Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Martin Underwood wrote: wrote in : Martin Underwood wrote: I didn't know that new lines were not built with a rising gradient on the approach to each station and a falling gradient on the departure from it. I'd have thought that the reasons for which the humps were originally built (helping slowing down on arrival, speeding up and reducing current consumption on departure) would be as valid today as they were 150 years ago. I think it was an innovation on the Central London Railway wasn't it, with the earliest lines not having it? None of them quite 150 years ago anyway. Maybe 105. Ah, so it's only a feature of the tube lines and not the cut-and-cover lines? I didn't know that. In that case, my approximate figure of 150 years (actually 143 years if you take the first Underground line as being built in 1863) changes to 105 years (Central line built in 1900), as you say. Apparently, from the other message, it was used on the C&SLR, which would make it 115 or so. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tube Lines construction at Stratford | London Transport | |||
Live lines on tube track? | London Transport | |||
More Tube lines now have live ETA boards | London Transport | |||
Street Map showing tube lines? | London Transport | |||
tube lines south of the river | London Transport |