Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Anthropy" wrote in message ... Why the top floor of a bus? You are a not a bright individual are you. So you don't agree that the bomb would have killed many more if it had been detonated on the lower floor. Strange almost everyone including experts from "Janes" agree that it would have. No doubt you know better and will provide us with your evidence. And the tube bombs? You conveniently left those out. What a cretin Seems that you are indeed a cretin. Er....well........still waiting for facts butthead Nice evasion there girl. Maybe Al Queda are getting a conscience. Cite please. Where are these facts Excuse me. I was asking YOU to cite your evidence as to your claim that "Al Queda are getting a conscience." ...what an arsehole Yep you sure are an arsehole. This attack was designed to minimise casualties, hardly in keeping with the US image of Islamic extremists. "This attack was designed to minimise casualties" Bloody hell - I have heard some lame attempts to justify the actions of those that support these criminals but that has to be one of the lamest. Think before you post. "to minimise casualties" they would have:- 1) Not undertaken this act during rush hour. How old are you? Have you reached puberty yet? Your pathetic witterings indicate you are still in your teens, probably 13 or 14. Go find a chat room. You'll find it more your level. So instead of offering up a rebuttal you instead resort to yet more juvenile insults I see. If as you say "This attack was designed to minimise casualties" They would not have chosen the time that they did. You fail to offer any rebuttal. 2) Given prior warnings to appropriate authorities so that evacuations could be attempted. Even the IRA saw fit to give warnings. Sometimes there were warnings sometimes there weren't. you obviously have very limited knowledge of the subject yet you still pontificate, what an idiot. Temper dear girl. You are letting it get the better of you. You are also clutching at straws and not making sense. Anyway you admit that the IRA gave warnings. So if your heroes had intended to that "This attack was designed to minimise casualties" surely they would have, in this case, given out warnings. If - as you claim "This attack was designed to minimise casualties". They would then have caused the terror and stoppage of trade etc AND MINIMISED injury and death. They did not do so - therefore they did not intend "to minimise casualties" as you rather pathetically claim Christ you're a ****ing moron. There you go with letting your temper get the better of you again. Try reading a newspaper and you may find stories suggesting that the attack is going to cost the UK millions if not billions in insurance, less tourists, heightened awareness from the security services etc. Still you offer nothing but evasion - and you are also unwittingly proving my argument to the cost of your own it must be noted. 3) Give prior warnings to cause terror and stoppage of London but place fake bombs to be found by Police etc after evacuation of Stations. They did not therefore your heroes did NOT intend "to minimise casualties" So you believe the criminals could not have made the bombs any bigger??? or the poor broke criminals could only afford to buy 4 bombs? Indeed they could have made them bigger - they did not need to it seems. But is this really your only reason for thinking that "This attack was designed to minimise casualties". As I said before - and you confirm with your response - you have little if any understanding of the subject in hand. For instance butthead, There you go again. I have touched a nerve. if they had really been after mass casualties why didn't they detonate the bombs the weekend before in Hyde Park. They would have got thousands. It's obvious to anyone except ****headed warmongers who need excuses for the slaughter in Iraq and Afghanistan that this was an attack purposely designed to minimise casualties but to increase the fear factor. The only question is why? You have not made you case - but then that is because you do not have one of any weight. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cycle Hire south western expansion goes live today | London Transport | |||
The champagne is flowing in a South Wales junkyard today | London Transport | |||
The champagne is flowing in a South Wales junkyard today | London Transport | |||
The champagne is flowing in a South Wales junkyard today | London Transport | |||
Slam door carriage torn apart on BBC South Today | London Transport |