Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roger T." wrote:
The fact that the building did not collapse on impact is neither here nor there other than it gave those fortunate enough to be under the point of impact more time to escape. Those above the impact were doomed the moment the planes hit. Doomed? ... except for the fact that so many of them escaped. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:14:22 UTC, Tony Polson wrote:
: "Roger T." wrote: : The fact that the building did not collapse on impact is neither here nor : there other than it gave those fortunate enough to be under the point of : impact more time to escape. Those above the impact were doomed the moment : the planes hit. : Doomed? ... except for the fact that so many of them escaped. I though the statistics were that nobody from the floors of impact or above survived? However it is remarkable, and a tribute to the design, that so many from below the impacts survived. Ian |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ian Johnston" wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:14:22 UTC, Tony Polson wrote: : "Roger T." wrote: : The fact that the building did not collapse on impact is neither here nor : there other than it gave those fortunate enough to be under the point of : impact more time to escape. Those above the impact were doomed the moment : the planes hit. : Doomed? ... except for the fact that so many of them escaped. I though the statistics were that nobody from the floors of impact or above survived? I read reports of people being evacuated down stairwells past the floors affected by impact until the fireproofing no longer worked. How many escaped that way, I don't know. However it is remarkable, and a tribute to the design, that so many from below the impacts survived. Agreed. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tony Polson" The fact that the building did not collapse on impact is neither here nor there other than it gave those fortunate enough to be under the point of impact more time to escape. Those above the impact were doomed the moment the planes hit. Doomed? ... except for the fact that so many of them escaped. AFAIK, Only half a dozen people, in one tower, who were above the point of impact got out. -- Cheers Roger T. Home of the Great Eastern Railway http://www.highspeedplus.com/~rogertra/ |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:50:18 -0700, "Roger T."
wrote: AFAIK, Only half a dozen people, in one tower, who were above the point of impact got out. The two planes hit at very different angles. In one tower, all stairways were severed, while those in the other were more lucky (or less unlucky). I have no idea of figures, however. Neil -- Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK When replying please use neil at the above domain 'wensleydale' is a spam trap and is not read. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
LONDON BOMBS COVER-UP: BOMBS WERE UNDER TRAINS | London Transport | |||
LONDON BOMBS COVER-UP: BOMBS WERE UNDER TRAINS | London Transport | |||
More bombs?? | London Transport | |||
More bombs?? | London Transport | |||
2 is more likely (was London bombs - the work of ONE man?) | London Transport |