Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:15:26 UTC, Tony Polson wrote:
: "Ian Johnston" wrote: : : I wonder about suspension bridges. I suspect the wires are just too : much an area of concentrated strength, and would probably cheesecutter : the wings off. It would still be a heck of a mess, of course. : : The deck at mid-span is a vulnerable point. More than elsewhere? After all, if it's a theoretical suspension bridge - uniform loading across span, parabolic cables - it should be possible to slice across the deck as often as you like. Still, I suppose it's a place where deck and cables are conveniently grouped as a target. : Or fly through the : suspension hangers, which support the deck from the suspension cables. : You would only need to sever a (relatively) small number to result in : the surrounding hangers failing through being over-stressed. That certainly sounds a possibility. Mind you, some suspension bridges are very tough - I was amazed that they managed to repair the foorbridge over the Ness in Inverness on which one of the suspension cables broke. Looked like a hell of a mess, half collapsed into the river. However - isn't this a gruesome discussion? - I suspect there just wouldn't be the casualty figures these people require. Heavily populated / occupied areas will always be more attractive. Ian -- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
LONDON BOMBS COVER-UP: BOMBS WERE UNDER TRAINS | London Transport | |||
LONDON BOMBS COVER-UP: BOMBS WERE UNDER TRAINS | London Transport | |||
More bombs?? | London Transport | |||
More bombs?? | London Transport | |||
2 is more likely (was London bombs - the work of ONE man?) | London Transport |