LONDON BOMBS COVER-UP: BOMBS WERE UNDER TRAINS

"The policeman said 'mind that hole, that's where the bomb was'. The
metal was pushed upwards as if the bomb was underneath the train. They
seem to think the bomb was left in a bag, but I don't remember anybody
being where the bomb was, or any bag," he said.

Cambridge Evening News, "I was in tube bomb carriage - and survived",
11 July 2005.
http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/news...79a86926f9.lpf

This is an eye-witness testimony and other eye-witnesses say the same
things. So how come the security services and the mass-media are
ignoring them and spreading the lie that the bombs were in the
carriages? Blast damage pushes material away from the location of the
explosive.

There is no way the bombs could have been in the carriages. There is no
way terrorists could have gained access to the tracks or the underneath
of the trains. So who put the bombs under the trains and why are we
being lied to about it?

It is interesting that there was also a copy-cat attack - which was
almost exactly the same as the first, except for two details: nobody
was killed. This strange attack conveniently reminds us all that
terrorist bombs go inside carriages, not underneath them. And somehow
every single would-be terrorist escaped the crowds of angry londonners,
the police, the extra security and the ticket barriers and inspectors
that surrounded them.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4713651.stm

Do not worry though. Government, the military and the intelligence
community will be granted extra powers and funding to protect us. Pay
rises and promotions all round. In fact, Mossad, the CIA, MI5, etc.,
stand to gain very much indeed from these attacks.

Predictably, though, Islam and particularly radical Islam will suffer.
How foolish. How confusing. how mysterious.

How suspicious.

Terrorism London wrote:
LONDON BOMBS COVER-UP: BOMBS WERE UNDER TRAINS

"The policeman said 'mind that hole, that's where the bomb was'. The
metal was pushed upwards as if the bomb was underneath the train.
They seem to think the bomb was left in a bag, but I don't remember
anybody being where the bomb was, or any bag," he said.

Typical of a conspiracy theorist that you base your entire theory on
what a shocked, injured witness does or doesn't remember.

FU set
--
Richard J.
(to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address)

Terrorism London wrote:
LONDON BOMBS COVER-UP: BOMBS WERE UNDER TRAINS



Predictably, though, Islam and particularly radical Islam will suffer.
How foolish. How confusing. how mysterious.

How suspicious.

How stupid.

On 25 Jul 2005 03:40:08 -0700, "Terrorism London"
wrote:

LONDON BOMBS COVER-UP: BOMBS WERE UNDER TRAINS

"The policeman said 'mind that hole, that's where the bomb was'. The
metal was pushed upwards as if the bomb was underneath the train. They
seem to think the bomb was left in a bag, but I don't remember anybody
being where the bomb was, or any bag," he said.
[snip]


How is life with BT Openworld? Why don't you post your name Mr
Theorist?

Rob.
--
rob at robertwoolley dot co dot uk

BOMBS WERE UNDER TRAINS

No they weren't...