Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is it correct to use 999 in this case...?
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 22:42:15 GMT, "Jack Taylor"
wrote: I've never understood why we don't have a 'serious but not emergency' number to call in this country, something like 888 would be logical. I believe that that idea has been discussed and may be implemented in the future, although I believe that they are going to use something far less easy to remember, like 112 or something. Ofcom has just consulted on this. See http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/snen/#content. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Is it correct to use 999 in this case...?
Ken wrote:
Ofcom has just consulted on this. See http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/snen/#content. Thanks for that. I knew that they were up to something! I don't agree with them, though, that 101 is an easy number to dial in such circumstances - especially for the visually impaired. It requires finger movement from the top to the bottom of the keypad and back again, giving two likelihoods of a misdial as opposed to one if a single-digit three-digit number is used (if you follow that!). Even for those with good vision it can be difficult to navigate a keypad in poor lighting conditions or without keypad backlighting. I wonder if the RNIB were consulted and their input considered. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Which rate is correct? | London Transport | |||
Are We Too Politically Correct These Days? | London Transport | |||
Travelcard pricing - is this really correct? | London Transport | |||
Not being let off the bus - this cant be correct? | London Transport | |||
Which is correct | London Transport |