridge. There's certainly no lack of horizontal or vertical space to install a truly massive carpark; the nearby Sheen Road junction provides access as well. The problem with the inner parts of Richmond (i.e. George Street and the Quad) is that it is used by everyone coming inward from the A305 Sheen Rd., Richmond Bridge via Hill Street and Petersham Road to get onto the A316. If more people went via Queens Road to Sheen Road, across the Windsor lines and down into the Manor Road area, it could improve things enormously. Could the Manor Road level crossing cope with the extra traffic? I don't think so. Unless SWT could be persuaded to divert some of the Reading semifasts and a few of the west-of-Hounslow stoppers via the loop, I suspect that people would do a lot of waiting at the level crossing. If not, I wonder how much it would cost to grade-separate it. fx: loud and raucous laughter It's hemmed in on both sides by houses and retail developments. You would have to build a diveunder and take the Windsor lines underneath the road. Oh, and you'd have to reconstruct North Sheen station, and probably knock down the buildings immediately on either side of the crossing. IOW, grade separation is unlikely. Is there a reason why traffic from the Bridge comes through the town centre, rather than reaching the A316 via St Margarets? No clue. Perhaps a key road in St. Margarets is blocked, or maybe the roundabouts southwest of Twickenham Bridge are even worse than the Kew roundabout... |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
TheOneKEA wrote:
Dave Arquati wrote: TheOneKEA wrote: [Richard J. wrote:] there's a public car park next to the station, though it might be possible to construct a different access to it. Not really. It's hemmed in by buildings on all sides. I didn't notice which side of the station it was. If it's the northern side, It is - right next to platform 7. That's the small SWT car park (56 spaces). The one I meant is the multi-storey NCP car park on the *south* side (410 spaces), accessed from The Quadrant. -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
TheOneKEA wrote:
Dave Arquati wrote: TheOneKEA wrote: Not really. One of the major stops near the Square is on a very thin sidewalk, and is so busy that people regularly spill out into the street. Very dangerous in heavy traffic, as it forces people to walk out in the street to avoid the crowds. I did notice that. Such a scenario implies to me that the road should probably be pedestrianised, and the bus stop relocated somewhere nearby where people can wait more easily without disrupting the flow of pedestrians. For that particular bus stop (which serves the 65, 371, H37, R68, R70 and more) I think the only thing to do would be to straighten the kink in the road past the Square. The sidewalk on the bus stop side is thin, but the corresponding sidewalk on the other side is quite wide. Of course, that may not be possible in Richmond - but perhaps removing private through traffic might help. Mind you, they have a similar problem in Oxford on a road which is bus-only. George Street could do with being pedestrianised, as long as people could turn right off of Richmond Bridge and climb Richmond Hill, to eventually link up with Queens Road. Otherwise it would be a disaster, especially for the bus routes which use it. From what I saw of Richmond Hill, it didn't look particularly amenable to high volumes of traffic, BICBW. Mind you, Richmond town centre doesn't seem particularly amenable to lots of traffic either... Well, for a start, there's a public car park next to the station, though it might be possible to construct a different access to it. Not really. It's hemmed in by buildings on all sides. I didn't notice which side of the station it was. If it's the northern side, It is - right next to platform 7. perhaps Kew Road could be public transport and car park access only. Perhaps more radically, a new car park could be built on the eastern side of the station over the railway line, with access from Church Road, and the current car park replaced with something else. However, I imagine that would be extremely expensive! There's already a car park over there, which is regularly rammed. A far more controversial option would be to build the carpark on top of the District and Windsor lines and ditch the eastern parapets of Church Road bridge. There's certainly no lack of horizontal or vertical space to install a truly massive carpark; the nearby Sheen Road junction provides access as well. Of course, the problem with building a massive car park is that it will probably encourage more people to drive to Richmond station when they would have otherwise walked, used the bus or used a more local station. The problem with the inner parts of Richmond (i.e. George Street and the Quad) is that it is used by everyone coming inward from the A305 Sheen Rd., Richmond Bridge via Hill Street and Petersham Road to get onto the A316. If more people went via Queens Road to Sheen Road, across the Windsor lines and down into the Manor Road area, it could improve things enormously. Could the Manor Road level crossing cope with the extra traffic? I don't think so. Unless SWT could be persuaded to divert some of the Reading semifasts and a few of the west-of-Hounslow stoppers via the loop, I suspect that people would do a lot of waiting at the level crossing. If not, I wonder how much it would cost to grade-separate it. fx: loud and raucous laughter It's hemmed in on both sides by houses and retail developments. You would have to build a diveunder and take the Windsor lines underneath the road. Oh, and you'd have to reconstruct North Sheen station, and probably knock down the buildings immediately on either side of the crossing. IOW, grade separation is unlikely. So the answer is "expensive". :-) Is there a reason why traffic from the Bridge comes through the town centre, rather than reaching the A316 via St Margarets? No clue. Perhaps a key road in St. Margarets is blocked, or maybe the roundabouts southwest of Twickenham Bridge are even worse than the Kew roundabout... -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New freight centre cuts emissions and lorry trips by 70 per cent | London Transport News | |||
Transport Commissioner launches London Construction Consolidation Centre | London Transport News | |||
CTRL Visitor Centre | London Transport | |||
The Architectural Reclaim Centre in Crews Hill | London Transport | |||
Camden Town Travel Centre | London Transport |