London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8   Report Post  
Old January 10th 06, 12:37 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2005
Posts: 130
Default Question about tube strikes

Paul Corfield wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jan 2006 15:37:48 GMT, "d" wrote:


"Chris!" wrote in message
groups.com...

Poldie wrote:

Is there any reason why the staff don't work as usual while striking
but just refuse to take money for tickets?

Because then there would be no point in striking during NYE or England
football matches


Of course there would be - the company takes a massive dive because it's
running a full service, and not getting any money for it. Them striking on
NYE demonstrates my point exactly.



There were no fares charged for much of New Year's Eve night so it is
irrelevant in that specific example. The reason for the dates is that
they were both expected to inflict maximum reputational damage on LUL
thus forcing management to the table. There were news articles about
the NYE dispute on Hong Kong and Asian television channels for goodness
sake. The strike threat therefore got a worldwide audience. Today's
strike date was cynically chosen to coincide with the expected full
scale return to work post Christmas. Hence also why it was timed to
wreck both peak periods. There is no subtlety here.

The RMT's strategy has always been to get public sympathy and concern on
their side - hence the "safety" argument this time round and the attempt
to move the goal posts to "safety" to widen the dispute. My personal
view is that the public are fed up with the antics of the tube unions.
The unions are on the verge of squandering the positive view that most
of the public have of transport workers post 7/7. That would be an
immensely silly thing to do.


The unions have beef with management, yet they take it out on the public.
The public are then expected to kick up a stink and get management acting in
the way the unions want. Why don't they cut out the middle man and stick it
to the management straight away? It seems absolutely ridiculous for unions
to penalise the public for the management's decisions.



Unions have always withdrawn their labour - it is, after all, the
resource they claim to represent. Therefore they are not very good at
learning new tricks. "All out brothers!"


I'm a left-leaning individual, and even I can see those asshats at london
underground (Mr Crow I'm looking at you, you fat pie-eating redneck) are
looking out for themselves with no consideration for the public (which, for
a public transport company, is not a great idea).



Do you seriously expect any consideration of the public by the RMT?
They only represent their members.

THey only represent SOME of their members, they're not interested in
drivers unless it's to use them as a lever to get what they want.
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tube driver wins claim for unfair dismissal - strikes off? Mizter T London Transport 17 June 25th 11 09:35 AM
Next week's Tube strikes (last week of June) are off Mizter T London Transport 0 June 24th 11 03:45 PM
No Tube Strikes In January - RMT Paul London Transport 1 January 11th 11 10:49 AM
Weekly Tube Strikes Threatened Paul London Transport 20 August 26th 10 02:40 PM
World Cup tube strikes Basil Jet[_2_] London Transport 4 June 9th 10 10:33 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017