![]() |
|
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
Scenario: a friend of mine from Dublin was coming across to do the
London Marathon and asked me what ticket he should get. He was arriving at Heathrow, then had to go across London to Custom House to pick up his marathon stuff. He then had to come back to Leicester Square to meet me for dinner, then we were heading back to New Cross afterwards. All tube or DLR journeys apart from the very last one, which was on National Rail. Mindful of the fact that Oyster prepay doesn't work on NR, I told him to get a one day travelcard for Zones 1-6 at Heathrow. As you can see, I didn't realise that you can't put one day travelcards onto Oyster! Result: my friend's journey goes smoothly until we get to Charing Cross to catch the New Cross train. He's not allowed through the barrier and the guards just keep yelling "Prepay is not valid on National Rail", without explaining the one day travelcard issue (we were protesting that he had a travelcard). I now understand why it didn't work, but have some questions: 1. What was my friend sold at Heathrow when he asked for a Zone 1-6 one day travelcard to be put onto his Oyster card? 2. Would he have been able to buy a paper ticket at Heathrow for the same price, thus being able to use National Rail on a one day travelcard? Patrick |
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
|
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
|
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
MIG wrote: Actually, you must be able to get paper one day travelcards at Heathrow, so he was sold the wrong thing. Presumably there was a £3 deposit on the Oyster or did he already have one for some reason? If he had one already and offered it at the counter, whoever was serving should still have asked how much credit he wanted to put on it, so the situation is difficult to explain. No, he put a £3 deposit down to get the Oyster, as he makes frequent trips to London and thought it'd be worth the investment (how wrong he was!). I'll find out more detail of the actual transaction and let you know what he actually asked for; I'm just assuming it was a Zone 1-6 one day travelcard as that's what I'd told him to ask for. We bit the bullet and just paid the £1.90 from Charing Cross to New Cross rather than trek from Embankment up to Whitechapel and then down to New Cross from there. Don't get me wrong, I'm all in favour of Oyster as a general rule, I think it's a great system. It does seem to be a rather odd decision to not be able to load one day travelcards onto it, though, in addition to having prepay capping. Roll on the day that Ken gets control of NR in London and makes them accept Oyster prepay, is all I can say. Patrick |
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
Bob Wood wrote:
A paper ticket is the only way to get a One-Day TravelCard. Just why is this? The benefits of extensions for unplanned journeys apply just as much to one day travelcards as to longer season tickets so why can't people get the card on Oyster? |
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
|
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
In message , Tim Roll-Pickering
writes Just why is this? The benefits of extensions for unplanned journeys apply just as much to one day travelcards as to longer season tickets so why can't people get the card on Oyster? Because it is not (yet) accepted by National Rail in most of the London area. -- Paul Terry |
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
Paul Terry wrote:
Just why is this? The benefits of extensions for unplanned journeys apply just as much to one day travelcards as to longer season tickets so why can't people get the card on Oyster? Because it is not (yet) accepted by National Rail in most of the London area. But they have no problem accepting my longer season ticket so why not a one day season ticket? |
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
|
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
|
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
In message , Tim Roll-Pickering
writes Paul Terry wrote: Because it is not (yet) accepted by National Rail in most of the London area. But they have no problem accepting my longer season ticket so why not a one day season ticket? I've never seen a good reason why a (pre-purchased) ODTC on Oyster shouldn't be acceptable to the TOCs (pre-pay is a more complicated issue, of course). Still, it *is* going to happen, despite the TOCs dragging their heels at every opportunity. -- Paul Terry |
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
In ,
Martin Underwood typed: Forgive a naive question, You're forgiven. ... but what is the advantage of Oyster over paper tickets - either specific single/return ones or a one-day travelcard? Are Oyster fares cheaper than paper-ticket fares for the same journey (assuming it's not by NR!) Oyster singles are always cheaper than paper singles (there isn't such a thing as return ticket on LT-only journeys). Oyster daily capping will result in a total fare of at least 50p less than the equivalent one-day travelcard (ignoring the fact that you can't use Oyster on most NR trains). Bus journeys are cheaper with Oyster; Oyster capping on bus journeys will result in a total fare of 50p less than a one-day bus pass. ... or is the main advantage the convenience of not having to queue up at a counter or ticket machine before you can travel? Saving money - or saving time - you can decide which is the main advantage for yourself. -- Bob |
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
Paul Terry wrote:
I've never seen a good reason why a (pre-purchased) ODTC on Oyster shouldn't be acceptable to the TOCs (pre-pay is a more complicated issue, of course). AIUI, it seems to be because for some reason you can't load one day travelcards onto Oyster cards, rather than that the TOCs won't accept one day travelcards on Oyster. Patrick |
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
In message , Martin
Underwood writes Forgive a naive question, but what is the advantage of Oyster over paper tickets - either specific single/return ones or a one-day travelcard? Are Oyster fares cheaper than paper-ticket fares for the same journey (assuming it's not by NR!) Yes - considerably cheaper: an off-peak bus journey is 80p with Oyster, £1.50 with a paper ticket; a zone 1 tube single is £1.50 with Oyster or £3 without. Oyster fare-capping means that one day's use should be 50p or so below the equivalent one-day travelcard price - so, a much smaller saving there, and no saving at all if the travel includes a national rail journey since that will normally have to be paid for as an additional item. or is the main advantage the convenience of not having to queue up at a counter or ticket machine before you can travel? That is another advantage. The current non-acceptance by most of National Rail in London for prepay/occasional travel is the biggest disadvantage for many. -- Paul Terry |
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
Bob Wood wrote:
Oyster singles are always cheaper than paper singles (there isn't such a thing as return ticket on LT-only journeys). Except for certain DLR journeys. -- Michael Hoffman |
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
In ,
Martin Underwood typed: Forgive an equally naive supplementary: what is "capping" in this context? Individual fares are deducted from the balance until the daily 'capping' level is reached. After that no more is deducted. To take the simplest example, the off-peak Oyster bus fare is 80p. Make one bus journey and 80p is deducted from your balance. Make another bus journey and another 80p is deducted. Make a third bus journey and another 80p is deducted, making £2.40 for the three journeys. Now comes the clever bit - the daily cap for bus journeys is set at £3 - so, you make a fourth journey and 60p is deducted. Nothing more would be deducted for any further bus journeys on the same day. -- Bob |
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
In ,
Michael Hoffman typed: Bob Wood wrote: Oyster singles are always cheaper than paper singles (there isn't such a thing as return ticket on LT-only journeys). Except for certain DLR journeys. Return tickets for certain DLR journeys? I wasn't aware of this and can't find them in the Fares booklet http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tfl/fares-tick...fares-2006.pdf Please tell me more. -- Bob |
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
Bob Wood wrote in
: In , Martin Underwood typed: Forgive an equally naive supplementary: what is "capping" in this context? Individual fares are deducted from the balance until the daily 'capping' level is reached. After that no more is deducted. To take the simplest example, the off-peak Oyster bus fare is 80p. Make one bus journey and 80p is deducted from your balance. Make another bus journey and another 80p is deducted. Make a third bus journey and another 80p is deducted, making £2.40 for the three journeys. Now comes the clever bit - the daily cap for bus journeys is set at £3 - so, you make a fourth journey and 60p is deducted. Nothing more would be deducted for any further bus journeys on the same day. Hey, that's really impressive. So it works a bit like a one-day travelcard in the sense that you get unlimited travel for a fixed price (£3 for buses) with the additional benefit that if you use it less than this amount on a certain day, you don't even pay the full £3. I can see why they are beneficial to customers, but what's the incentive for the train/bus operators - are the admin costs lower? If/when they ever include NR trains as well as buses and underground, and assuming the same geographical coverage as for the paper one-day travelcard, it might be worth considering. However I bet if you live outside London there won't be a way of buying a paper return ticket to the nearest boundary station and then an "Oyster travelcard" - unless your train happens to stop at that boundary station. |
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
"Bob Wood" wrote in news:zaJ5g.95$2k4.78@newsfe7-
win.ntli.net: In , Martin Underwood typed: Forgive an equally naive supplementary: what is "capping" in this context? Individual fares are deducted from the balance until the daily 'capping' level is reached. After that no more is deducted. To take the simplest example, the off-peak Oyster bus fare is 80p. Make one bus journey and 80p is deducted from your balance. Make another bus journey and another 80p is deducted. Make a third bus journey and another 80p is deducted, making £2.40 for the three journeys. Now comes the clever bit - the daily cap for bus journeys is set at £3 - so, you make a fourth journey and 60p is deducted. Nothing more would be deducted for any further bus journeys on the same day. If you took four bus journeys and then a single zone 3 tube journey, in that order, would you be charged... £3 (cap for bus pass) plus £1 (single Oyster tube journey in zone 3) totallying £4 or £3.20 (cap removed when Oyster realises a tube journey is then taken) plus £1 (single Oyster tube journey in zone 3) ??? If it's the above, then that's cool. If it's the second option, then perhaps it's a good idea to have two PAYG cards - one for buses, and one for tubes when bus caps have been reached! |
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
|
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
"Martin Underwood" typed
Forgive an equally naive supplementary: what is "capping" in this context? Limiting the amount that will be deducted from Oyster PrePay balance for one day's use. If the traveller only uses buses, the amount is 'capped' at £3, the cost of a One Day Bus Pass is normally £3.50. The amount capped is 50p below the equivalent paper ticket. If the traveller uses buses and the Tube, the amount capped is also 50p below the equivalent Travelcard. (eg a Zone 1-4 paper Travelcard is £5.40, but only £4.90 will be deducted from Oyster PrePay balance for all travel within these Zones in a day.) This is fine until the traveller wishes to use National Railways, where Oyster PrePay is usually not accepted, but paper Travelcard are... -- Helen D. Vecht: Edgware. |
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
In . 109.145,
Tristán White typed: If you took four bus journeys and then a single zone 3 tube journey, in that order, would you be charged... £3 (cap for bus pass) plus £1 (single Oyster tube journey in zone 3) totallying £4 or £3.20 (cap removed when Oyster realises a tube journey is then taken) plus £1 (single Oyster tube journey in zone 3) ??? If it's the above, then that's cool. If it's the second option, then perhaps it's a good idea to have two PAYG cards - one for buses, and one for tubes when bus caps have been reached! It would be the first of those two options. The 'bus cap' would remain and a further £1 would be deducted for the Z3 tube journey. But to go on from that point, if you were then to make another Z3 tube journey, the bus cap would be replaced by the Z1-4 off-peak cap at £4.90 (assuming all journeys have been off-peak) - so only 90p would be deducted from the balance. You would then be able to make bus journeys and tube journeys within Z1-3 without further deduction. NB you would still have to Touch In and Touch Out - but nothing more would be deducted. The cap will always be progressed to the appropriate one as further journeys are made. -- Bob |
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
"Tristán White" wrote in message . 109.145... "Bob Wood" wrote in news:zaJ5g.95$2k4.78@newsfe7- win.ntli.net: In , Martin Underwood typed: Forgive an equally naive supplementary: what is "capping" in this context? Individual fares are deducted from the balance until the daily 'capping' level is reached. After that no more is deducted. To take the simplest example, the off-peak Oyster bus fare is 80p. Make one bus journey and 80p is deducted from your balance. Make another bus journey and another 80p is deducted. Make a third bus journey and another 80p is deducted, making £2.40 for the three journeys. Now comes the clever bit - the daily cap for bus journeys is set at £3 - so, you make a fourth journey and 60p is deducted. Nothing more would be deducted for any further bus journeys on the same day. If you took four bus journeys and then a single zone 3 tube journey, in that order, would you be charged... £3 (cap for bus pass) plus £1 (single Oyster tube journey in zone 3) totallying £4 or £3.20 (cap removed when Oyster realises a tube journey is then taken) plus £1 (single Oyster tube journey in zone 3) ??? If it's the above, then that's cool. If it's the second option, then perhaps it's a good idea to have two PAYG cards - one for buses, and one for tubes when bus caps have been reached! None of the above. You would be charged 80p for the tube journey to bring you up to £3.80 (the Zone 2-6 travelcard cap) as this would be the cheapest available ticket covering all of your journeys. You would be disadvantaged if you used more than one card as you describe. |
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
If you took four bus journeys and then a single zone 3 tube journey, in that order, would you be charged... £3 (cap for bus pass) plus £1 (single Oyster tube journey in zone 3) totallying £4 or £3.20 (cap removed when Oyster realises a tube journey is then taken) plus £1 (single Oyster tube journey in zone 3) ??? If it's the above, then that's cool. If it's the second option, then perhaps it's a good idea to have two PAYG cards - one for buses, and one for tubes when bus caps have been reached! It would be the first of those two options. The 'bus cap' would remain and a further £1 would be deducted for the Z3 tube journey. But to go on from that point, if you were then to make another Z3 tube journey, the bus cap would be replaced by the Z1-4 off-peak cap at £4.90 (assuming all journeys have been off-peak) - so only 90p would be deducted from the balance. You would then be able to make bus journeys and tube journeys within Z1-3 without further deduction. NB you would still have to Touch In and Touch Out - but nothing more would be deducted. The cap will always be progressed to the appropriate one as further journeys are made. Why are you getting charged for Zones 1-4 when all you have used is the tube in Zone 3 and the buses? A Zone 2-6 cap of £3.80 will apply in this case. |
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
Bob Wood wrote:
In , Michael Hoffman typed: Bob Wood wrote: Oyster singles are always cheaper than paper singles (there isn't such a thing as return ticket on LT-only journeys). Except for certain DLR journeys. Return tickets for certain DLR journeys? I wasn't aware of this and can't find them in the Fares booklet http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tfl/fares-tick...fares-2006.pdf Sorry, I was unclear. I meant that Oyster singles are no cheaper for DLR journeys in zones 2-3 since there is a reduced price of £1.50 for a paper ticket in this situation, as was discussed here earlier this week. However it appears that the Oyster price would have been £1 so even that is not true. Sorry. -- Michael Hoffman |
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
In ,
Bob Wood typed: In . 109.145, Tristán White typed: If you took four bus journeys and then a single zone 3 tube journey, in that order, would you be charged... £3 (cap for bus pass) plus £1 (single Oyster tube journey in zone 3) totallying £4 or £3.20 (cap removed when Oyster realises a tube journey is then taken) plus £1 (single Oyster tube journey in zone 3) ??? If it's the above, then that's cool. If it's the second option, then perhaps it's a good idea to have two PAYG cards - one for buses, and one for tubes when bus caps have been reached! It would be the first of those two options. The 'bus cap' would remain and a further £1 would be deducted for the Z3 tube journey. Whoooops!!! No, it wouldn't. I forgot about the Z2-6 cap at £3.80. So a further 80p would be deducted for the Z3 tube journey and further journeys could be made without deduction on buses and on tubes in Z2-6. The capping will always move on to the most appropriate level. NB the bus journeys may have been in Z1 but that doesn't matter - a Z2-6 cap (or any cap) covers bus journeys in any and all zones. -- Bob |
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
In ,
TKD typed: Why are you getting charged for Zones 1-4 when all you have used is the tube in Zone 3 and the buses? A Zone 2-6 cap of £3.80 will apply in this case. Indeed. I belatedly realised my error. I tend to forget the Z2-6 cap in exactly the same way as I tend to forget about the existence of a Z2-6 travelcard. -- Bob |
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
Paul Terry wrote:
In message .com, writes Paul Terry wrote: I've never seen a good reason why a (pre-purchased) ODTC on Oyster shouldn't be acceptable to the TOCs (pre-pay is a more complicated issue, of course). AIUI, it seems to be because for some reason you can't load one day travelcards onto Oyster cards, rather than that the TOCs won't accept one day travelcards on Oyster. I think the only reason why you can't load a ODTC onto Oyster is because it would then be expected to work as a ODTC - i.e. be usable on National Rail. I don't think there is any technical reason why it couldn't be done - Ask Oyster implies that it is only a matter of time: "at present only 7 Day and longer period Travelcards are available on Oyster". There is no technical reason why ODTCs couldn't be loaded onto Oysters. However, introducing yet another layer of complication into Oyster might not be a good idea, and it might delay the rollout of PAYG to the TOCs (if there is no urgent perceived need for PAYG on NR). The problem is that ODTC is really a different product to PAYG capping, so if both were possible on Oyster, users would get even more confused than they already are. Until PAYG is rolled out to the TOCs, I really think that the information about Oyster should be improved somehow. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
In message , Dave Arquati
writes There is no technical reason why ODTCs couldn't be loaded onto Oysters. However, introducing yet another layer of complication into Oyster might not be a good idea, How is it more complicated than using a 7-day travelcard on Oyster, which is already possible? and it might delay the rollout of PAYG to the TOCs (if there is no urgent perceived need for PAYG on NR). I think that the dates for implementation of PAYG are now out of the hands of the TOCs - would accepting ODTCs involve anything more than changing information for staff and customers? The problem is that ODTC is really a different product to PAYG capping, so if both were possible on Oyster, users would get even more confused than they already are. I agree with the former, but much of the latter is due to the current situation in which only certain types of travelcard are acceptable on Oyster. Until PAYG is rolled out to the TOCs, I really think that the information about Oyster should be improved somehow. Absolutely :) -- Paul Terry |
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
Paul Terry wrote:
In message , Dave Arquati writes There is no technical reason why ODTCs couldn't be loaded onto Oysters. However, introducing yet another layer of complication into Oyster might not be a good idea, How is it more complicated than using a 7-day travelcard on Oyster, which is already possible? It creates two different (but yet confusingly similar) ways of paying for a single day's travel. and it might delay the rollout of PAYG to the TOCs (if there is no urgent perceived need for PAYG on NR). I think that the dates for implementation of PAYG are now out of the hands of the TOCs - would accepting ODTCs involve anything more than changing information for staff and customers? There's still some dragging of feet, and it's certainly not out of most TOCs' hands. TfL are taking over Silverlink Metro in 2007, and the DfT have mandated Oyster acceptance on SWT in 2009 - but only because they were laying out the groundwork for new bids. Given that three franchises have only just started (Greater Western, Thameslink Great Northern and South Eastern), it could be years before the DfT can mandate Oyster acceptance on those modes. For any TOCs other than SWT or Silverlink Metro, the decision is still in their hands, and probably depends on both TfL converting Oyster to the interoperable standard (ITSO), and on TOCs seeing some advantage in rolling out smartcard operation across their networks. The problem is that ODTC is really a different product to PAYG capping, so if both were possible on Oyster, users would get even more confused than they already are. I agree with the former, but much of the latter is due to the current situation in which only certain types of travelcard are acceptable on Oyster. I think there is a fairly clear delineation in many users' minds between day tickets (singles, ODTCs) and season tickets (weeklies, monthlies, annuals). A day ticket is an occasional and potentially impromptu purchase, whilst a season ticket requires some advance planning to decide whether you need it. I wouldn't consider a one-day travelcard as part of the same "range" as a season ticket when I think about my travel. Until PAYG is rolled out to the TOCs, I really think that the information about Oyster should be improved somehow. Absolutely :) -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
Dave Arquati wrote: For any TOCs other than SWT or Silverlink Metro, the decision is still in their hands, and probably depends on both TfL converting Oyster to the interoperable standard (ITSO), Whilst it's frustrating not to be able to use PAYG on NR, I do have some sympathy with the TOCs regarding the interoperable standard issue. Why on earth did TfL decide to go with a standalone system? I think there is a fairly clear delineation in many users' minds between day tickets (singles, ODTCs) and season tickets (weeklies, monthlies, annuals). A day ticket is an occasional and potentially impromptu purchase, whilst a season ticket requires some advance planning to decide whether you need it. I wouldn't consider a one-day travelcard as part of the same "range" as a season ticket when I think about my travel. I would disagree with this. To me, the delineation is between simple single/return tickets and travelcards (of whatever length), because the latter allow you unlimited journeys within the timeframe, whereas the former don't. Patrick |
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
In message , Dave Arquati
writes For any TOCs other than SWT or Silverlink Metro, the decision is still in their hands, and probably depends on both TfL converting Oyster to the interoperable standard (ITSO), and on TOCs seeing some advantage in rolling out smartcard operation across their networks. I wouldn't be too pessimistic, though. Southern announced last year that they are committed to implementing Oyster prepay (with an initial pilot scheme between Balham and Victoria), zonal fares are set to appear in January (a pre-requisite for prepay), and I gather that Oyster-ITSO compatibility trials are well under way. I guess the other TOCs (and ATOC) remain unenthusiastic, but I noticed that Peter Hendy said that any existing London TOCs who bid for the Silverlink concession will be pressed on their wider plans for Oyster. I still don't really see why the TOCs cannot widen their acceptance of Oyster travelcards to include the one- and three-day types, in advance of prepay - but I don't think it will happen. I wouldn't consider a one-day travelcard as part of the same "range" as a season ticket when I think about my travel. No, but the increasing number of people who work from home and commute to the office on only a couple of days a week (or less) do. It seems odd that such people, who help reduce the amount of peak-time overcrowding on the network, get so little encouragement from the current ticketing arrangements. -- Paul Terry |
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
wrote:
For any TOCs other than SWT or Silverlink Metro, the decision is still in their hands, and probably depends on both TfL converting Oyster to the interoperable standard (ITSO), Whilst it's frustrating not to be able to use PAYG on NR, I do have some sympathy with the TOCs regarding the interoperable standard issue. Why on earth did TfL decide to go with a standalone system? Because they wanted to implement Oyster without waiting 5 years. When Oyster was being planned, ITSO didn't exist - TfL decided to press ahead with its smartcard implementation anyway, rather than spend years waiting for a bunch of committees to come up with something possibly workable. (so why wasn't the ITSO standard based on Oyster, then? for some reason, the phrase "petty bureaucratic infighting" comes to mind) -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
On Wed, 3 May 2006, John B wrote:
wrote: For any TOCs other than SWT or Silverlink Metro, the decision is still in their hands, and probably depends on both TfL converting Oyster to the interoperable standard (ITSO), Whilst it's frustrating not to be able to use PAYG on NR, I do have some sympathy with the TOCs regarding the interoperable standard issue. Why on earth did TfL decide to go with a standalone system? Because they wanted to implement Oyster without waiting 5 years. When Oyster was being planned, ITSO didn't exist - TfL decided to press ahead with its smartcard implementation anyway, rather than spend years waiting for a bunch of committees to come up with something possibly workable. (so why wasn't the ITSO standard based on Oyster, then? for some reason, the phrase "petty bureaucratic infighting" comes to mind) Closely followed by 'intellectual property rights'. It's also possible that ITSO does things that Oyster doesn't (a common property of committee-designed specifications), but i haven't seen a detailed ITSO vs Oyster comparison. tom -- Civis Britannicus sum. |
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
Why on earth did TfL decide to go with a standalone system?
Because they wanted to implement Oyster without waiting 5 years. When Oyster was being planned, ITSO didn't exist - TfL decided to press ahead with its smartcard implementation anyway, rather than spend years waiting for a bunch of committees to come up with something possibly workable. Oh, that makes sense; I had just assumed that ITSO was an already-existing standard. All sympathy for TOCs now vanishes! g Patrick |
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
|
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
|
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
Colin Rosenstiel wrote: In article .com, () wrote: Why on earth did TfL decide to go with a standalone system? Because they wanted to implement Oyster without waiting 5 years. When Oyster was being planned, ITSO didn't exist - TfL decided to press ahead with its smartcard implementation anyway, rather than spend years waiting for a bunch of committees to come up with something possibly workable. Oh, that makes sense; I had just assumed that ITSO was an already-existing standard. All sympathy for TOCs now vanishes! g The TOCs don't have any choice. They have to do what the DfT (and the SRA before it) tell them on this. On the other hand, TfL does have a choice about whether to implement punishment fares for people who don't use Oyster years before Oyster is available to everyone. If you live in one of the many places in London (particularly south) where there are NR stations and local shops can't top up Oyster, you have little choice but to get a paper season ticket. You might have an Oyster which you put prepay on when you get the chance, near work in central London say, but you wouldn't be able to put your travelcard on it on the morning when you needed to renew. But if you need to travel on the Underground one stop beyond the zone of your paper season travelcard, you have three choices. 1) buy a paper extension at a punishment fare of £3 2) use prepay for your whole journey from where you get on near work (despite being covered for most of it by your paper travelcard) 3) get off the train before your stop, go up the escalator, through the barrier with your travelcard, back in the barrier with your Oyster, down the escalator again and wait for another train If you try to use Prepay without doing either 2 or 3, you risk a penalty fare. 3) is what I had to do several times in recent weeks, when I had some appointments one stop beyond my usual zone, and was in a hurry. So why is TfL punishing people for not doing something that they can't do yet? |
One day travelcards and Oyster...again!
Barry Salter wrote: On 5 May 2006 14:52:14 -0700, "MIG" wrote: If you live in one of the many places in London (particularly south) where there are NR stations and local shops can't top up Oyster, you have little choice but to get a paper season ticket. You might have an Oyster which you put prepay on when you get the chance, near work in central London say, but you wouldn't be able to put your travelcard on it on the morning when you needed to renew. Why not? Assuming you live within the Travelcard Area, there's nothing to stop you from getting a Weekly or longer Travelcard on Oyster and renewing it in advance (as your Oyster has three slots for Season Tickets). I live in Edmonton, North London. My nearest Underground stations are Turnpike Lane - Southgate (inclusive) on the Piccadilly Line or Seven Sisters on the Victoria Line. Admittedly, I do have several Oyster "Ticket Stops" nearby, but I opt to renew my Monthly at a convenient Underground Station about a week before it runs out. Problem solved. I was in Twickenham recently, and could not find anywhere that could top up an Oyster. If you work near somewhere like Oxford Circus, you are lucky to get into the station in the evening, let alone get near the ticket counter, if you remember. But if you need to travel on the Underground one stop beyond the zone of your paper season travelcard, you have three choices. 1) buy a paper extension at a punishment fare of £3 2) use prepay for your whole journey from where you get on near work (despite being covered for most of it by your paper travelcard) 3) get off the train before your stop, go up the escalator, through the barrier with your travelcard, back in the barrier with your Oyster, down the escalator again and wait for another train 4) Use your Travelcard+PrePay Oyster, thereby paying the appropriate extension rate. Something I do on a regular basis with no problems whatsoever. But my list was about what you have to do if you've got a paper travelcard, in which case 4) is impossible. If you try to use Prepay without doing either 2 or 3, you risk a penalty fare. 3) is what I had to do several times in recent weeks, when I had some appointments one stop beyond my usual zone, and was in a hurry. So why is TfL punishing people for not doing something that they can't do yet? Presumably because ATOC wouldn't play by TfL's "rules" over the rollout of Oyster as, funnily enough, the TOCs didn't want to be tied to a single supplier when there was a national standard in the offing. That's their problem. Why should their customers be punished by TfL? Are they expecting us to be able to nag our TOCs into submission? I need someone's neck to squeeze at this point. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:46 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk