| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
 |
|
Menu
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
June 6th 06, 02:57 AM
posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
|
|||
|
|||
West London Tram to go ahead
On Mon, 5 Jun 2006 07:43:05 +0100, Clive D. W. Feather wrote:
The area is as people have already said a very busy area which econmically is doing very well. The 207 are jammed full most of the day. Why replace it then? If they are jammed most of the day, then some more busses might be in order. There's a limit to how many buses per hour you can run on a route. The same number of trams per hour carry far more people. What is actually the limiting factor in how many buses you can run on a route? |
|
#2
June 8th 06, 04:30 AM
posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
|
|||
|
|||
|
West London Tram to go ahead
In article , asdf
writes What is actually the limiting factor in how many buses you can run on a route? * How many buses you can spare. * How many drivers you can spare. * How quickly they can follow each other through bottlenecks. -- Clive D.W. Feather | Home: Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work: Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is: |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Watford to St Albans Tram link to 'go ahead' says MP | London Transport | |||
| West London Tram Scheme | London Transport | |||
| West London Tram Proposal | London Transport | |||
| West London Tram consultation | London Transport | |||
Hybrid Mode
