Real meaning of names.
 

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 00:43:49 GMT, Anthropy wrote:

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:19:09 -0400, Ken Ehrett wrote:

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 16:44:16 GMT, Anthropy wrote:

Well, if you and Ken are such good buddies you'll have plenty of
pics with BOTH of you in them. Post one and put the rumour of Ken
being your sock to bed once and for all. Of course if you don't or try
to hide behind some bull**** excuse it's definite proof that Ken is
your sock.
Over to you.
By the way, I have some very sophisticated graphics software which
will allow me to easily detect a "Photoshopped" image.

I find it amazing that a scum bag limey posting under an alias who was
caught red handed lying about his profession early on in antu would
have the ****ing nerve to point a finger at another poster using his
real name and email address. Doesn't Blighty have some program to get
you drunks off the streets?

Where's the pic of both you and Sarah TOGETHER? 10 years as bosom
buddies or should that be imaginary butt buddies and you don't have
one pic to post. Yeah right, lol.

What's your real verifiable name Assthrobby? By now everyone knows
you're such a cowardly pussy you won't even archive your posts under a
nym. smirk

Real meaning of names.
 

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 19:53:24 -0400, Sarah Czepiel
wrote:

Ken and Sarah. Don't they sound like a lovely couple?
If we are to believe that Sarah is the "real" person and Ken is the
sock we have to ask ourselves why does she do this?

Because she's an ugly *old* housewife with nothing better to fill her
dull days?

After drooling over my picture for 6 months even you don't believe
that, Fatty. However don't let it lessen your entertainment value as
you lurch and waddle from thread to thread propping up your gay lover.

A tragic ugly *old* woman who's only flame is "you're gay"...

Real meaning of names.
 

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 00:51:21 GMT, Anthropy wrote:

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:41:30 -0400, Sarah Czepiel
wrote:

As in " Miss Anthropy's Advice to the Lovelorn " ? BWAHAHAHAHA!!
Yeah ok, Miss Anthropy.....

Damn, you finally got me, ok what's your problem? I can help.

You can help Ugly Sarah with her nightmare looks and terminal laming
problems??

Real meaning of names.
 

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 22:49:21 GMT, the guvnor
wrote:

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:58:28 GMT, Anthropy wrote:

Well, since we don't know your real name because you are too much of a
****ing coward and pussy to use it in your anonymous posts

This from a sock??

Ken and Sarah. Don't they sound like a lovely couple?
If we are to believe that Sarah is the "real" person and Ken is the
sock we have to ask ourselves why does she do this?

Because she's an ugly *old* housewife with nothing better to fill her
dull days?

She still claiming not to be Ken Ehrett?
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Priceless.

Real meaning of names.
 

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 06:55:31 GMT, the guvnor
wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 00:51:21 GMT, Anthropy wrote:

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:41:30 -0400, Sarah Czepiel
wrote:

As in " Miss Anthropy's Advice to the Lovelorn " ? BWAHAHAHAHA!!
Yeah ok, Miss Anthropy.....

Damn, you finally got me, ok what's your problem? I can help.

You can help Ugly Sarah with her nightmare looks and terminal laming
problems??

She's got nothing that a quick dip in a vat of acid won't improve.

Real meaning of names.
 

Anthropy wrote:

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:14:21 -0400, Ken Ehrett wrote:


On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:58:28 GMT, Anthropy wrote:


On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 11:35:22 -0400, Sarah Czepiel
wrote:


On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 07:55:30 GMT, the guvnor
wrote:


On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 00:22:26 -0400, Ken Ehrett wrote:


Well, since we don't know your real name because you are too much of a
****ing coward and pussy to use it in your anonymous posts

This from a sock??

Ken and Sarah. Don't they sound like a lovely couple?
If we are to believe that Sarah is the "real" person and Ken is the
sock we have to ask ourselves why does she do this? Maybe it's an
naive attempt to imitate the police during the questioning of a
suspect i.e nice policeman (Sarah), nasty policeman (Ken). The trouble
is it's not to hard to wind up Sarah till Ken pops out.
I also wonder if this "relationship" is confined to antu or are we
merely seeing a manifestation of it. For example perhaps Sarah's
neighbours wonder about her illusive partner. They can hear her
talking to him through the walls but no-one has ever seen him. The
strangest thing is they make love regularly every Friday night, but
Ken is never seen. (perhaps)
Come on, if you're a neighbour or confidant of Sarah's, tell all. Dish
the dirt, we're all friends here.

This all sounds fascinating. But then it all comes from a chicken
**** limey hiding behind an alias. Oh the irony.....


How do you know Anthropy is not my real name? I have never said it
wasn't.

Well, if that's your real name, you should slap your mother....

--
Chris F.
Long Island.

"A country soars its highest when it soars on the Wings of Freedom."
God Bless America.

Real meaning of names.
 

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 00:43:49 GMT, Anthropy wrote:

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:19:09 -0400, Ken Ehrett wrote:

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 16:44:16 GMT, Anthropy wrote:

Well, if you and Ken are such good buddies you'll have plenty of
pics with BOTH of you in them. Post one and put the rumour of Ken
being your sock to bed once and for all. Of course if you don't or try
to hide behind some bull**** excuse it's definite proof that Ken is
your sock.
Over to you.
By the way, I have some very sophisticated graphics software which
will allow me to easily detect a "Photoshopped" image.

I find it amazing that a scum bag limey posting under an alias who was
caught red handed lying about his profession early on in antu would
have the ****ing nerve to point a finger at another poster using his
real name and email address. Doesn't Blighty have some program to get
you drunks off the streets?

Where's the pic of both you and Sarah TOGETHER? 10 years as bosom
buddies or should that be imaginary butt buddies and you don't have
one pic to post. Yeah right, lol.

Who would I post it to? I can't find Anthropy listed anywhere.

Real meaning of names.
 

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 01:38:03 GMT, Anthropy wrote:

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 21:03:35 -0400, Sarah Czepiel
wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 00:43:49 GMT, Anthropy wrote:

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:19:09 -0400, Ken Ehrett wrote:

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 16:44:16 GMT, Anthropy wrote:

Well, if you and Ken are such good buddies you'll have plenty of
pics with BOTH of you in them. Post one and put the rumour of Ken
being your sock to bed once and for all. Of course if you don't or try
to hide behind some bull**** excuse it's definite proof that Ken is
your sock.
Over to you.
By the way, I have some very sophisticated graphics software which
will allow me to easily detect a "Photoshopped" image.

I find it amazing that a scum bag limey posting under an alias who was
caught red handed lying about his profession early on in antu would
have the ****ing nerve to point a finger at another poster using his
real name and email address. Doesn't Blighty have some program to get
you drunks off the streets?

Where's the pic of both you and Sarah TOGETHER? 10 years as bosom
buddies or should that be imaginary butt buddies and you don't have
one pic to post. Yeah right, lol.

What's your real verifiable name Assthrobby? By now everyone knows
you're such a cowardly pussy you won't even archive your posts under a
nym. smirk

Yes, my posts aren't archived. The reason for that is because I don't want
to look like a complete asshole when someone makes me eat them in my
next failed argument. Even people who hide behind nyms have a little
pride unless they are offered a recording contract by Slim Witman. What
the hell man, it beats eating out of a skip all the time.

We thought as much.

Real meaning of names.
 

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 00:19:30 GMT, Anthropy wrote:

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:14:21 -0400, Ken Ehrett wrote:

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:58:28 GMT, Anthropy wrote:

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 11:35:22 -0400, Sarah Czepiel
wrote:

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 07:55:30 GMT, the guvnor
wrote:

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 00:22:26 -0400, Ken Ehrett wrote:

Well, since we don't know your real name because you are too much of a
****ing coward and pussy to use it in your anonymous posts

This from a sock??

Ken and Sarah. Don't they sound like a lovely couple?
If we are to believe that Sarah is the "real" person and Ken is the
sock we have to ask ourselves why does she do this? Maybe it's an
naive attempt to imitate the police during the questioning of a
suspect i.e nice policeman (Sarah), nasty policeman (Ken). The trouble
is it's not to hard to wind up Sarah till Ken pops out.
I also wonder if this "relationship" is confined to antu or are we
merely seeing a manifestation of it. For example perhaps Sarah's
neighbours wonder about her illusive partner. They can hear her
talking to him through the walls but no-one has ever seen him. The
strangest thing is they make love regularly every Friday night, but
Ken is never seen. (perhaps)
Come on, if you're a neighbour or confidant of Sarah's, tell all. Dish
the dirt, we're all friends here.

This all sounds fascinating. But then it all comes from a chicken
**** limey hiding behind an alias. Oh the irony.....

How do you know Anthropy is not my real name? I have never said it
wasn't.

You told us you were a lawyer, then you said you were a gay model so
at this point the only way we have of determining that you're lying is
when you lips are moving.

Real meaning of names.
 

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 00:51:21 GMT, Anthropy wrote:

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:41:30 -0400, Sarah Czepiel
wrote:

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 00:19:30 GMT, Anthropy wrote:

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:14:21 -0400, Ken Ehrett wrote:

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:58:28 GMT, Anthropy wrote:

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 11:35:22 -0400, Sarah Czepiel
wrote:

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 07:55:30 GMT, the guvnor
wrote:

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 00:22:26 -0400, Ken Ehrett wrote:

Well, since we don't know your real name because you are too much of a
****ing coward and pussy to use it in your anonymous posts

This from a sock??

Ken and Sarah. Don't they sound like a lovely couple?
If we are to believe that Sarah is the "real" person and Ken is the
sock we have to ask ourselves why does she do this? Maybe it's an
naive attempt to imitate the police during the questioning of a
suspect i.e nice policeman (Sarah), nasty policeman (Ken). The trouble
is it's not to hard to wind up Sarah till Ken pops out.
I also wonder if this "relationship" is confined to antu or are we
merely seeing a manifestation of it. For example perhaps Sarah's
neighbours wonder about her illusive partner. They can hear her
talking to him through the walls but no-one has ever seen him. The
strangest thing is they make love regularly every Friday night, but
Ken is never seen. (perhaps)
Come on, if you're a neighbour or confidant of Sarah's, tell all. Dish
the dirt, we're all friends here.

This all sounds fascinating. But then it all comes from a chicken
**** limey hiding behind an alias. Oh the irony.....

How do you know Anthropy is not my real name? I have never said it
wasn't.

As in " Miss Anthropy's Advice to the Lovelorn " ? BWAHAHAHAHA!!
Yeah ok, Miss Anthropy.....

Damn, you finally got me, ok what's your problem? I can help.

Maybe you can. There is this really fat greasy porker who works in a
South Wales junkyard who tried to molest my beagle when I was down
there picking up a head light bracket and I was wondering if you could
talk him into stabbing himself in the head with an ice pick?