London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #51   Report Post  
Old January 12th 06, 08:46 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Apr 2005
Posts: 349
Default The real reasons behind the strike?

"Most staff (the 4000) who were balloted walked out of their own free
will
because they know that the company is after shafting them."

Well doesn't that say it all?!

As originally stated, this is a "dispute" because some RMT members
regard themselves as being "shafted" - a far way from being a dispute
about "safety" at all! Frankly, as to whether the RMT or other strikers
are "shafted" or not is a matter of supreme indifference to me and the
majoirity of the long-suffering travelling public, who are themselves
"shafted" every time Crow or Law feel like having a long week-end away
from work.

Marc.


  #52   Report Post  
Old January 12th 06, 09:40 PM posted to uk.transport.london
Mal Mal is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2005
Posts: 40
Default The real reasons behind the strike?


"RedAspect" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
"Do any of the doubters and knockers on this NG really believe that
4000 tube
workers would lose two days pay if there weren't real issues here"

Oh, 4,000 staff went on strike did they?

If that number went on strike and most of the system remained open,
clearly there is gross overstaffing anyway.


"democratic, legal strike"

Indeed, which is presumably why many exercised their democratic right
to carry on working.

Marc.

A few scabs, ASLEF drivers who weren't balloted, TSSA members who live of
the backs of the RMT and some RMT drivers who weren't in the dipute. The
rest were unqualified and unlicensed office staff and managers.

Afew scabs????? Your definition of people who went to work is quite
offensive. Oh...and out dated. Democracy only works for you does it?
ASLEF drivers weren't balloted as you say so its obvious they will be at
work - get over it.
TSSA members don't live of RMTs back.....they weren't ballotted so obviously
they would be at work. Interesting that TSSA sent out a large pack for
members to read with ALL the facts before deciding. Jelousy does terrible
things to people doesn't it.
Unqualified and unlicensed managers???? Get real.....most stations opened
because RMT members came to work. Accept it.
Where did you get the 4000 who didnt come in?
They only loose 1 days pay. RMT set it so that is the way it works. If you
think they lost 2 what chance have you got for the rest of your so called
facts.
From what i see 40 groups have accepted it, 4 haven't. If you want to speak
aboutr democracy, what about that then?
Sorry if this offends anyone but sometimes........
Mal


  #53   Report Post  
Old January 12th 06, 11:06 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Apr 2005
Posts: 349
Default The real reasons behind the strike?

Good for you Mal!

Marc.

  #54   Report Post  
Old January 12th 06, 11:53 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jan 2006
Posts: 14
Default The real reasons behind the strike?


wrote in message
ups.com...
Good for you Mal!

Marc.



To and anyone that agrees with him.
NYE and 9 Jan is two days! I ddn't say ASLEF, TSSA and RMT drivers were
scabs. You can't count and your command of English is a bit suspect too.




Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
  #55   Report Post  
Old January 13th 06, 12:08 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2003
Posts: 316
Default The real reasons behind the strike?

On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:32:43 -0000, "RedAspect"
wrote:


wrote in message
roups.com...
"Do any of the doubters and knockers on this NG really believe that
4000 tube
workers would lose two days pay if there weren't real issues here"

Oh, 4,000 staff went on strike did they?

If that number went on strike and most of the system remained open,
clearly there is gross overstaffing anyway.


"democratic, legal strike"

Indeed, which is presumably why many exercised their democratic right
to carry on working.

Marc.

A few scabs, ASLEF drivers who weren't balloted, TSSA members who live of
the backs of the RMT and some RMT drivers who weren't in the dipute. The
rest were unqualified and unlicensed office staff and managers.

Most staff (the 4000) who were balloted walked out of their own free will
because they know that the company is after shafting them.


Would that be the 1,568 who actually took part in the ballot, or the
2400 who didn't?

--
Nick Cooper

[Carefully remove the detonators from my e-mail address to reply!]

The London Underground at War, and in Films & TV:
http://www.nickcooper.org.uk/


  #56   Report Post  
Old January 13th 06, 07:44 AM posted to uk.transport.london
Mal Mal is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2005
Posts: 40
Default The real reasons behind the strike?


"RedAspect" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ups.com...
Good for you Mal!

Marc.



To and anyone that agrees with him.
NYE and 9 Jan is two days! I ddn't say ASLEF, TSSA and RMT drivers were
scabs. You can't count and your command of English is a bit suspect too.


Sorry about the bad English......I was a bit tired. However I think that
comment reflects exactly how despearate you are......... If you can't win an
argument with truth, resort to a personal attack. But i guess i saw that
from your 'scabs'comment.
The 2 days is correct.....It was so inefective i forgot you had 2 days off.
I can't resist pointing out the first line of your response.......
Sometimes you just have to accept you can't win a fight, move on, look at
another issue and admit defeat like proffessionals.

Mal




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Please stand behind the line as the train approaches and let passengers off before boarding [email protected] London Transport 5 June 29th 11 10:41 AM
LU strike and possible knock-on effects on NR / LO services [was:Tube strike] Mizter T London Transport 39 June 15th 09 11:34 AM
The BNP ate my Gerbil: Behind the Smears - The real British NationalParty [email protected] London Transport 5 March 19th 09 11:53 PM
Reasons for delays Chris London Transport 41 December 13th 04 11:11 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017