Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Blue Watch relive the bomb hell inside carriage 346A
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_ne...588239,00.html Does any one know the other car numbers on this 7/7 Piccadilly Line train? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message .com,
spotter writes Blue Watch relive the bomb hell inside carriage 346A http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_ne...588239,00.html Does any one know the other car numbers on this 7/7 Piccadilly Line train? As the affected cars were 166 (DM) and 566 (T) I'm not quite sure where the 346A comes from. I think the train number was something like 316 (not too sure now, but I did at the time) so it couldn't have been that either. But then, when did the papers let facts get in the way of a good story? -- Steve Fitzgerald has now left the building. You will find him in London's Docklands, E16, UK (please use the reply to address for email) |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Steve Fitzgerald wrote: In message .com, spotter writes Blue Watch relive the bomb hell inside carriage 346A http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_ne...588239,00.html Does any one know the other car numbers on this 7/7 Piccadilly Line train? As the affected cars were 166 (DM) and 566 (T) I'm not quite sure where the 346A comes from. I think the train number was something like 316 (not too sure now, but I did at the time) so it couldn't have been that either. Was it possibly a Fire Service designation? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well yes the papers get it wrong. Somebody was pulling the reporter's
leg maybe. The train was first identified as 311, then over the weekend this was changed to 331. A very knowledgeable person told me that 346A is a nonsense, 346 would be a D car either the third or the fourth carriage. As far as I can gather train 331 was made up as follows: 166-566-366-417-617-217 with 166 in front. Does 346 belong to train 311? We would then have 146-546-346 as a half-train. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message .com,
spotter writes Well yes the papers get it wrong. Somebody was pulling the reporter's leg maybe. The train was first identified as 311, then over the weekend this was changed to 331. A very knowledgeable person told me that 346A is a nonsense, 346 would be a D car either the third or the fourth carriage. As far as I can gather train 331 was made up as follows: 166-566-366-417-617-217 with 166 in front. 346 would indeed have (still has!) leading car 146. I suppose 166 could have easily been confused with 146 in the melee. And it is an 'A' end unit. Does 346 belong to train 311? We would then have 146-546-346 as a half-train. As the trains are allocated their 'running numbers' on the day, and frequently have to be reformed throughout the day for service requirements anyway, it's unlikely anyone would know now if 146 was in the consist of 311 on that day. 331 is booked to go westbound through Kings X at 0829. Bearing in mind that we'd just had a big shutdown that morning at Holloway Road (I think it was), then the train would be running late, which I gather it was. So that sounds about the right one. As it was all going on well behind me (I was stuck in Eastcote eastbound platform when it kicked off) the details are starting to get a bit hazy now. -- Steve Fitzgerald has now left the building. You will find him in London's Docklands, E16, UK (please use the reply to address for email) |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
spotter wrote: Does 346 belong to train 311? This question is like "does [car #] 346 belong to the 8:36 from Epping?" in that "train 311" is an timetable ID. Different physical trains [1] make up that service on different days. [1] Lets skip some of the detail here. -- RIP Morph (1977-2005) |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brimstone, Steve, Mike
Thanks for the replies and information. Yes, I understand that a train number is more like a service number and that a six car set can even change its number during the day due to cancellations. Does the working timetable say whether 311 is booked westbound through King's Cross around 0830? |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve, Brimstone, Mike
Thanks for the replies and information. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does the working timetable say whether 311 is booked westbound through
King's Cross around 0830? It says: 0641 to Uxbridge and 1015 to Heathrow, but as I said earlier 331 was booked through at that time. -- Steve Fitzgerald has now left the building. You will find him in London's Docklands, E16, UK (please use the reply to address for email) |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does the working timetable say whether 311 is booked westbound through
King's Cross around 0830? It says: 0641 to Uxbridge and 1015 to Heathrow, but as I said earlier 331 was booked through at that time. -- It takes 80 minutes minimum to get to Uxbridge from Cockfosters, another 45 minutes minimum to get back to King's Cross. At around 0850 - 0900 it is scheduled to be heading eastbound through King's Cross? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A Car Is Ready For You - Used Car Auto Loans | London Transport | |||
Electric or Hybrid Card or something car, suggestions? | London Transport | |||
Richmond Station Car Park on a Sunday | London Transport | |||
car rental | London Transport | |||
Big car owners face tax hike | London Transport |