Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Matt Wheeler wrote: SNIP! Towards Amersham, from Aylesbury, the trains enter LUL track at, presumably, 60mph at "Mantles Wood Junction". Where is the first LUL signal with trip after the junction and before Amersham station, presumably before the siding line into the main london bound platform at Amersham... but how close, as the trains will still be travelling at some speed at that point. Yep. Signal JW1. Depending on how you drive, you would be doing anywhere between 60 and about 40 there. You would always be slowing down for the platform at Amersham, because you are either calling at the station, or slowing down for the Tripcock Test in the in the platform at Amersham (its a white light by the side of the signal. There is a device that looks like a pedal on the track, and you must pass over that at no more than 10mph. If the white light goes out, the test is passed, and you can proceed normally, if the light stays on, the test is failed and you dont go any further) There was a tripcock tester on exiting Amersham towards Aylesbury on platform 3, where the vast majority of Chiltern services are routed. This has been removed, and there now sits a 15mph speed limit through the station. Ive not been through platform 2 exiting the LUL since the tripcock tester on 3 has been removed, though im fairly certain that the tester is still there. The effects of dangling tripcocks striking raised trainstops doesnt seem to be a problem. Trains have been working like this for years, and the world is still spinning. Fair enough, its got people talking on here about it, and some of the comments have been interesting, but the system works, and LUL, who dont change anything (there are still "off" indicators at a lot of Met stations!) unless they really have to, arent going to change something that isnt causing them a problem any time soon. As for the maximum speed limit on the LUL, well, there is a very grey area at Amersham. There is a 70mph speed limit sign between Amersham station and the Network Rail boundry, beyond the electrified track. Now im told that the maximum speed anywhere on the LUL is 60mph. Ive never seen this written down, but ive been told many times by many different people that it is. But this 70mph sign exists. Can trains do 70mph there, or is this 60mph limit real? I for one keep on acclerating past 60mph. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18 Jul 2005 20:17:11 -0700 someone who may be "Minna Daisuki
Katamari Damacy" wrote this:- The effects of dangling tripcocks striking raised trainstops doesnt seem to be a problem. About 100 years ago the problem of striking raised trainstops at speed led to the failure of a number of devices based on the method. The NER persisted, but only by using a ramp a bit like the GWR ramp to give some of the indications on their Fog Signalling Apparatus. Since then metallurgy has progressed, but there is only so much that can be done about fatigue. Striking a trainstop occasionally at high speed is very different to striking them regularly at high speed. One of the reasons there are tripcock testers is to ensure that the arm has not broken off. -- David Hansen, Edinburgh | PGP email preferred-key number F566DA0E I will always explain revoked keys, unless the UK government prevents me by using the RIP Act 2000. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Hansen wrote:
snip Striking a trainstop occasionally at high speed is very different to striking them regularly at high speed. One of the reasons there are tripcock testers is to ensure that the arm has not broken off. I'd put that differently. The tripcock tester is there to ensure that 1) the train has a tripcock set and 2) that the tripcock is to gauge. -- Cheers for now, John from Harrow, Middx remove spamnocars to reply |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Do people have to have the last word on EVERYTHING in here?
He said ONE of the reasons the tripcock tester is there is to ensure that the arm has not broken off. ONE of the reasons. Not ALL of the reasons! No need to try and correct everything that is posted on here. Credit people with a little intellegence, please! |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Minna Daisuki Katamari Damacy" wrote in message ups.com... SNIP! As for the maximum speed limit on the LUL, well, there is a very grey area at Amersham. There is a 70mph speed limit sign between Amersham station and the Network Rail boundry, beyond the electrified track. Now im told that the maximum speed anywhere on the LUL is 60mph. Ive never seen this written down, but ive been told many times by many different people that it is. But this 70mph sign exists. Can trains do 70mph there, or is this 60mph limit real? I for one keep on acclerating past 60mph. If you are lucky enough to actually get a unit capable of getting above 60 before Mantles Wood! Having to clear the 15mph "ESR" doesn't make it any easier either. Roger http://rpm-railpics.fotopic.net/ http://therailwaystationgallery.fotopic.net/ http://therailticketgallery.fotopic.net/ All opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of my employer. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
True. But its always good to try! ;o)
I usually manage to be able to creep over the 70mph barrier just as the radio goes back to area 88. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|