Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Whilst doing volunteer work for LU at Hammersmith station, the DM came
down and showed us his pager, which showed that due to an Incident with a passenger, Armed Police had to visit the station, causing the District to be suspended Tower Hill - Plaistow and the Central to be suspended as well (Later on changed to all trains running but not stopping at Mile End). ANyone know what went on? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joe wrote:
Whilst doing volunteer work for LU at Hammersmith station, the DM came down and showed us his pager, which showed that due to an Incident with a passenger, Armed Police had to visit the station, causing the District to be suspended Tower Hill - Plaistow and the Central to be suspended as well (Later on changed to all trains running but not stopping at Mile End). ANyone know what went on? According to the BBC: 1115: Police respond to a security alert at Mile End station, where one eyewitness reports a smell of burning. 1130: Mile End station is reopened as Scotland Yard explain the incident was "nothing". By the way, what sort of volunteer work are you doing for LU? Is this their response to Bob Crow's demand for more staff on stations? -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Richard J." wrote in message
. uk... Joe wrote: Whilst doing volunteer work for LU at Hammersmith station, the DM came down and showed us his pager, which showed that due to an Incident with a passenger, Armed Police had to visit the station, causing the District to be suspended Tower Hill - Plaistow and the Central to be suspended as well (Later on changed to all trains running but not stopping at Mile End). ANyone know what went on? According to the BBC: 1115: Police respond to a security alert at Mile End station, where one eyewitness reports a smell of burning. 1130: Mile End station is reopened as Scotland Yard explain the incident was "nothing". I'm intrigued at the vague description of the incident being "nothing". If there was a smell of burning, there was a cause. I wonder why Scotland Yard or London Transport didn't say what the cause actually was. Am I right to be suspicious of vagueness like this? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
By the way, what sort of volunteer work are you doing for LU? Is this
their response to Bob Crow's demand for more staff on stations? You might have seen the posters around the tube with bullet points on them. One of those is "additonal staff volunteers." My Mum works in the TfL offices at 55 Broadway and they sent an eMail round a few weeks back asking if anyone could put their name onto a list to provide help where needed, so she put her name on it and I just turn up with her. Last week we were outside Kings X, handing out service updates and giving information on alternative journeys, today we were on the platforms at Hammersmith giving out information, most of the people seemed to be people changing to the District. One thing that shocked me though was the DM said "Outside of the peak we don't normally have anyone on the platforms, even recently," indeed when we went for lunch and after we left, there was nobody else on the platforms (the DM only came down for a short while). This quite surprises me, because there are people changing here all year round coming from Heathrow, and in light of line closures it is quite important to make that first impression and provide good journey information, the number of people I spoke to who were not English would have had any idea how to get to their destination. In fact, there was one woman who was struggling with Luggage, couldnt speak English and needed to get to Sheperds Bush H&C, and the only way to get her to the bus, would be to go with her, something the gate staff are willing to want to/be able to do. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 17:10:21 GMT, "Richard J."
wrote: By the way, what sort of volunteer work are you doing for LU? Is this their response to Bob Crow's demand for more staff on stations? There is now an almost standard procedure that when there is any sort of serious incident that disrupts the service that all LU employees are requested to volunteer. The purpose is to provide additional support to front line staff to keep the service running (train radio failures) or help direct people to alternative tube, bus or rail services. Most of the present requirement is to act to offer reassurance to people using the system that there are staff around the system as well as travel information. I have yet to see Bob Crow's name within a thousand miles of these requests. My guess is that he would view any volunteer as taking work away from his current membership. Take a look at what the RMT's demands are - they are designed to do one thing and that is increase union membership and thus his ability to control / stop the railway. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 20:03:14 +0100, Paul Corfield
wrote: On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 17:10:21 GMT, "Richard J." wrote: By the way, what sort of volunteer work are you doing for LU? Is this their response to Bob Crow's demand for more staff on stations? There is now an almost standard procedure that when there is any sort of serious incident that disrupts the service that all LU employees are requested to volunteer. The purpose is to provide additional support to front line staff to keep the service running (train radio failures) or help direct people to alternative tube, bus or rail services. Most of the present requirement is to act to offer reassurance to people using the system that there are staff around the system as well as travel information. I have yet to see Bob Crow's name within a thousand miles of these requests. My guess is that he would view any volunteer as taking work away from his current membership. Take a look at what the RMT's demands are - they are designed to do one thing and that is increase union membership and thus his ability to control / stop the railway. Yep the RMT want: * guards on trains * more staff on the gatelines. It can only be a short time before they want additional payment... Rob. -- rob at robertwoolley dot co dot uk |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 21:13:16 +0100, Robert Woolley
wrote: Yep the RMT want: * guards on trains * more staff on the gatelines. It can only be a short time before they want additional payment... I think it's fair to say that they currently want additional payment. It probably won't be long before they disrupt our lives by striking, though, I'm sure. (Which is, I guess, what you meant ![]() -- James Farrar September's coming soon |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This was an unfortunate combination of a report of one of the bomb
suspects being on a WB Central Line train and a motor flashover with caused smoke to emit from the rear car at the same time. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Corfield" wrote in message: Take a look at what the RMT's demands are - they are designed to do one thing and that is increase union membership and thus his ability to control / stop the railway. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! Nice to see Broadways interpretation of the request for more staff!!! The volunteers didn't last long..... I'm no union fan but this talk like this will only end in tears........ As for staff on the platforms, on my line we always place people on the platform during disruption, they serve 2 purposes, the first is to detrain quickly and get the next one in so people aren't in the tunnel long, the second is to provide info. This is common policy on all lines. Off peak, all platforms are visited on a set pattern by staff. And yes Paul...we are both on the same side..... Mal |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:59:18 GMT, "Malcolm Pinnell"
wrote: "Paul Corfield" wrote in message: Take a look at what the RMT's demands are - they are designed to do one thing and that is increase union membership and thus his ability to control / stop the railway. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! Nice to see Broadways interpretation of the request for more staff!!! The volunteers didn't last long..... I'm no union fan but this talk like this will only end in tears........ One comment - *my* interpretation. Nothing whatsoever to do with 55 Broadway or any other location on the railway. I speak for myself not for anyone else or as any official mouthpiece. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mayor sets out plan for 22-mile ring-road tunnel under London | London Transport | |||
Rail subsidy per mile | London Transport | |||
FOI - LU report into Mile End passengers struck incident | London Transport | |||
BBC news Central line Mile End derailment | London Transport | |||
LU end-to-end journey data | London Transport |