"America the Beautiful" wrote in message
...


Ken Ehrett wrote:

On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 14:03:04 GMT, Anthropy wrote:


On Sat, 9 Jul 2005 10:11:55 +0100, "encyclopedia"
wrote:


"Anthropy" wrote in message

m...


If Al Queda are so ruthless, why only 10lb bombs?

Think about it. You clearly know little about the subject.

No doubt you are going to enlighten us

If you did you would not have posed such a question.


Well.......


Why the top floor of
a bus?

You are a not a bright individual are you.

So you don't agree that the bomb would have killed many more if it had
been detonated on the lower floor. Strange almost everyone including
experts from "Janes" agree that it would have. No doubt you know
better and will provide us with your evidence. What a cretin


There are also many reasons why the bomb was not planted on the lower
floor. There may have been surveillance or a police presence on the
lower floor at the time of their actions. There may have been any of
a number of events on the lower floor that would have raised the risk
of detection to an unacceptable level.

I love how you always manage to confuse him with logic. He must be foaming
at the mouth right now.


It is being suggested that the bus was actually an improvised target
selected after the bomber got caught up in the closures of the system after
the initial bombs exploded. Unable to find the original target the bomber
had to think on its feet. Witnesses are saying that they saw an agitated
individual on the bus who was nervously fidgeting with the contents of a
bag. The fact that the bomb was exploded upstairs was due to reasons,
including those made by Ken Ehrett , other than an attempt to 'minimise the
carnage' as suggested by Anthropy in his lame attempt to put a humanitarian
gloss on the actions of his heroes.

On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 09:28:39 +0100, "encyclopedia"
wrote:

So you don't agree that the bomb would have killed many more if it had
been detonated on the lower floor. Strange almost everyone including
experts from "Janes" agree that it would have. No doubt you know
better and will provide us with your evidence. What a cretin


There are also many reasons why the bomb was not planted on the lower
floor. There may have been surveillance or a police presence on the
lower floor at the time of their actions. There may have been any of
a number of events on the lower floor that would have raised the risk
of detection to an unacceptable level.

I love how you always manage to confuse him with logic. He must be foaming
at the mouth right now.


It is being suggested that the bus was actually an improvised target
selected after the bomber got caught up in the closures of the system after
the initial bombs exploded. Unable to find the original target the bomber
had to think on its feet. Witnesses are saying that they saw an agitated
individual on the bus who was nervously fidgeting with the contents of a
bag. The fact that the bomb was exploded upstairs was due to reasons,
including those made by Ken Ehrett , other than an attempt to 'minimise the
carnage' as suggested by Anthropy in his lame attempt to put a humanitarian
gloss on the actions of his heroes.

You are correct sir. There are very few things in life that turn out
the way you want them to regardless of how well you plan them in
advance. When attempting to bomb a city like London there are many
variables that will foil the best of plots. London has many many
surveillance cameras, well trained police in terrorist prevention and
citizens who are very alert to their surroundings and who will spot
and report strange behavior to the authorities immediately. You can't
walk around in a city like London dragging a 200 pound bag of TNT
behind you and not have your behavior called into question. Anthropy
just simply does not want to accept that his beloved "freedom
fighters" are a bunch of skunks who would ever do something like this
in his own back yard. Thus, he must now launch a "conspiracy theory"
to plant the seed that someone else must be behind these bombings.