![]() |
|
timescale wrong
In message m, Roland
Perry writes - excepting the fold-down seats on the Picc of course. Which fold-up the moment you stop sitting on them... Those will be the folding seats that the Piccadilly doesn't have then?? -- Steve Fitzgerald has now left the building. You will find him in London's Docklands, E16, UK (please use the reply to address for email) |
timescale fixed (was timescale wrong) w/ questions for Clive
|
timescale fixed (was timescale wrong) w/ questions for Clive
In article m, Roland
Perry writes How likely is it for two Circle Line trains to be within a minute of each other at KXSP between 8:30 and 9:00 in the morning? If the former, it's extremely unlikely. If the latter, it's very likely. (Noting that perhaps one in six trains on the tracks are likely to be Circle rather than Metropolitan or H&C). More like one in four. The trains are supposed to be 2 minutes apart, and there are 7 Circles with a circulation time of 50 minutes. So 7 trains in 25 are Circles. In 30 minutes there are 15 arrivals on each line. Probably 4 on (say) the Inner Rail are Circles. So the probability of there also being a Circle on the Outer Rail at the same time as a given one of these is 4/15, and the probability of one of the four getting a coincidence is roughly 1 - (1 - 4/15)^4, or about 0.7. [Yes, that simplifies some issues.] -- Clive D.W. Feather | Home: Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work: Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is: |
timescale fixed (was timescale wrong) w/ questions for Clive
Clive D. W. Feather wrote: In article m, Roland Perry writes How likely is it for two Circle Line trains to be within a minute of each other at KXSP between 8:30 and 9:00 in the morning? If the former, it's extremely unlikely. If the latter, it's very likely. (Noting that perhaps one in six trains on the tracks are likely to be Circle rather than Metropolitan or H&C). More like one in four. The trains are supposed to be 2 minutes apart, and there are 7 Circles with a circulation time of 50 minutes. So 7 trains in 25 are Circles. In 30 minutes there are 15 arrivals on each line. Probably 4 on (say) the Inner Rail are Circles. So the probability of there also being a Circle on the Outer Rail at the same time as a given one of these is 4/15, and the probability of one of the four getting a coincidence is roughly 1 - (1 - 4/15)^4, or about 0.7. [Yes, that simplifies some issues.] This is why I love USENET and hate blogs :) Here's what I'm still confused by... assume they really had separate bombers for each bomb.... seems like a long time before boarding the Piccadilly Line. I'm guessing they synchronized the timers BEFORE they got on the trains. Probably around 8:31 for 20 minutes or 8:36 for 15 minutes. That would have been while they were all standing together on the KXSP platform. That explains the Circle Line bombs. The 311 train on Piccadilly.... you need 20 minutes to get that train? Hell ... do you need 15 minutes to get to the 311 if you were on the Circle Line platform when the 204 and 216 arrived? I can't believe he got there in 5 minutes and then waited for a couple of trains to pass so he could get one that would blow up about 45 seconds outside of the station. |
timescale fixed (was timescale wrong) w/ questions for Clive
|
timescale fixed (was timescale wrong) w/ questions for Clive
|
timescale wrong
In message , at 23:55:25 on Tue, 12
Jul 2005, Steve Fitzgerald ] remarked: - excepting the fold-down seats on the Picc of course. Which fold-up the moment you stop sitting on them... Those will be the folding seats that the Piccadilly doesn't have then?? Well, there you go. At least it's less misleading to mis-remember the seats than to suggest they have luggage bins! It must be the Northern that has the folding seats... -- Roland Perry |
timescale fixed (was timescale wrong) w/ questions for Clive
Paul Terry wrote: In message .com, writes The 311 train on Piccadilly.... you need 20 minutes to get that train? Hell ... do you need 15 minutes to get to the 311 if you were on the Circle Line platform when the 204 and 216 arrived? I can't believe he got there in 5 minutes and then waited for a couple of trains to pass so he could get one that would blow up about 45 seconds outside of the station. As discussed in this newsgroup last week, the service had been suspended on the Piccadilly line immediately prior to the bomb, due to a fire alert incident at Caledonian Road. It is quite likely that 311 was the first train through after a long gap in service. Excellent point. If that is the case then I suppose the intended detonation point was somewhere further south like Piccadilly Circus or Green Park. Piccadilly Circus is about 8 minutes out and you would be leaving the station if you caught the 8:41 or entering the station if you caught the 8:43 from KXSP. Piccadilly Circus would be better for international recognition, but I wonder what the track configuration is there v. Green Park. I mention this because the other two blastswere both near junctions about 10 minutes out from KXSP. -- Paul Terry |
Destination Driven plan? (was timescale fixed (was timescale wrong) w/ questions for Clive)
I am scrubbing all the speculation about how they could have synchronized departures etc. and wondering if the targets were really junctions. The Circle Line trains look like they blew up right near junctions (Aldgate Junction and Praed Street Junction). Given the unexpected delay on the Piccadilly Line, it now seems reasonable that the perp caught the first train available even though he had ample time to get to the platform. Had things been running smoothly, I'm guessing he was intending to detonate around Piccadilly Circus (a junction and an internationally renowned location) or Green Park (another junction). Which one was the target depends on which train you caught (the 8:41 or the 8:43) assuming you want a synchronized blast with trains that are near Aldgate Junction and Praed Street Junction. |
Destination Driven plan? (was timescale fixed (was timescale wrong) w/ questions for Clive)
In article .com,
wrote: Had things been running smoothly, I'm guessing he was intending to detonate around Piccadilly Circus (a junction and an internationally renowned location) or Green Park (another junction). Which one was the Why do you think Piccadilly Circus or Green Park are junctions ? They're not. Nick -- http://www.leverton.org/ ... So express yourself |
timescale fixed (was timescale wrong) w/ questions for Clive
|
timescale fixed (was timescale wrong) w/ questions for Clive
In article .com,
wrote: Piccadilly Circus would be better for international recognition, but I wonder what the track configuration is there v. Green Park. I mention this because the other two blastswere both near junctions about 10 minutes out from KXSP. Green Park layout, in diagrammatic form: -------------------------- ============ ============ -------------------------- Piccadilly Circus: -------------------------- ============ ============ -------------------------- ------ running line ====== platform tunnel Platform layout is from CULG (thanks Clive) - note both have two distinct platform tunnels, this is not indicating a central island. Nick -- http://www.leverton.org/ ... So express yourself |
Destination Driven plan? (was timescale fixed (was timescale wrong) w/ questions for Clive)
Nick Leverton wrote: In article .com, wrote: Had things been running smoothly, I'm guessing he was intending to detonate around Piccadilly Circus (a junction and an internationally renowned location) or Green Park (another junction). Which one was the Why do you think Piccadilly Circus or Green Park are junctions ? They're not. Wrong word. Lines converge at both places and that seemed to be important on the two Circle Line blasts. |
Destination Driven plan? (was timescale fixed (was timescale wrong) w/ questions for Clive)
yped
Nick Leverton wrote: In article .com, wrote: Had things been running smoothly, I'm guessing he was intending to detonate around Piccadilly Circus (a junction and an internationally renowned location) or Green Park (another junction). Which one was the Why do you think Piccadilly Circus or Green Park are junctions ? They're not. Wrong word. Lines converge at both places and that seemed to be important on the two Circle Line blasts. You don't mean converge, you mean there's an interchange between Underground lines. Tighten up your text! -- Helen D. Vecht: Edgware. |
timescale wrong
Steve Dulieu wrote:
"Steve Fitzgerald" ] wrote in message ... I've just received a document that suggest some tests are being done today to see if using Wood Green to reverse is feasible. I have no more details on what is planned though. Steve?? Not going to happen. Currently cooking up something a bit more exciting... Still on tenterhooks wondering what that could be. It all depends on how long the Picc will be out of service. If we're talking MANY months (and I just checked, and KX Northern Line was closed for 16 months after the fire, so my guess is we're looking at a closure of 1-2 years), then maybe the 'bit more exciting' would be to replace the trailing crossover at King's Cross with a facing one and let westbound trains reverse on the eastbound line south of KX. Assuming the tunnel profile can take it (possible either way; I don't exactly remember) they could probably get that up and running, at least hand-worked, within weeks. Eventually they'd have to put the trailing crossover back, both because facing crossovers are frowned upon when not strictly necessary and because it would be a total pain to get stock off the Northern to get to Acton Works if it was still there, but it would allow the Picc to operate between KX and Cockfosters in the interim. |
Destination Driven plan? (was timescale fixed (was timescale wrong) w/ questions for Clive)
In article .com,
wrote: Nick Leverton wrote: Why do you think Piccadilly Circus or Green Park are junctions ? They're not. Wrong word. Lines converge at both places and that seemed to be important on the two Circle Line blasts. I don't know why you think that either. On a quick and non-rigorous check, I make it 34 interchange stations within the approx. area of Zone 1, and 23 non-interchange ones. Both counts are probably low as I couldn't be bothered to check where all the boundaries are. However using those figures, if the bombers were working on a purely random basis, it is likely that two bombs would explode at interchanges (p=0.51), but not that three bombs would (p=0.37). Which is in fact what happened. Also, if you mean that because lines have an interchange, a bomb on one must affect the others, you can see a layout of Piccadilly Circus he http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...069/ltpicc.gif which shows the lines are completely independent, whilst Green Park is infamous for the long distance between lines at the interchange. Nick -- http://www.leverton.org/ ... So express yourself |
Destination Driven plan? (was timescale fixed (was timescale wrong) w/ questions for Clive)
In article , Nick Leverton
writes I don't know why you think that either. On a quick and non-rigorous check, I make it 34 interchange stations within the approx. area of Zone 1, and 23 non-interchange ones. Using the current map, I make it: * 27 stations with interchange between lines * 22 station on one line only * 8 stations served by one LU line but also a mainline service * 4 stations (Aldgate, Aldgate East, Edgware Road [subsurface], and HSK) which are divergence points for subsurface routes Euston Square, and High Street Kensington) which can be * Euston Square, which is arguably a mainline interchange and arguably not. So of 62 stations, between 27 and 40 are "interchanges". -- Clive D.W. Feather | Home: Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work: Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is: |
CCTV - timescale fixed (was timescale wrong) w/ questions for Clive
In article ,
(Neil Williams) wrote: On 13 Jul 2005 07:01:11 -0700, wrote: Piccadilly Circus would be better for international recognition, but I wonder what the track configuration is there v. Green Park. I mention this because the other two blastswere both near junctions about 10 minutes out from KXSP. Thinking about this, could it therefore be that the bus bomb failed to go off on time, and the holder of it was therefore panicking and trying to return to base? Once the perpetrator is identified, I wonder if he was seen on CCTV boarding a train earlier on? Neil There is also CCTV equipment with cameras in all the cars on the newer trains. This could possibly provide vital information following an incident, especially when that incident is on the train or following the trail of a suspect. However, On the Northern Line, a large percent of the equipment is faulty and has been for a long while with no urgency to rectify it, so it's unlikely that it would be of any help. Roger |
CCTV - timescale fixed (was timescale wrong) w/ questions for Clive
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:57 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk