Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"What might be sensible would be if preparatory work for the change was
done now - for instance, stringing catenary to Shepherd's Bush, but not wiring it up to the mains." We can but live in hope, Tom! "Because (a) this allows the CTRL phase 2 to be built" Yes, I gather that... "increasing speed" .... by a few minutes.... "and reducing congestion in the south London network" Will removing (is it 2 or 3 per hour) a few Eurostar trains from the South of London will hardly cause such a dramatic change will it? And, as for the vacated terminal at Waterloo (itself built at vast expense and admitted reduction of Waterloo domestic handling capacity), I understand that rather than returning it to railway use, a shopping centre is being mooted! "(b) there are a lot more people north of London than south." Yes, but is that really the reason behind this move to St. Pancras? I thought it had something to do with the political goal of a high-speed link for its own sake rather than there actually being a pressing need for such. That, surely, must be the reason why all of St. Pancras' domestic passengers have been given the two-finger salute as they struggle alonng a dirty, narrow, unsafe and overcrowded passage that was Pancras Road, to a station so badly designed that its escalators actually face the wrong direction to the main traffic flow, and whose departure boards are hidden like State secrets well away from view! "Give up!" Indeed, so appalling do I find the new St. Pancras interchange that I will find ANY alternative changing arrangements when travelling North next time. Surely this travesty of a station should be called Pancras North or similar, and unsuspecting passengers who are so naive to believe they can get from Underground to mainline train in less than 15 minutes should be warned of what they can expect. Marc. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, but is that really the reason behind this move to St. Pancras? I
thought it had something to do with the political goal of a high-speed link for its own sake rather than there actually being a pressing need for such. That, surely, must be the reason why all of St. Pancras' domestic passengers have been given the two-finger salute as they struggle alonng a dirty, narrow, unsafe and overcrowded passage that was Pancras Road, to a station so badly designed that its escalators actually face the wrong direction to the main traffic flow, and whose departure boards are hidden like State secrets well away from view! "Give up!" Indeed, so appalling do I find the new St. Pancras interchange that I will find ANY alternative changing arrangements when travelling North next time. Surely this travesty of a station should be called Pancras North or similar, and unsuspecting passengers who are so naive to believe they can get from Underground to mainline train in less than 15 minutes should be warned of what they can expect. The current arrangement is temporary. When all the work is finished there will be direct indoor access from the new tube station ticket halls to the main line station, but you know this already. How are the departure boards hidden? They are straight in front of you as you walk in the main entrance. And 15 minutes is plenty of time, even with luggage. Seven minutes was my time today. -- Peter |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Goodland,
Actually, I did not know that the present arrangements are temporary - indeed the staff seem not to know that either since, when I asked one of them, he agreed that this was a lamentable change and mentioned nothing about it being temporary either! The departure boards on the platform level is what I was referring to. I did not even see any at the entrance as I came in - I was too busy searching for the escalators! Seven minutes is hardly something to boast about! Why should domestic passengers have to be so inconvenienced (to say nothing of being denied the use of one of London's finest Gothic buildings) at all? Moreover, I'd suggest 7 minutes when going AGAINST the morning commuter flow, as I invariably would be, is rather optimistic! Marc. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
whose departure boards are hidden like State secrets well away from view!
Left in taxis? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Shepherd's Bush WLL again | London Transport | |||
Shepherd's Bush WLL | London Transport | |||
Shepherd's Bush (WLL and CLR) | London Transport | |||
Shepherd's Bush WLL update | London Transport | |||
Shepherd's Bush WLL | London Transport |