Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Stephen Farrow" wrote in message
Alan (in Brussels) wrote: "Nigel Pendse" a écrit dans le message de ... "Ian Jelf" wrote in message In message , Tom Anderson writes Conversely, London never had the el-to-subway transition that built a lot of the NYC system (there are one or two examples of this happening in London, though). I'll probably kick myself when you answer this.......but where are there any examples of this happening in London? How about where the District and Picc climb out of their subsurface and deep level tunnels at Earl's Court to just below ground level at Hammersmith and then up a steep gradient on to the viaduct by Ravenscourt Park? Or where the Wimbledon Line climbs on to a quite high viaduct in Fulham? And the Central west of White City? In each of these cases, we have an Underground line climbing from a tunnel to viaduct level, and staying at viaduct level for at least a few stations. Yes and no, because although those are indeed examples of what the OP of the text meant, what he actually wrote (as he clarified subsequently) referred to the construction of tunnels *to replace* surface or elevated lines. The only cases I can think of are on the Central Line between Stratford and Leyton, a short length of the NLR North Woolwich branch and the Kingsway tram tunnel (at least partly). In London, unlike NYC, there are several examples of the opposite situation, eg parts of the DLR (Sivertown tramway) where new elevated sections replace surface lines formerly serving the docks... Also on the DLR, the previously elevated Island Gardens was replaced by an underground station when the line was extended across the Thames to Greenwich and Lewisham (Mudchute, also, was originally an elevated station, and was rebuilt, though it is not now underground - it's just north of the tunnel portal). I know it's not exactly the same, but the replacement of High Holborn by Thameslink means that commuter trains now tunnel under Ludgate Hill rather than crossing over it (and obscuring the view of St Paul's in the process). Of course, the Snow Hill tunnel had been there all along, but had been abandoned for decades before being brought back into service again. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The next doomed Stansted NYC business jet | London Transport | |||
City Hall NYC - stunning photos | London Transport | |||
City Hall NYC - stunning photos | London Transport | |||
Piccadilly Line 7/7 Comparisons | London Transport | |||
London - Kiev comparisons | London Transport |