On 17 Jun 2005 08:24:13 -0700, "David Martin"
wrote:



Steven wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 14:46:10 +0100, "Dave Larrington"
wrote:

One could, however, argue that had they specified trains which could carry a
sensible number of bikes in the first place.

They *will* carry a sensible number of cycles.

They just can't cope with the number that they'd get for an event such as this.

I use Electrostars regularly, and have never seen more than two bikes in one
carriage. And that's *very* rare. You can't expect then to waste space on
providing facilities that are rarely used but would detract from the comfort and
utility of the trains for their bread and butter work.

The answer is to have trains that are flexible use. Ie carriages that
will allow bulky luggage, prams, bikes, wheelchairs etc. or hods of
standing cattle^^^^^^^commuters during crush hour. There is nothing to
be lost and everything to be gained from such a configuration. Oh,
except that people might actually use the trains with a bit more than
just a small briefcase..

You can do all that on an Electrostar.

There is a limit, however.

Just the same as there is a limit to the number of people you can squeeze on.