![]() |
deepest escalator on the underground?
Hi,
As subject line read just wondeirng what the deepest escalotor is on the tube. cheers |
deepest escalator on the underground?
"mocha" wrote in message
... Hi, As subject line read just wondeirng what the deepest escalotor is on the tube. Depends how you define "deepest escalator". Do you mean: - height of longest escalator - deepest top of escalator below ground level - deepest bottom of escalator below ground level According to "The London Underground", Oliver Green, Ian Allan, ISBN 0-7110-1720-4, the longest escalator is at Leicester Square on the Piccadilly Line: 161 ft 6 in (49.6 m) on slope or 80 ft 9 in (24.6 m) vertical rise. |
deepest escalator on the underground?
"Martin Underwood" wrote in message ... According to "The London Underground", Oliver Green, Ian Allan, ISBN 0-7110-1720-4, the longest escalator is at Leicester Square on the Piccadilly Line: 161 ft 6 in (49.6 m) on slope or 80 ft 9 in (24.6 m) vertical rise. must be an old book then coz Angel on the Northern Line is 318 steps and 90 feet |
deepest escalator on the underground?
In article ,
"Martin Underwood" wrote: "mocha" wrote in message ... Hi, As subject line read just wondeirng what the deepest escalotor is on the tube. Depends how you define "deepest escalator". Do you mean: - height of longest escalator - deepest top of escalator below ground level - deepest bottom of escalator below ground level According to "The London Underground", Oliver Green, Ian Allan, ISBN 0-7110-1720-4, the longest escalator is at Leicester Square on the Piccadilly Line: 161 ft 6 in (49.6 m) on slope or 80 ft 9 in (24.6 m) vertical rise. I thought the longest was at Angel. The deepest tube station is Hampstead but this has a lift and not an escalator. -- http://www.election.demon.co.uk "We can also agree that Saddam Hussein most certainly has chemical and biolog- ical weapons and is working towards a nuclear capability. The dossier contains confirmation of information that we either knew or most certainly should have been willing to assume." - Menzies Campbell, 24th September 2002. |
deepest escalator on the underground?
"Martin Underwood" wrote in message ... "mocha" wrote in message ... Hi, As subject line read just wondeirng what the deepest escalotor is on the tube. Depends how you define "deepest escalator". Do you mean: - height of longest escalator - deepest top of escalator below ground level - deepest bottom of escalator below ground level According to "The London Underground", Oliver Green, Ian Allan, ISBN 0-7110-1720-4, the longest escalator is at Leicester Square on the Piccadilly Line: 161 ft 6 in (49.6 m) on slope or 80 ft 9 in (24.6 m) vertical rise. Thanks for the reply What is the deepest platform below ground level? I guess al 3 woul dbe an interesting piece of information to know. The height of the longest escalator would be interesting too. Cheers |
deepest escalator on the underground?
"mocha" wrote in message ... Thanks for the reply What is the deepest platform below ground level? I guess al 3 woul dbe an interesting piece of information to know. The height of the longest escalator would be interesting too. Cheers http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tube/company/facts.asp Incdentally, you can find the answers to all such facts extremely easily, just with a simple Google search. |
deepest escalator on the underground?
"PJR" wrote in message
... "Martin Underwood" wrote in message ... According to "The London Underground", Oliver Green, Ian Allan, ISBN 0-7110-1720-4, the longest escalator is at Leicester Square on the Piccadilly Line: 161 ft 6 in (49.6 m) on slope or 80 ft 9 in (24.6 m) vertical rise. must be an old book then coz Angel on the Northern Line is 318 steps and 90 feet Yes, it was published in 1987. I looked to see if I had a more recent book that gave more up-to-date information, but I hadn't. I hadn't realised that Angel had taken the record away from Leicester Square. I know that Angel was remodelled fairly extensively to replace the very narrow two-faced island platform. Were two separate escalators combined into one or was the booking office moved further away, requiring a longer/higher escalator? |
deepest escalator on the underground?
Martin Underwood said:
I know that Angel was remodelled fairly extensively to replace the very narrow two-faced island platform. Were two separate escalators combined into one or was the booking office moved further away, requiring a longer/higher escalator? I believe the booking office was moved. -- |
deepest escalator on the underground?
Martin Underwood:
I know that Angel was remodelled fairly extensively to replace the very narrow two-faced island platform. Were two separate escalators combined into one or was the booking office moved further away, requiring a longer/higher escalator? Pippa Moran: I believe the booking office was moved. Yes. And there was a lift before, not an escalator. -- Mark Brader, Toronto "More importantly, Mark is just plain wrong." -- John Hollingsworth |
deepest escalator on the underground?
|
deepest escalator on the underground?
In message , at
21:33:28 on Mon, 19 Sep 2005, mocha remarked: What is the deepest platform below ground level? Hampstead. Because the ground there is very high. The general topic of "deepest below sea level" was also debated about a month ago. I'm not sure we came to a definite conclusion, but it could be Westminster-Jubilee, or if you count the DLR, perhaps Cutty Sark. It's definitely not Waterloo, although the deepest *line* (below sea level) is near there. -- Roland Perry |
deepest escalator on the underground?
In message , at
23:04:15 on Mon, 19 Sep 2005, PJR remarked: Incdentally, you can find the answers to all such facts extremely easily, just with a simple Google search. If you can find the deepest platform below sea level I'll be very impressed (not counting our discussion here last month). -- Roland Perry |
deepest escalator on the underground?
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, mocha wrote:
What is the deepest platform below ground level? I guess all 3 would be an interesting piece of information to know. The height of the longest escalator would be interesting too. Then you may be interested in Clive's comprehensive treatment of the subject: http://www.davros.org/rail/culg/vertical.html http://www.davros.org/rail/culg/vdetails.html tom -- Science runs with us, making us Gods. |
deepest escalator on the underground?
"Roland Perry" wrote in message
.uk... In message , at 06:37:43 on Tue, 20 Sep 2005, remarked: I know that Angel was remodelled fairly extensively to replace the very narrow two-faced island platform. Were two separate escalators combined into one or was the booking office moved further away, requiring a longer/higher escalator? I believe the booking office was moved. The booking office moved round the corner, but didn't substantially go "up" or "down". The remodelling replaced a lift with escalators. One very long one and one shorter one. http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/ltangel.gif -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
deepest escalator on the underground?
"Mark Brader" wrote in message ... Yes. And there was a lift before, not an escalator. -- Isn't the replacement of lifts with escalators the reasoning behind some of the central area station closures; ie when the surface buidings were no longer directly above the stations, their entrances were so close both stations were no longer justified. Paul Scott |
deepest escalator on the underground?
In message , at
13:01:35 on Wed, 21 Sep 2005, Paul Scott remarked: Isn't the replacement of lifts with escalators the reasoning behind some of the central area station closures; ie when the surface buidings were no longer directly above the stations, their entrances were so close both stations were no longer justified. That's often quoted for Down St/Green Park. Haven't heard it for any others though. -- Roland Perry |
deepest escalator on the underground?
"Roland Perry" wrote in message
.uk... In message , at 23:04:15 on Mon, 19 Sep 2005, PJR remarked: Incdentally, you can find the answers to all such facts extremely easily, just with a simple Google search. If you can find the deepest platform below sea level I'll be very impressed (not counting our discussion here last month). -- Roland Perry The answer was in the link on the post that you replied to, kind of proving my point .... |
deepest escalator on the underground?
In message , at
19:15:36 on Wed, 21 Sep 2005, PJR remarked: If you can find the deepest platform below sea level I'll be very impressed (not counting our discussion here last month). The answer was in the link on the post that you replied to, kind of proving my point .... That's very odd. As recently as last month when this discussion was last held, the deepest point (below sea level) was quoted as being on the northern line a little south of Waterloo; I wonder why the tfl site never got quoted (rather than several others). The figure of 105ft below sea level is a little suspect, as the published drop for their lifts is 100ft, and ground level is about 35ft above sea level. Oh well. -- Roland Perry |
deepest escalator on the underground?
"Roland Perry" wrote in message
.uk... In message , at 19:15:36 on Wed, 21 Sep 2005, PJR remarked: If you can find the deepest platform below sea level I'll be very impressed (not counting our discussion here last month). The answer was in the link on the post that you replied to, kind of proving my point .... That's very odd. As recently as last month when this discussion was last held, the deepest point (below sea level) was quoted as being on the northern line a little south of Waterloo; I wonder why the tfl site never got quoted (rather than several others). The tfl site was indeed quoted. See my posting of 8:39 pm on Aug 24th: http://groups.google.com/group/uk.ra...1c1612e999fa11 -- David Biddulph |
deepest escalator on the underground?
In message , at
20:30:31 on Wed, 21 Sep 2005, David Biddulph remarked: "Roland Perry" wrote in message o.uk... In message , at 19:15:36 on Wed, 21 Sep 2005, PJR remarked: If you can find the deepest platform below sea level I'll be very impressed (not counting our discussion here last month). The answer was in the link on the post that you replied to, kind of proving my point .... That's very odd. As recently as last month when this discussion was last held, the deepest point (below sea level) was quoted as being on the northern line a little south of Waterloo; I wonder why the tfl site never got quoted (rather than several others). The tfl site was indeed quoted. See my posting of 8:39 pm on Aug 24th: http://groups.google.com/group/uk.ra...ad/604b84a8678 5acef/fd1c1612e999fa11?q=deepest&rnum=1#fd1c1612e999fa11 What I can't work out is how you managed to post: From http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tube/company/facts.asp: Bank (DLR concourse): 41.4m (136ft) below street level. I thought that the street there might be between 10 and 20m above sea level, but I don't have a detailed map of that area, and followed by the now outdated, and contradicted by tfl's site: http://www.trainweb.org/tubeprune/Statistics.htm confirms the statement above, that the deepest below sea level is Waterloo (Northern) at 21.3m All in one paragraph! It was exactly a result of this that made me think the tfl site didn't quote Westminster as the deepest platform, because it's clearly deeper than Waterloo, and yet you didn't mention this! -- Roland Perry |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:27 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk